[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17778498#comment-17778498
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-17048:
Commit 0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17778496#comment-17778496
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-17048:
Commit 1
gerlowskija merged PR #2029:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2029
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apach
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Gerlowski resolved SOLR-17042.
Fix Version/s: main (10.0)
9.5
Assignee: Jason Gerlowski
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17778494#comment-17778494
]
Jason Gerlowski commented on SOLR-17042:
I've deprecated the interface and method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17778493#comment-17778493
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-17042:
Commit 4
gerlowskija merged PR #2028:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2028
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apach
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17778490#comment-17778490
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-17042:
Commit b
dsmiley commented on PR #2021:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2021#issuecomment-1774196842
Hey way to go Bruno! Thus essentially all we need is a lock per ID (not
even necessarily "bucket"-ed); the version was an optimization and doesn't seem
to be worth its complexity? @markrmil
