dsmiley commented on PR #2621:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2621#issuecomment-2292801661
I see less than 2 days: August 6th 3:52pm -> 8th 8:32am. That's too short.
Also we generally give advanced merge notice if there was no feedback
whatsoever.
--
This is an automated mess
Gus Heck created SOLR-17411:
---
Summary: Add randomized testing to apply multithreaded search
Key: SOLR-17411
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17411
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improveme
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gus Heck resolved SOLR-17298.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Multithreaded search breaks limits, and possibly other things
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17874093#comment-17874093
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-17298:
Commit e
anshumg merged PR #2649:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2649
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.or
gerlowskija commented on PR #2621:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2621#issuecomment-2292530594
> This was merged so fast that it got not review; I wanted to review it
I thought 3 days was a reasonable length of time to wait on a pretty clear
and minor bugfix; I hope i'm not
gerlowskija commented on code in PR #2621:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2621#discussion_r1719161093
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/IndexFetcher.java:
##
@@ -1988,16 +1989,38 @@ private FastInputStream getStream() throws IOException {
req.setBa
gerlowskija commented on code in PR #2621:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2621#discussion_r1719161279
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/IndexFetcher.java:
##
@@ -1988,16 +1989,38 @@ private FastInputStream getStream() throws IOException {
req.setBa
dsmiley commented on PR #2615:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2615#issuecomment-2292039368
I'll merge this in a couple days.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
jstaf opened a new issue, #718:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/718
The solr-operator helm chart is missing the ability to specify a custom
imagePullSecret to pull images from self-hosted container repos (that require
authentication).
--
This is an automated message f
solrbot opened a new pull request, #2650:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2650
This PR contains the following updates:
| Package | Type | Update | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| [commons-cli:commons-cli](https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-cli/)
([source](https://gi
dsmiley commented on PR #2612:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2612#issuecomment-2291627819
`crave run -- ./jmh.sh CloudIndexing -jvmArgsAppend
-Dsolr.bench.seed=823716671780822 -p useSmallDocs=true -p nodeCount=1 -p
numShards=1 -p numReplicas=1 -I 8`
The benchmark module u
dsmiley commented on PR #2643:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2643#issuecomment-2291555072
@risdenk I know you introduced this plugin but IMO it's more annoying &
burdensome than helpful. Maybe we should back out this plugin? I was somewhat
appreciative of the Maven equivalent,
jstaf commented on issue #717:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/717#issuecomment-2291521058
I got this to work with a custom solr image with a custom version of
`solr.in.sh` and `zkcli.sh`. Still needs to be fixed in solr-operator though.
solr.in.sh (this change has
iamsanjay commented on PR #2634:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2634#issuecomment-2291509006
We’ll drop this one for now and revisit it when we're about to upgrade.
Thanks for your help @uschindler, and also for clearing up the confusion about
the `DocumentObjectBinder`. Appreciat
uschindler commented on PR #2634:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2634#issuecomment-2291460770
> I'll share my thought process on how I used forbidden APIs. Initially, I
added entries to the config files while we were still using Java 11. Once we
move to Java 21, there will be no n
uschindler commented on PR #2634:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2634#issuecomment-2291438971
Hi,
in my opinion the whole thing is not needed at all. On the day when you
switch to Java 17 or 21 as minimum version you get the forbiddenwarnings
automatically (by both forbiddenapi
iamsanjay commented on PR #2612:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2612#issuecomment-2291372990
Could you please walk me through the process of running this specific
benchmark which is giving the error, such as a command, or anything which helps
me re-produce it on my system.
--
iamsanjay commented on PR #2643:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2643#issuecomment-2291201634
@dsmiley Should I create JIRA for this one?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
iamsanjay commented on PR #2634:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2634#issuecomment-2291197986
I'll share my thought process on how I used forbidden APIs. Initially, I
added entries to the config files while we were still using Java 11. Once we
move to Java 21, there will be no need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17873901#comment-17873901
]
Jason Gerlowski commented on SOLR-17410:
It looks like Houston identified an open
21 matches
Mail list logo
