Quoting Diego Pons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Think about it, perhaps we would have already JVM's on silicon on the
> cheap instead of needing these gigaherz machines to run java properly.
JVMs on silicon? Like, maybe, the Ajile AJ-100?
http://www.ajile.com/downloads/aj100.pdf
--
Breaking t
John R MacMillan wrote:
|>
Are there any JITs that save what they do? [...]
I've been told that IBM's JVM for iSeries (AS/400) does this, but I
don't know that first-hand.
Discussing the AS/400 is off-topic for this list, but if you have an
interest in JIT's or JVM's. you will probably fi
Steven Rubenstein wrote:
>
> does anyone know of a zip (not gzip or bzip2) utility that will run in
> linux?
You could write one in Java :-)
or:
http://www.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/
RedHat installs with this. Type "unzip" on your CLI and you may
discover you already have it!
-- Char
"Alexander V. Konstantinou" wrote:
>
> > PocketLinux and Kaffe are free (GPL) software, however non-GPL licenses
> > of the PocketLinux Kaffee JVM are available for a fee. Several PDA
>
> Is that legal? I thought once you GPLed code you cannot offer it under
> a different license since it is l
Mike Sprauve wrote:
>
> Can anyone tell me what the status is of the JDK
> running on Linux to the Intel StrongArm. I also need
> AWT support of that port
I don't know about Blackdown's JDK, but the Kaffe VM is the "real meat"
of PocketLinux, which runs on StrongArm devices. You didn't give an
> I have installed jsdk2.1 on winnt, then I run the startserver command.
> It displayed "end point created: :8080". then I open
> http://localhost:8080 with ie3.0,but can't found the address.
> why?
You are missing an important piece of software on your machine. It is
called "Linux." If you ins
Hey, is it possible to setup "read-only" participants? You know, so they
continue to get the wisdom of Java-Linux mailing list, but can't send anything
to the list?
William Reitwiesner wrote:
> At 08:14 PM 8/31/99 +, you wrote:
>
> Hi. The broken mailing-list software that this mailing lis
> And who thinks that the big heads at IBM have other reasons for supporting
> java [than] ... java hurts M$.
I don't work for IBM, but here is my best guess at a better reason for
them to support Java: the "write once run anywhere" promise.
Consider all of the systems that IBM *currently* ships
> If MS were so powerful
> and monopolistic they would have killed Linux somehow.
How? It has no parent company to drive out of business. Every single
user is empowered to be a develop, so they can't hire away the project
team.
Maybe they can just start killing people who use Linux.
-- Charle
> What would be the chance on getting
> IBM's code ported to Linux or is this the wrong forum to be bringing
> this up in.
I missed the previous discussion on this topic, so I don't know if this
was mentioned. IBM has committed itself to supporting OS/2 by keeping
its Java implementation up-to-d
a wrote:
> This works:
> javap -classpath $CLASSPATH java.lang.Object
>
> This don't work: (my.class is in same directory)
> javap -classpath $CLASSPATH my.class
> Class 'my.class' not found
try:
javap -classpath $CLASSPATH my
Drop the .class extension. It's looking for a class name, n
Robert Fitzsimons wrote:
> Your code running on Linux is unblocking (notifyAll) before, there
> is any thing waiting (wait) on the lock.
You're right -- that could happen in the code I sent out. Oops. It's
not happening on either of my systems. It's getting past the line
st.pause() on my syste
Hello,
Below is a some source code for a simple test. You invoke it with a
hostname that has a telnet port (for historical reasons):
java STest localhost
Anyway, it spawns two threads.
SThread opens a socket, unblocks a lock and then pends on a socket
read().
XThread waits on the l
> Is java on linux reliable enough to run on a box by itself for a
> considerable period of time, or would C be more appropriate ?
I have had NO PROBLEMS with Linux Java for server software. I've had
some problems with AWT-related stuff, but that's... well, the Java
burden at this point in time.
Eugene Teh wrote:
> I keep hearing people telling me that you can do this
> But I have never found info about how to do this?
Checkout www.twr.com for a product called "TowerJ". It's currently my
favorite product for doing this. Also, the Open Group
(www.opengroup.org) has a pro
> I also could not find any pricing information about turboj...
US$2000
(for HP-UX -- I assume it's the same for Linux)
> I suspect at this time it is a hard coded limit in java/vm.
Hmmm... possible, but why is it different for HP and Linux? Why is it,
for that matter, *worse* in JDK 1.1.6 on Linux than 1.1.3 on HP-UX?
-- Charles
Fellow Java Linux users:
I have a simple client/sever benchmark (code below) designed to see how
many simultanious open sockets I can sustain. The answer seems to be
about 250. This is really sad because the crufty HP-UX JDK 1.1.3
managed to make it to 1200. The exception is weird, too. Linux
18 matches
Mail list logo
