The premises I'm working from are all in here:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hain-templin-ipv6-localcomm-04.txt
If you think there is something false about them, you'll have
to tell us all by way of commenting on the draft.
Thanks - Fred
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Keith Moore wrote:
Fred,
Fred,
you're working from false premises, so your conclusions are invalid.
Keith
Keith,
You are just plain wrong; read the Mirriam-Webster definitions
for terms like "organization", "enterprise", etc. then read:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hain-templin-ipv6-
localcomm-04.txt
Keith,
You are just plain wrong; read the Mirriam-Webster definitions
for terms like "organization", "enterprise", etc. then read:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hain-templin-ipv6-localcomm-04.txt
and you will see that "organizational scope" is the logical choice.
Fred
[EMAIL P
Hi,
my proposal: Range Restricted Addresses RRAs.
Thomas
Am Samstag, 6. Dezember 2003 19:21 schrieb George Gross:
> Hi,
> how about "private scope addresses"? or when all else fails, draw
> the name out of a hat one word at a time ;o)
>
> br,
> George
>
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Brian
Hi,
how about "private scope addresses"? or when all else fails, draw
the name out of a hat one word at a time ;o)
br,
George
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Keith Moore wrote:
> >
> > > I've chewed on this for quite a while, and I think some derivative
> > > of "p
> I don't think they're inherently specific to anything. They're simply
> addresses that cannot be routed globally.
Then lets just call them NGRA - Not Globally Routed Addresses.
John
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EM
I've chewed on this for quite a while, and I think some derivative
of "private" would be good but a suggestion we heard earlier is
even better. I recall seeing some time back the suggestion of
"Organizational Addresses", and I think this fits best of all.
that's completely ridiculous. these addres
Keith Moore wrote:
>
> > I've chewed on this for quite a while, and I think some derivative
> > of "private" would be good but a suggestion we heard earlier is
> > even better. I recall seeing some time back the suggestion of
> > "Organizational Addresses", and I think this fits best of all.
>
>
> I've chewed on this for quite a while, and I think some derivative
> of "private" would be good but a suggestion we heard earlier is
> even better. I recall seeing some time back the suggestion of
> "Organizational Addresses", and I think this fits best of all.
that's completely ridiculous. the
Bob/Brian,
I've chewed on this for quite a while, and I think some derivative
of "private" would be good but a suggestion we heard earlier is
even better. I recall seeing some time back the suggestion of
"Organizational Addresses", and I think this fits best of all.
An "organization" could be t
Fred Templin wrote:
I'll take mnemonic power, but could do without the cuteness. How
about:
IDEA - Independently-Delegated Endpoint Address
IDEA is the name of a block cypher too, 128bit keylength, so don't
talk to CGA people about IDEA addresses because there might be
confusions :-)
Alex
--
Well, maybe I wasn't paying much attention when that particular rathole
was being discussed, so I don't realize how painful it was.
Anyway, I've put in well more than my two cents' worth on this topic.
Keith
> Hmm - so it seems that you *are* willing to go full circle
> and spin in the ratho
At 12:58 AM 11/24/2003, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Politically, calling them private addresses will work best, even
if it offends end-to-end purists such as myself.
I don't think cute geek acronyms work for this. We're looking for
a suitable chapter heading for a dummies' guide book.
"Configuring p
Hmm - so it seems that you *are* willing to go full circle
and spin in the rathole? Have fun, but please don't try to
take the wg with you; we have already spent way too
much time there.
Fred
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Keith Moore wrote:
You are coming dangerously close to completing the full-circle and
> You are coming dangerously close to completing the full-circle and
> bringing us back to the term "limited range" which was en vogue for
> some time.
well, to me "limited range" seems less dangerous than "private addresses",
but others might disagree.
Keith,
Keith Moore wrote:
More on this point - I have two specific concerns about the use of
"private addresses"
1. potential confusion with RFC 1918 addresses, including the
association of RFC 1918 addresses with "non-routable outside of the
local network" and "used with NATs".
2. potential
Keith Moore wrote:
>mumble. is there a way to call them something that sounds politically
>correct without giving the impression that these addresses only work on
>the local network?
"Private" doesn't give me that impression. "Private" suggests to me
that they work within a region determined b
More on this point - I have two specific concerns about the use of
"private addresses"
1. potential confusion with RFC 1918 addresses, including the
association of RFC 1918 addresses with "non-routable outside of the
local network" and "used with NATs".
2. potential confusion with RFC 3041 "pri
Politically, calling them private addresses will work best, even
if it offends end-to-end purists such as myself.
mumble. is there a way to call them something that sounds politically
correct without giving the impression that these addresses only work on
the local network?
Politically, calling them private addresses will work best, even
if it offends end-to-end purists such as myself.
I don't think cute geek acronyms work for this. We're looking for
a suitable chapter heading for a dummies' guide book.
"Configuring private addresses for your network."
- Brian
GUPIs ("guppies") and PUPIs ("puppies") are things that little
children like to bring home from their local pet store.
and therefore when network experts uses those terms it will nearly
always be clear from context whether they mean pets or addresses -
unlike ideas, which some people actually do
Keith,
GUPIs ("guppies") and PUPIs ("puppies") are things that little
children like to bring home from their local pet store.
IDEAs are things that all Internet users from the most seasoned
professional to the rankest novice immediately associate with
the pure essence of technology. The unspoke
I'll take mnemonic power, but could do without the cuteness.
IMO, some amount of cuteness is actually useful - it encourages people
to use them.
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: htt
I'll take mnemonic power, but could do without the cuteness.
How about:
IDEA - Independently-Delegated Endpoint Address
Fred
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Keith Moore wrote:
I still prefer
GUPI (pronounced "guppy" like the fish) - globally unique
provider-independent
PUPI (pronounced "puppy" like a young
I still prefer
GUPI (pronounced "guppy" like the fish) - globally unique
provider-independent
PUPI (pronounced "puppy" like a young dog) - probably unique
provider-independent
as having about the right ratio of cuteness to mnemonic power.
---
25 matches
Mail list logo
