[jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-4) Index Optimization

2006-04-20 Thread eyal post (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-4?page=comments#action_12375496 ] eyal post commented on LUCENENET-4: --- Jira (The issue tracker) is not the place to ask questions about Lucene. Please use the mailing lists for that: http://mail-archives.a

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-04-20 Thread Karl Wettin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12375453 ] Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550: Due to read and write locks, this is how one must use the extention: InstanciatedIndex ii = new InstanciatedIndex(); IndexWriter iw =

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-04-20 Thread Karl Wettin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=all ] Karl Wettin updated LUCENE-550: --- Attachment: class_diagram.png Class diagram over InstanciatedIndex > InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index >

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-04-20 Thread Karl Wettin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=all ] Karl Wettin updated LUCENE-550: --- Attachment: src.tar.gz The whole Lucene core branch. I think I've messed something up, queries with Directory-implementations are much slower than normal. :-)

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-04-20 Thread Karl Wettin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12375394 ] Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550: > > You might notice that norms are float[] and not byte[]. That is me who > > refactored it to see if it would do > > any good. Bit s

Crash tolerance in Lucene

2006-04-20 Thread Nadav Har'El
Hi, For a certain application, I want Lucene to be tolerant to computer crashes. This means that if the indexing process gets killed, the index should never become corrupt, unusable, or loose large chunks of the indexed files. I am fine with losing a few documents, such as documents that were ind

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2006-04-20 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12375373 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-550: - Thanks Karl, it's interesting stuff... > You might notice that norms are float[] and not byte[]. That is me who > refactored it to

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-551) Make Lucene - Java 1.9.1 Available in Maven2 repository in iBibilio.org

2006-04-20 Thread Stephen Duncan Jr (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-551?page=comments#action_12375371 ] Stephen Duncan Jr commented on LUCENE-551: -- Also, please upload the various lucene contrib jars if possible. > Make Lucene - Java 1.9.1 Available in Maven2 repository

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-548) Sort bug using ParallelMultiSearcher

2006-04-20 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-548?page=comments#action_12375370 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-548: - It looks like problems could also happen with a MultiSearcher too. In general, don't use sort type AUTO... always explicitly specify

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-551) Make Lucene - Java 1.9.1 Available in Maven2 repository in iBibilio.org

2006-04-20 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-551?page=comments#action_12375365 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-551: And Maven 1.x http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/lucene/jars/ for those of us who haven't upgraded yet! > Make Lucene - Java 1.9.1

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-551) Make Lucene - Java 1.9.1 Available in Maven2 repository in iBibilio.org

2006-04-20 Thread Stephen Duncan Jr (JIRA)
Make Lucene - Java 1.9.1 Available in Maven2 repository in iBibilio.org --- Key: LUCENE-551 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-551 Project: Lucene - Java Type: Task Versions: 1.9