dsmiley commented on PR #2498:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2498#issuecomment-2289360382
@uvatbc thanks for offering to help further (edit our build) if you wish but
I wouldn't want any feedback on these PRs to be implied that it is for you to
update our build. You give us Crav
uvatbc commented on PR #2498:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2498#issuecomment-2278924832
> If crave.yml change the Java version to 21, `gradlew check` should fail,
more specifically the `ecj-lint` version that we are currently using make sure
the Java version should be less than
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #2498:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2498#issuecomment-2278892872
This PR has had no activity for 60 days and is now labeled as stale. Any
new activity or converting it to draft will remove the stale label. To attract
more reviewers, please t
iamsanjay commented on PR #2498:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2498#issuecomment-2157150820
If crave.yml change the Java version to 21, `gradlew check` should fail,
more specifically the `ecj-lint` version that we are currently using make sure
the Java version should be less than
dsmiley commented on PR #2498:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2498#issuecomment-2153002420
Before this change here, isn't there some existing build image for Solr you
@uvatbc worked on ?
@iamsanjay assuming the build starts running on JDK 21 (wherever -- CI /
Crave / dev ma
iamsanjay commented on PR #2498:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2498#issuecomment-2151167656
I tried running this for #2497
(https://foss.crave.io/app/#/build/info/109489?team=5)
> BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 7m 25s
> 141 actionable tasks: 114 executed, 27 up-to-date
I won
uvatbc opened a new pull request, #2498:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2498
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-X
# Description
The Solr project is considering the usage of JDK 21 at some point.
We need to control which JDK is used in Crav
