[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17545203#comment-17545203
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-16223:
Commit e
epugh merged PR #885:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/885
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
F
epugh opened a new pull request, #889:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/889
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16228
# Description
Our docs reflect years of evolution of how we add things to solr, and don't
put Solr Modules front and center.
# Solution
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17545200#comment-17545200
]
Eric Pugh commented on SOLR-16226:
--
Here is a summary of all the changes I made to each
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl resolved SOLR-16228.
Resolution: Invalid
It is not possible to do query benchmarks with a single query, let alone on a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean W updated SOLR-16228:
--
Description:
Hi Everyone,
I just found that Solr 9 searches are 400%+ slower than Solr 8 when using
Docker c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean W updated SOLR-16228:
--
Description:
Hi Everyone,
I just found that Solr 9 searches are 400%+ slower than Solr 8 when using
Docker c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean W updated SOLR-16228:
--
Description:
Hi Everyone,
I just found that Solr 9 searches are 400%+ slower than Solr 8 when using
Docker c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean W updated SOLR-16228:
--
Description:
Hi Everyone,
I just found that Solr 8 searches are 400%+ faster than Solr 9.
In case it helps,
Sean W created SOLR-16228:
-
Summary: solr 9 docker container searches 400%+ slower than solr 8
docker container
Key: SOLR-16228
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16228
Project: Solr
Is
HoustonPutman commented on code in PR #857:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/857#discussion_r887204381
##
solr/bin/solr.in.cmd:
##
@@ -224,4 +236,5 @@ REM then enable the following setting to address
CVE-2021-44228
REM set SOLR_OPTS=%SOLR_OPTS% -Dlog4j2.formatMsgNoLook
anshumg merged PR #19:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-sandbox/pull/19
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apach
epugh commented on code in PR #888:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/888#discussion_r887186675
##
solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/handler/admin/V2CollectionsAPIMappingTest.java:
##
@@ -17,42 +17,18 @@
package org.apache.solr.handler.admin;
import static org.apache
epugh commented on code in PR #888:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/888#discussion_r887184488
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/SolrConfigHandler.java:
##
@@ -83,6 +84,7 @@
import org.apache.solr.core.SolrConfig;
import org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore;
impo
gerlowskija opened a new pull request, #888:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/888
# Description
Solr's been in the slow process of moving its v2 APIs away from the
existing apispec/mapping framework towards one that relies on more
explicit annotations to specify API prope
janhoy commented on code in PR #887:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/887#discussion_r887170885
##
solr/modules/sql/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/sql/SolrFilter.java:
##
@@ -362,8 +362,9 @@ protected String translateLike(RexNode like) {
// but that expects th
janhoy commented on PR #887:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/887#issuecomment-1143979653
Thanks! Even a test case; beautiful!
Can you also add a CHANGES.txt line? For now you can add it for the 9.1
section.
Likely this will not make it to 8.11.2 in time, but you can as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17545074#comment-17545074
]
Jan Høydahl edited comment on SOLR-16227 at 6/1/22 6:08 PM:
T
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17545074#comment-17545074
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-16227:
Thanks for the report. Are you skilled in Java a
kiranchitturi opened a new pull request, #887:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/887
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16227
# Description
Please provide a short description of the changes you're making with this
pull request.
# Solution
Please pr
cpoerschke commented on PR #886:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/886#issuecomment-1143908205
> okay, digging in some more
so amending the `purgeParams` calls works I think, making the `spatial`
checkbox similar to the `dismax` and `edismax` dropdown options. WDYT?
--
This
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17545036#comment-17545036
]
Houston Putman commented on SOLR-16226:
---
I kind of think of it in Upper Case, becau
cpoerschke commented on PR #886:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/886#issuecomment-1143876246
> ... getDependentFields("spatial")` logic which might break if the
`spatial.` prefix is simply dropped? ...
okay, so experimentally, when the `spatial` checkbox is unchecked then it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kiran updated SOLR-16227:
-
Fix Version/s: 8.11.2
9.1
> Solr SQL query parsing fails on multiple LIKE clauses and multiple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kiran updated SOLR-16227:
-
Description:
{code:java}
select count(*) as QUERY_COUNT from test_index WHERE (name LIKE 'Sample Temp*')
AND (
Kiran created SOLR-16227:
Summary: Solr SQL query parsing fails on multiple LIKE clauses and
multiple terms
Key: SOLR-16227
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16227
Project: Solr
Issue
epugh commented on PR #886:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/886#issuecomment-1143868787
okay, digging in some more
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
cpoerschke commented on PR #886:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/886#issuecomment-1143867832
Hmm, I'm not very familiar with this code but from trying to learn via the
#122 diff there is I see at
https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/releases/solr/9.0.0/solr/webapp/web/js/angular/con
cpoerschke commented on PR #886:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/886#issuecomment-1143855301
Perhaps last minute candidate for 8.11.2 if this fix is accurate? cc/fyi
@madrob
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christine Poerschke updated SOLR-16142:
---
Affects Version/s: 8.9
9.0
> Spatial search in Query UI genera
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17545012#comment-17545012
]
Christine Poerschke commented on SOLR-16142:
Thanks [~arsaljalib] for reporti
cpoerschke opened a new pull request, #886:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/886
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16142
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the speci
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17544949#comment-17544949
]
Eric Pugh commented on SOLR-16226:
--
So, is a solr module a "Solr Module"? For the sent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17544927#comment-17544927
]
Sebastian commented on SOLR-16152:
--
Thank you for the attention.
A helpful error message
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17544880#comment-17544880
]
Eric Pugh commented on SOLR-16226:
--
These are all the pages that appear to refer to modu
Eric Pugh created SOLR-16226:
Summary: Sync up docs on Module's to reflect how to enable them.
Key: SOLR-16226
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16226
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Impr
epugh commented on PR #885:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/885#issuecomment-1143524197
Thanks for the reviewI have a dream that maybe the ECJ checks could
apply to src/test and fail precommit...I looked at what @ErickErickson did
back in https://issues.apache.org/jira/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17544862#comment-17544862
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-16152:
That command should ideally print a helpful erro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17544857#comment-17544857
]
Jason Gerlowski commented on SOLR-16152:
Hi [~SebasX], thanks for pointing this o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Gerlowski resolved SOLR-16151.
Resolution: Invalid
> Async exception during distributed update: Bad Request
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17544848#comment-17544848
]
Jason Gerlowski commented on SOLR-16151:
Hi Guarav,
1. We try not to use JIRA as
markrmiller merged PR #18:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-sandbox/pull/18
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.a
markrmiller merged PR #17:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-sandbox/pull/17
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.a
43 matches
Mail list logo
