computate opened a new pull request, #706:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/pull/706
Adding an `openshift: true` boolean field to the operator to remove the
default Solr `fsGroup: 8983` securityContext used in Kubernetes.
I have successfully tested these changes in OpenShi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chatree Srichart updated SOLR-17311:
Description:
Why the SortSpectParsing add null field even the sort direction is found.
Whe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17849415#comment-17849415
]
Chatree Srichart commented on SOLR-17311:
-
Should it add a field like this?
!add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chatree Srichart updated SOLR-17311:
Attachment: add_field.png
> SortSpectParsing add null field even the sort direction is foun
epugh commented on PR #2470:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2470#issuecomment-2130110164
Reading back some comments, `ClusterFileStore` is the entry point that
implements `ClusterFileStoreAPI`, is there an argument that `ClusterFileStore`
should do everything `DistribFileStore` do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17849358#comment-17849358
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-13681:
-
I noticed this ticket is "minor" priority but
dsmiley commented on code in PR #2477:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2477#discussion_r1613839800
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/update/SolrIndexConfig.java:
##
@@ -285,6 +294,21 @@ public IndexWriterConfig toIndexWriterConfig(SolrCore
core) throws IOException
epugh commented on PR #2470:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2470#issuecomment-2130102058
> > If DistribFileStore is the lone implementation of FileStore, then do we
need FileStore?
>
> I suspect the intention was that having an interface leaves the door open
to adding a Sol
markrmiller commented on code in PR #2461:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2461#discussion_r1613822238
##
solr/solrj/src/java/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/impl/ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient.java:
##
@@ -566,24 +576,28 @@ public NamedList request(final SolrRequest
request,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chatree Srichart updated SOLR-17311:
Summary: SortSpectParsing add null field even the sort direction is found
(was: SortSpectP
Chatree Srichart created SOLR-17311:
---
Summary: SortSpectParsing add null field even the sort direction
if found
Key: SOLR-17311
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17311
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17849325#comment-17849325
]
Christine Poerschke commented on SOLR-17310:
cross-referencing w.r.t. (perhap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17849324#comment-17849324
]
Christine Poerschke commented on SOLR-13681:
cross-referencing w.r.t. (perhap
cpoerschke opened a new pull request, #2478:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2478
Okay, I could have just pushed this typo fix directly but wanted to take
opportunity to briefly wonder about the (lack of a?) connection between the
Lucene `Codec` returned here and the `luceneMatchVe
gerlowskija commented on code in PR #2461:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2461#discussion_r1613504683
##
solr/solrj/src/java/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/impl/ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient.java:
##
@@ -566,24 +576,28 @@ public NamedList request(final SolrRequest
request,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sanjay Dutt resolved SOLR-17290.
Fix Version/s: 9.7
Resolution: Fixed
> Update SyncStrategy and PeerSyncWithLeader to use the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17849289#comment-17849289
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-17303:
-
The chain that you looks wrong – snappy-java o
dsmiley commented on code in PR #2351:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2351#discussion_r1613436293
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/update/UpdateShardHandler.java:
##
@@ -236,11 +246,17 @@ public SolrMetricsContext getSolrMetricsContext() {
return solrMetricsC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17849260#comment-17849260
]
Sanjay Dutt edited comment on SOLR-16503 at 5/24/24 11:00 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17849260#comment-17849260
]
Sanjay Dutt commented on SOLR-16503:
First look tells me that SolrClientCache is unne
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17849253#comment-17849253
]
Peter Kroiss commented on SOLR-17306:
-
If written a JUnit Test. Exactly 2 methods for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Kroiss updated SOLR-17306:
Attachment: solr-replication-test.txt
> Solr Repeater or Slave loses data after restart when replic
iamsanjay commented on code in PR #2351:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2351#discussion_r1613262239
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/update/UpdateShardHandler.java:
##
@@ -236,11 +246,17 @@ public SolrMetricsContext getSolrMetricsContext() {
return solrMetric
23 matches
Mail list logo
