Hi all,
I had presented this draft in IETF 85 and received many comments from Dave
and Lorenzo.
I have tried to resolve the issues and published the revision as
draft-sarikaya-6man-rfc4191bis-00.txt
I would like to present the draft in Vancouver. Let's discuss the draft on
the list.
Please
-Host, one
legitimately wonders whether this is not the same concept.
Given this perspective of industry interest, I wonder the following:
- what particular industry has interest in
the mechanism of draft-sarikaya-6man-rfc4191bis-00.txt?
- where to discuss this is most appropriate: in an IPv6
A new version of I-D, draft-sarikaya-6man-
>
> rfc4191bis-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Behcet Sarikaya and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Filename:draft-sarikaya-6man-rfc4191bis
> Revision:00
> Title: IPv6 RA Options for Ne
