[off-topic] stop MS bashing please (was: Re: -Xrunhprof:cpu=times)

1999-06-12 Thread Louis-David Mitterrand
On Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 01:13:04PM +1000, Chris Kakris wrote: > Juergen Kreileder wrote: > > > > That's because it isn't implemented in pre1 & pre2. It will work with > > the next release. > > Excellent. Thanks. > > Chris (kill -9 Microsoft) Kakris ^ A bit (ok, a lot) of

Re: Redhat and Kaffe (was Re: First Step)

1999-06-12 Thread Godmar Back
Nelson, Maksim, > > Nelson Minar wrote: > > > > What do people here think about Redhat having Kaffe installed by > > default as the binary "java"? I think it's a bad idea because Kaffe > > really doesn't support enough Java to be useful, at least to me. On > > the other hand, I want to suppor

Re: -Xrunhprof:cpu=times

1999-06-12 Thread Juergen Kreileder
> Chris Kakris writes: Chris> Chris Kakris wrote: >> >> It seems that the -Xrunhprof:cpu=times option doesn't >> work with Linux_JDK_1.2_pre-release-v1 (I haven't downloaded v2 >> yet). I get the following output: Chris> It also happens with pre-release-v2. That's

Re: -Xrunhprof:cpu=times

1999-06-12 Thread Chris Kakris
Chris Kakris wrote: > > It seems that the -Xrunhprof:cpu=times option doesn't > work with Linux_JDK_1.2_pre-release-v1 (I haven't downloaded v2 > yet). I get the following output: It also happens with pre-release-v2. Chris (kill -9 Microsoft) Kakris Dynamic Solutions Pty Ltd http://www.d

Re: RedHat 6, JDK 1.2. native threads & JNI

1999-06-12 Thread Steve Fink
> So what can you do? Either of the following should work: > > * Run `configure' with the same prefix argument you've used for glibc 2.0.x > so that the same paths are used. > * Replace /lib/ld-linux.so.2 with a link to the dynamic linker from glibc > 2.1. > > You can even call the dynamic

JavaGrande

1999-06-12 Thread Matt Welsh
Hi Java Linuxers, JavaGrande (the ACM Conference on Java for High Performance Network Computing) is in San Francisco today and tomorrow -- see http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/conferences/java99/ for details. I'll be giving a dinner talk tonight on my system for enabling high-performance communication

Re: IBM released an early jdk for linux

1999-06-12 Thread Nelson Minar
>Is the 90 day evaluation license for real? I took this as a sign that this was only a prerelease alpha, that they will be having a more stable version soon. A bit frustrating, but I think it makes sense in this context. >On a serious note, how will the IBM JVM impact the Blackdown port? That's

jdk1.2pre2: Memory hungry??

1999-06-12 Thread Xuan Baldauf
Hello, I installed the JDK from ftp://tuiasi.ro/pub/lang/java/jdk/1.2/pre-v2/glibc2.1/jdk-1.2pre_v2-1.i386.rpm set PATH, NS_JAVA=true and THREADS_FLAG=green and tried to test out wether I got the right java version by dilbert:/usr/share # java -version For about 40 seconds nothing happened, b