Re: DbDirectory with Berkeley DB Java Edition

2005-12-14 Thread Andi Vajda
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, jian chen wrote: Hi, I am pretty pessimistic about any DB directory implementation for Lucene. The nature of the Lucene index files does not really fit well into a relational database. Therefore, performance wise, the DB implementations would suffer a lot. Basically, I wou

Re: DbDirectory with Berkeley DB Java Edition

2005-12-14 Thread jian chen
Hi, I am pretty pessimistic about any DB directory implementation for Lucene. The nature of the Lucene index files does not really fit well into a relational database. Therefore, performance wise, the DB implementations would suffer a lot. Basically, I would discourage anyone on the DB implementat

Re: Disabling Lucene's Bugzilla

2005-12-14 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Dec 14, 2005, at 12:28 PM, karl wettin wrote: 14 dec 2005 kl. 15.09 skrev Erik Hatcher: Infrastructure, We have long since migrated to JIRA as our issue tracker. Could we get our Bugzilla disabled so no new issues or comments are added? do you mean disable or remove? i find old bugre

Re: Disabling Lucene's Bugzilla

2005-12-14 Thread Erik Hatcher
Sander, Thanks for that information. Since no new issues can be created, we'll just monitor any comments ourselves and ask that folks use JIRA instead. Erik On Dec 14, 2005, at 12:44 PM, Sander Temme wrote: On Dec 14, 2005, at 6:09 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote: Infrastructure, We

Re: Disabling Lucene's Bugzilla

2005-12-14 Thread Sander Temme
On Dec 14, 2005, at 6:09 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote: Infrastructure, We have long since migrated to JIRA as our issue tracker. Could we get our Bugzilla disabled so no new issues or comments are added? Lucene in Bugzilla is already closed for bug entry. I realize that people can still edit

Re: Directory Implementation: Java Content Repository

2005-12-14 Thread Nicolas Belisle
Hi Erik, Since Java Content Repository uses java.io.InputStream, I extended RAMInputStream to achieve random reads from the java.io.InputStream. (Have a better idea ?) However RAMInputStream and its constructor parameter (RAMFile) are package private. Should I ? : - 1. Put all my thing in

Re: Disabling Lucene's Bugzilla

2005-12-14 Thread karl wettin
14 dec 2005 kl. 15.09 skrev Erik Hatcher: Infrastructure, We have long since migrated to JIRA as our issue tracker. Could we get our Bugzilla disabled so no new issues or comments are added? do you mean disable or remove? i find old bugreports to be a good source of information. has all d

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-362) [PATCH] Extension to binary Fields that allows fixed byte buffer

2005-12-14 Thread Chuck Williams (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-362?page=all ] Chuck Williams updated LUCENE-362: -- Attachment: FixedBufferBinaryFields.patch (Thanks Eric for correcting my mistaken posting to the old issue tracking system) Better late than never I hope.

DbDirectory with Berkeley DB Java Edition

2005-12-14 Thread Steeley Andrew
Hello all, I know this question has been asked before, but I have not found a definitive answer. Has anyone implemented a version of Andi Vajda's DbDirectory that works with the Berkeley DB Java Edition? I am aware of Oscar Picasso's postings on this list on the topic, but haven't been able

Disabling Lucene's Bugzilla

2005-12-14 Thread Erik Hatcher
Infrastructure, We have long since migrated to JIRA as our issue tracker. Could we get our Bugzilla disabled so no new issues or comments are added? Thanks, Erik Begin forwarded message: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: December 14, 2005 1:00:26 AM EST To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34066] - [PATCH] Extension to binary Fields that allows fixed byte buffer

2005-12-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu