--- On Thu, 5/27/10, Brian Zill wrote:
> From: Brian Zill
> Subject: RE: which interface to choose to send to destination link-local
> address - any RFC?
> To: "Parav Pandit"
> Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org"
> Date: Thursday, May 27, 2010, 10:24 PM
> Hi Para
On May 27, 2010, at 09:54, Brian Zill wrote:
>
> [...]
> Typically, any reasonable protocol that uses link-local addresses will learn
> any peer's addresses by receiving packets from that peer on that particular
> link. The protocol will then keep both the link-local address *and* the
> scope-
Original Message-
> From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Parav
> Pandit
> Sent: Thursday, 27 May, 2010 08:25
> To: Suresh Krishnan
> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: which interface to choose to send to destination link-local
> address - any
Parav
--- On Thu, 5/27/10, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
> From: Suresh Krishnan
> Subject: Re: which interface to choose to send to destination link-local
> address - any RFC?
> To: "Parav Pandit"
> Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org"
> Date: Thursday, May 27, 2010, 8:04 P
esh Krishnan
> Subject: Re: which interface to choose to send to destination link-local
> address - any RFC?
> To: "Parav Pandit"
> Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org"
> Date: Thursday, May 27, 2010, 8:04 PM
> On 10-05-27 09:28 AM, Brian Haberman
> wrote:
> > You will ne
On 10-05-27 09:28 AM, Brian Haberman wrote:
You will need the scope_id in order to use ping6. In order to send any
packet to a link-local address, you will need the scope_id first.
+1. So my question to you is, how did you get the LL address in the
first place? That should give you clues as t
to rely on ping6
> to get the right interface_id.
See above.
Regards,
Brian
>
> Regards, Parav Pandit
>
>
> --- On Thu, 5/27/10, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
>> From: Mikael Abrahamsson Subject: Re: which
>> interface to choose to send to destination link-local ad
response processing.
so I believe it should be o.k to rely on ping6 to get the right interface_id.
Regards,
Parav Pandit
--- On Thu, 5/27/10, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> From: Mikael Abrahamsson
> Subject: Re: which interface to choose to send to destination link-local
> address - any
On Thu, 27 May 2010, Parav Pandit wrote:
I don't know on which vlan the destination link-local address is.
Well, you pretty much know that to send packets to it. A link-local
address is not just an address, you need to provide what interface you're
referring to. It's of local signifance only
to send to destination link-local
> address - any RFC?
> To: "Parav Pandit"
> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
> Date: Wednesday, April 14, 2010, 3:01 PM
>
>
>
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Parav Pandit wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > In IPv6 stack implementation,
> &
At Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:58:05 -0400,
Simon Perreault wrote:
> > So in case of TCP, client which tries to connect to the server, should
> > provide its link-local source address during socket(), bind() calls.
>
> No. On the client side there should be no bind() call, and the socket()
> call is un
I think this topic belongs to the MIF WG. Maybe they have
already discussed it. If not, they probably should.
http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/mif/charter/
Brian
On 2010-04-14 21:00, Parav Pandit wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In IPv6 stack implementation,
>
> How IPv6 stack should select the outgoing inte
On 2010-04-14 06:56, Parav Pandit wrote:
So in case of TCP, client which tries to connect to the server, should
provide its link-local source address during socket(), bind() calls.
No. On the client side there should be no bind() call, and the socket()
call is unaffected since it doesn't take
,
Parav Pandit
--- On Wed, 4/14/10, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
From: Mohacsi Janos
Subject: Re: which interface to choose to send to destination link-local
address - any RFC?
To: "Parav Pandit"
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Date: Wednesday, April 14, 2010, 3:01 PM
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Parav Pa
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Parav Pandit wrote:
Hi,
In IPv6 stack implementation,
How IPv6 stack should select the outgoing interface to choose (when multiple
interfaces) are available?
Typically when the destination is the link-local address which may be on-link
on both the interfaces (before
t
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 02:00:36 -0700 (PDT), Parav Pandit
wrote:
> How IPv6 stack should select the outgoing interface to choose (when
> multiple interfaces) are available? Typically when the destination is the
> link-local address which may be on-link on both the interfaces (before
the
> neighbor d
Hi,
In IPv6 stack implementation,
How IPv6 stack should select the outgoing interface to choose (when multiple
interfaces) are available? Typically when the destination is the link-local
address which may be on-link on both the interfaces (before the neighbor
discovery) is done?
Should IPv6 s
17 matches
Mail list logo
