I get a core dump with 1.4.2 version of blackdown, where should I put
the log file?
--
''~``
( o o )
+--.oooO--(_)--Oooo.--+
We are limited, not by our abilities, but by our vision.
On x86 Linux (Debian 2.0) with Blackdown JDK1.1.7v1a and Swing 1.1,
$ javap javax.swing.JPanel | head
Compiled from JPanel.java
public synchronized class javax.swing.JPanel extends
javax.swing.JComponent implements javax.accessibility.Accessible
/* ACC_SUPER bit set */
{
static static {}
Topi Maenpaa wrote:
>
> I have noticed some things that do not seem to work right in your current JDK1.2
> release for Linux. The reason why I consider these bugs is that the same things
> work on Sun's implementation.
>
> 1. Is there a problem with the ActionListeners? I have noticed that som
I have noticed some things that do not seem to work right in your current JDK1.2
release for Linux. The reason why I consider these bugs is that the same things
work on Sun's implementation.
1. Is there a problem with the ActionListeners? I have noticed that some events do
not arrive to the li
Yes this is true except when the identifier is the name
for a inner class definition. An inner class ends up on the local
file systems with a name like "outerclassname$innerclassname.class".
Cheers
Chris
Paolo Ciccone wrote:
> > "AG" == Aaron Gaudio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> AG>
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999 12:15:29 -0500 (EST), Aaron Gaudio wrote:
>It was my understanding that Java source code is only guaranteed to work if
>it's ASCII, but I may be wrong about that. Obviously, though, ASCII
The JLS specifies that source code is either in ISO-Latin-1 or UNICODE.
(ISO-Latin-1 is
> "AG" == Aaron Gaudio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AG> It was my understanding that Java source code is only
AG> guaranteed to work if it's ASCII, but I may be wrong about
AG> that.
No, you're right but the example give *is* ASCII. The spec refers to
the encoding of the source, n
> "AP" == Alex Pozgaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AP> I just tried it out on Solaris (SunOS 5.6), both with jdk1.2
AP> and with jdk1.1.5.
AP> Under 1.2 it worked. Under 1.1.5, I got the same error message
AP> as you did.
AP> Oh, and something more: why in a wolrd would s
On 22-Jan-99 Alex Pozgaj wrote:
> Oh, and something more: why in a wolrd would somebody want to
> call his classes like *that*?
Well, this is the pleasure of the internationalization of Java.
Anyone who doesn't speak english as his/her motherlanguage has at least
this advantage: if you call cla
It was my understanding that Java source code is only guaranteed to work if
it's ASCII, but I may be wrong about that. Obviously, though, ASCII
seems the safe way to go. JDK 1.2 may have changed the internationalization
standards (officially or unofficially). Note that there could also be
a limita
Hi,
here is a bug on my linux (redhat 2.1). I'm not sure if it is a bug of
your port or a bug in Java. (or a bad limitation...)
try to compile and execute this:
public class Iso {
public static void main(String[] args) {
IsoäöüÄÖÜß.main(null);
}
}
class IsoäöüÄÖÜß {
public static void
Well the good news is that this is a known bug and the even better news is
that it has been fixed. You want to go grab the newest version of swing
1.0.2 it has a great number of fixes including the jmenus. you may also
want to check out the bug parade at java.sun.com they have a well indexed
se
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter
Schuller writes:
First, is there a list of knows bugs for Steve Byrne's JDK ports?
If this one's already been reported, I want to avoid duplicating
bug reports again.
Peter,
Thanks for the report.
I don't know if this has been addressed. Stev
Hi!
First, is there a list of knows bugs for Steve Byrne's JDK ports? If this one's
already been reported, I want to avoid duplicating bug reports again.
I'm not sure if this is a JDK or Swing bug, but as it worked on all previous
JDK's I've used, I'll report it here first and see what you think
14 matches
Mail list logo
