[GitHub] [solr] andywebb1975 commented on pull request #1324: SOLR-16643: Add multiplying boost option to rerank query parser

2023-03-07 Thread via GitHub
andywebb1975 commented on PR #1324: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1324#issuecomment-1458609616 superseded by https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1431 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL a

[GitHub] [solr] andywebb1975 commented on pull request #1324: SOLR-16643: Add multiplying boost option to rerank query parser

2023-03-04 Thread via GitHub
andywebb1975 commented on PR #1324: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1324#issuecomment-1454711385 I've made a new PR introducing both options: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1431 - could you give that a review please? (It felt cleaner to raise a new PR, though now I'm not

[GitHub] [solr] andywebb1975 commented on pull request #1324: SOLR-16643: Add multiplying boost option to rerank query parser

2023-03-04 Thread via GitHub
andywebb1975 commented on PR #1324: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1324#issuecomment-1454682268 I have committer rights now - a massive thank you if you were involved in arranging this! I'm wondering whether to merge this as-is, or supersede it with a version including a `r

[GitHub] [solr] andywebb1975 commented on pull request #1324: SOLR-16643: Add multiplying boost option to rerank query parser

2023-02-17 Thread via GitHub
andywebb1975 commented on PR #1324: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1324#issuecomment-1435271833 > ok. @andywebb1975 I noticed your contributor label! Can you squash-merge it on your own? Sure, have just squashed it. I'm just a contributor - don't have committer rights, if t

[GitHub] [solr] andywebb1975 commented on pull request #1324: SOLR-16643: Add multiplying boost option to rerank query parser

2023-02-17 Thread via GitHub
andywebb1975 commented on PR #1324: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1324#issuecomment-1435108644 > Oh.. somehow, I stepped in CHANGES. Colleagues, would you mind approve or point on some stuff to improve? Is there anything I can do to help here? The update looks fine to me.

[GitHub] [solr] andywebb1975 commented on pull request #1324: SOLR-16643: Add multiplying boost option to rerank query parser

2023-02-16 Thread via GitHub
andywebb1975 commented on PR #1324: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1324#issuecomment-1433376588 > Hi, @andywebb1975 . I pushed commit replacing switch to closure in doc scoring loop. Please have a look. WDYT? Thanks @mkhludnev - yes, that does look cleaner! -- This is an

[GitHub] [solr] andywebb1975 commented on pull request #1324: SOLR-16643: Add multiplying boost option to rerank query parser

2023-02-06 Thread via GitHub
andywebb1975 commented on PR #1324: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1324#issuecomment-1419588565 I've updated this to use an `enum` following one of the examples above - how does it look now? (I've seen `gradlew check` work locally but Crave.io seems to be having issues :-(