Hi,
I'm having a problem trying to run java on my 3970 iPaq. Initially I was
getting an error 'can't find libjava.so'. I fixed that by creating sym links
to the armv5tel architecture. But now I'm getting an error 'could not find
Java 2 Runtime Environment'.
Bling bling. You guys make sparc-linux fun.
--- Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is happy to announce the availability
> the Java 2 Standard Edition v1.4.1-beta for Linux on ix86 and
> SPARC.
>
> Please choose on
congratulations!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 10:05:31PM +0200, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is happy to announce the availability
> the Java 2 Standard Edition v1.4.1-beta for Linux on ix86 and SPARC.
Hurray!
Thanks, and keep up the good work.
--
Andreas Micklei
I
The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is happy to announce the availability
the Java 2 Standard Edition v1.4.1-beta for Linux on ix86 and SPARC.
Please choose one of our FTP mirrors for downloading:
http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/mirrors.html
Currently the SDK and the Runtime Environment are
From: Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Java Linux Public <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 01:46:17 +0100
> Please note that Debian packages for J2SE v1.3.1-02b-FCS are not
> available yet. We've completly reworked the packaging for Debian, the
> new packages will be available
leder wrote:
>The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is happy to announce the availability of
>the Java 2 Standard Edition v1.3.1-02b-FCS for Linux on i386, PowerPC
>and Sparc.
>
>Please choose one of our FTP mirrors for downloading:
>http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/mirrors.html
>
>
At :28 03 Mar 2002 +0800, PChaos wrote:
> what's the meaning "FCS" in "v1.3.1-02b-FCS"?
> anybody know ?
"First Customer Ship"
- Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Hello,Juergen Kreileder!
what's the meaning "FCS" in "v1.3.1-02b-FCS"?
anybody know ?
At 2002-03-29 01:26:00 you wrote:
>The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is happy to announce the availability of
>the Java 2 Standard Edition v1.3.1-02b-FCS for Linux on i386, PowerPC
&
Please note that Debian packages for J2SE v1.3.1-02b-FCS are not
available yet. We've completly reworked the packaging for Debian, the
new packages will be available next week.
Juergen
--
Juergen Kreileder, Blackdown Java-Linux Team
http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux.html
Run
The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is happy to announce the availability of
the Java 2 Standard Edition v1.3.1-02b-FCS for Linux on i386, PowerPC
and Sparc.
Please choose one of our FTP mirrors for downloading:
http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/mirrors.html
Both the J2SDK 1.3.1-02b and the J2RE
M
>To: Java Linux Public
>Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Java 2 Standard Edition v1.3.1-02a-FCS for Linux/ppc
>
>
>
>The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is happy to announce the availability of
>the Java 2 Standard Edition v1.3.1-02a-FCS for Linux on PowerPC.
>
>Please choose one of our FTP
Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is happy to announce the availability of
> the Java 2 Standard Edition v1.3.1-02a-FCS for Linux on i386.
Thank you again to Juergen and the Blackdown team for another fine
p
4478223).
Yes, it has the fix mentioned in 4469343. (4478223 is for 1.4)
Juergen
--
Juergen Kreileder, Blackdown Java-Linux Team
http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux.html
Run Java 2 SE v1.3.1 on your iPAQ:
http://www.handhelds.org/piper
Excellent, congratulations!
Quick question: is this based off the Sun 1.3.1_02 source? In
particular, there's a JVMPI fix Sun put into 1.3.1_01 that I'm wondering
if is in this release (BugParade ID 4478223).
Thanks,
John
--
T
> The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is happy to announce the availability of
> the Java 2 Standard Edition v1.3.1-02a-FCS for Linux on i386.
Good work! When can we expect a PPC version of V1.3.1?
Many Thanks,
Alex
---
> The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is happy to announce the availability of
> the Java 2 Standard Edition v1.3.1-02a-FCS for Linux on i386.
We'd appreciate your efforts.
I noticed drawing performance of Java 2D has been
improved clearly from Blackdown 1.3.1-FCS and Sun's
1.3.1. Bes
The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is happy to announce the availability of
the Java 2 Standard Edition v1.3.1-02a-FCS for Linux on i386.
Please choose one of our FTP mirrors for downloading:
http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/mirrors.html
Both the J2SDK 1.3.1-02a and the J2RE 1.3.1-02a include
nux Team is happy to announce the availability of
> the Java 2 Standard Edition v1.3.1-FCS for Linux on i386.
>
> Please choose one of our FTP mirrors for downloading:
> http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/mirrors.html
>
> Both the J2SDK 1.3.1 and the J2RE 1.3.1 include the Java Plug-
Is there a list somewhere that identifies how this ( or any JDK for that
matter ) is different from Sun's official JDK 1.3.1 for Linux x86? ( e.g.:
additional bug fixes, etc. )
John
>
> The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is happy to announce the availability of
> the Java 2 St
The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is happy to announce the availability of
the Java 2 Standard Edition v1.3.1-FCS for Linux on i386.
Please choose one of our FTP mirrors for downloading:
http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/mirrors.html
Both the J2SDK 1.3.1 and the J2RE 1.3.1 include the Java Plug
Hi, all,
First of all, many thanks are owed to the Blackdown group, most recently for
their JDK 1.3.0 Debian packages.
My only complaint about Java 2 on Linux these days is the poor text rendering.
Please have a look at the example at
http://www.npl.uiuc.edu/~fegray/java-render/
It shows
I still can't resolve the question in Issue 151 now.
I have put two System.out.println("ok") statements before and after
System.loadLibrary("IO"),and I delete all statements in c method. And when I run
compiled
project,those two "ok" are printed, and then the same error information are printed:
Java 2 Runtime and
Linux Redhat 6.1
I tried setting a
class path in the .bashrc file and when I tried to run a program I would get a
core dump with a segmentation fault. Is there a solution to this
problem. Also, what is the exact format for setting the CLASSPATH
environment in the bash
"Sun announced several course corrections today. For one thing, the company will
remove licensing and royalty payments for the desktop version of the software,
Java 2 Standard Edition, beginning Jan. 31."
gee, maybe i'll be back in the alpha/linux porting business again.
gat
Sco
7;s brain-dead
> > license, they own all changes to derivative works. I agree that
> > credit should be given where it is due.
> >
> > >
> > > This is the text:
> > > "Inprise and Sun Microsystems have taken a big step toward
> > > maintainin
tep toward
> > maintaining open, standards-based network computing architectures
> > that utilize technologies like Linux and the Java 2 platform,"
> > said Dale Fuller, Interim CEO and President of Inprise."
> >
> >
> > I think it is the drawback of the "Op
Hi,
are there any plans from blackdown or Sun/Inprise to support Java 2
on 2.0.x kernels (or libc5 systems)? Not everybody wants to
update his system...
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen
> Paolo Ciccone writes:
Paolo> example. JBuilder has Emacs emulation, with the standard
Paolo> Swing of 1.2.2 if you press Alt-d or Ctrl-space Swing will
Paolo> pass also the "d" or the blank in the editor. While the
Paolo> event is processed correctly the extra character is
I've tried to stay out of this thread as much as I could; but since Paolo
is going to take this back to the "big picture" I'd like to take a second
here and say something, 'cause I perfer the big picture to the pissing wars
this could become (but thankfully hasn't yet (think "GNU/Linux" vs "Linux"
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 12:07:07AM -0500, Nelson Minar wrote:
> I think we can all work together on this. A lot of us in the Linux
> community are annoyed and mystified by Sun's years-long snubbing of
> Linux in the Java world. It honestly makes no sense. The press release
> that came out today di
I think we can all work together on this. A lot of us in the Linux
community are annoyed and mystified by Sun's years-long snubbing of
Linux in the Java world. It honestly makes no sense. The press release
that came out today did no good, either, ignoring the Blackdown
contribution entirely. But I
leases of the JDK will be ported to Linux together with the
other two main versions: Windows and Solaris. This is a big
improvement and is another key factor in evaluating Linux as a viable
platform. The MacOS still today has no Java 2 support, for what I
know.
Trying
>
> I think it is the drawback of the "Open Source" model. Technically,
> you can take any code and release it as yours after few changes.
>
Technically, this has nothing to do with the "Open Source" model.
Sun's JDK, the community license, or the blackdown port have little
in common with open
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Scott Murray wrote:
[snip]
> What were we supposed to think? As well, I've read three different press
> articles on this today, and none of them contained the word "Blackdown".
> If Inprise/Sun wanted to give credit to the Blackdown team for providing
> a base for their furthe
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Paolo Ciccone wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 04:39:07PM -0500, Derek Glidden wrote:
[snip]
> > It looks like either someone at Inprise or at Sun isn't playing fair.
>
> We actually are. We didn't say that this is a clean port, in fact we
> are giving credit to Blackdown for
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 01:03:25AM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
>
> Early effort... Come on.
>
> Getting the VM running is the major part of the port. The step from
> 1.2 to 1.2.2 is so small that it nearly doesn't effect the port at
> all.
Well, you're free to think in this way but we had
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 06:28:29PM -0500, Jacob Nikom wrote:
> But it does matter how it was claimed. If the work was done by
> Inprise it is one thing, if it is only relabeling of Blackdown
> code, it is another.
yes, that would be plain and simple theft. We didn't "relabelled"
Blackdown JDK, wh
> Paolo Ciccone writes:
Paolo> We actually are. We didn't say that this is a clean port,
Paolo> in fact we are giving credit to Blackdown for the
Paolo> port. This has been done with the press at the Java Expo in
Paolo> New York and I personally posted here and on /. about ou
1.2.2 release.
>
> Not to dis you or your company's efforts, but if this is actually a
> "clean" implementation of the JDK straight from Sun sources and never
> having touched the Blackdown code, then I find the contents of
> jdk1.2.2/jre/README.linux to be rather
n-dead
license, they own all changes to derivative works. I agree that
credit should be given where it is due.
>
> This is the text:
> "Inprise and Sun Microsystems have taken a big step toward
> maintaining open, standards-based network computing architectures
> that utilize te
that utilize technologies like Linux and the Java 2 platform,"
said Dale Fuller, Interim CEO and President of Inprise."
I think it is the drawback of the "Open Source" model. Technically,
you can take any code and release it as yours after few changes.
It is interesting wha
Brian Pomerantz wrote:
> It doesn't matter who did the work on it. Sun owns the rights to
> any work done to their JDK. When the Blackdown group sends patches
> back to Sun, Sun can do with those patches what they want, including
> give them to Inprise to do their own work.
Legally speaking, yo
Paolo Ciccone wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 12:31:28PM -0500, Scott Murray wrote:
> > Without native threads support, this release is IMO useless for running
> > any kind of serious Java applications on Linux.
>
> I disagree, we have a couple of very big applications running under this
> JDK,
contents of
> jdk1.2.2/jre/README.linux to be rather suspicious:
>
> README.linux for Java 2 SDK Version 1.2.1 for Linux, pre-release 1
> Steve Byrne
> 29/8/1999
>
> This is the Blackdown Java-Linux port of the Java 2 SDK Version 1.2.1.
>
> [etc...]
>
> It
lementation of the JDK straight from Sun sources and never
having touched the Blackdown code, then I find the contents of
jdk1.2.2/jre/README.linux to be rather suspicious:
README.linux for Java 2 SDK Version 1.2.1 for Linux, pre-release 1
Steve Byrne
29/8/1999
This is the Blackdown Java-Li
Doug Robinson wrote:
| All of this interesting stuff but what about PPC &
| sparc-linux & alpha & all that?
As I've mentioned earlier, a Compaq-representative (former Digital)
announced first half of November that a jdk1.2-port is scheduled for
late Q4 (which really means: christmas-pre
>> Without native threads support, this release is IMO useless for running
>> any kind of serious Java applications on Linux.
>Realistically, I'm sure it's just a matter of time.
I suspect they'll get native threads out soon, too. I also expect
they'll end up needing to communicate some with the
A serious Java app "must" have native threads if:
a) It must use SMP (and the box it's running on has it),
b) It wasn't written well to deal with all threading models (for example,
non-preemptive threads) found under Java.
Since all serious applications are well written :-), perhaps Scott's
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 07:18:08PM +0100, Peter Schuller wrote:
> > running the Linux kernel v 2.2.5 and GLibC v 2.1, 32 megabytes RAM
>
> Why on earth would it only support 2.2.5? Why not any 2.2.x kernel?
> Is there any difference that is significant for a JDK?
>
> I'm downloading it anyway
Hi
All of this interesting stuff but what about PPC &
sparc-linux & alpha & all that?
dkr
--
The Office of Doug Robinson.These types are not "abstract"; they are as
[EMAIL PROTECTED]real as int and float. - Doug McIlroy
---
I've now run the matrix bench over all hot VM's:
BlackdownJDK1.2.2RC3, SunInpriceJDK1.2.2RC1, IBMJDK1.1.8,
BlackdownJDK1.2PreV2, all running RedHat 6.1 on the same machine, a
PentiumIII@600 MHz
Results are here:
http://nicewww.cern.ch/~hoschek/colt/V1.0Beta4/doc/cern/colt/matrix/doc-files/Perform
Hi
> Without native threads support, this release is IMO useless for running
> any kind of serious Java applications on Linux.
Realistically, I'm sure it's just a matter of time.
> While I will admit that I myself have been sometimes frustrated by the
> speed of the Blackdown porting team, they
> running the Linux kernel v 2.2.5 and GLibC v 2.1, 32 megabytes RAM
Why on earth would it only support 2.2.5? Why not any 2.2.x kernel?
Is there any difference that is significant for a JDK?
I'm downloading it anyway to see if it works on 2.2.13...
--
/ Peter Schuller
PGP userID: 0x5584BD
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 12:31:28PM -0500, Scott Murray wrote:
> Without native threads support, this release is IMO useless for running
> any kind of serious Java applications on Linux.
I disagree, we have a couple of very big applications running under this
JDK, including JBuilder, and the perfo
ttp://www.newsalert.com/bin/story?StoryId=CoeYuubWbu0zuvteXmW
> >
> > Their J2SE 1.2.2 RC1 is available at:
> >
> > http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/earlyAccess/j2sdk122/
> >
> > and here's their "System Requirements":
> >
> > This
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nelson Minar) writes:
> Looking at the output of the Blackdown team in the past six months I
> think it's fairly clear why Sun is looking elsewhere.
>
> I really don't want to be too critical of Blackdown. They've done a
> lot of really good work in a very difficult envir
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Paolo Ciccone wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 09:19:28AM -0500, Scott Murray wrote:
> > I'm praying that the Blackdown team continues it's work if this is what Sun
> > consider a useful release. I'm really curious as to why the hell Sun and
> > Inprise went off on their own
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 06:15:14PM +0100, Robb Shecter wrote:
> Paolo Ciccone wrote:
>
> > ... this version
> > includes JPDA and several Swing bugs that we found ...
>
> Do you mean "bug fixes?"
Yeah, I still have to get my first coffe :).
--
Paolo
-
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 03:47:23PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I though the current 1.2.2 rc was 3, not 1? Have Sun picked up an older copy
> to release on their site?
The Sun/Inprise port is not the same of Blackdown's, that's why the release
number is different. The Sun/Inprise port is a
Paolo Ciccone wrote:
> ... this version
> includes JPDA and several Swing bugs that we found ...
Do you mean "bug fixes?"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
I wrote directly to Sun about it (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
attached below). I'll try to post the results of both JDK 1.2.2 ports
-- what I thought was Blackdown *and* Sun, and the new port from Sun --
to the Volano Report today or tomorrow.
John Neffenger
John Neffenger wrote:
>
> Dear Sun,
>
Scott Murray wrote:
> I though the current 1.2.2 rc was 3, not 1? Have Sun picked up an older copy
> to release on their site?
They appear to be two different projects now - Sun/Inprise announcing
today their RC1 and Blackdown their RC3.
It would be nice to have a comment from Blackdown as to e
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 09:19:28AM -0500, Scott Murray wrote:
> I'm praying that the Blackdown team continues it's work if this is what Sun
> consider a useful release. I'm really curious as to why the hell Sun and
> Inprise went off on their own when the Blackdown port is available...
Besides e
>I'm praying that the Blackdown team continues it's work if this is
>what Sun consider a useful release. I'm really curious as to why the
>hell Sun and Inprise went off on their own when the Blackdown port is
>available...
Looking at the output of the Blackdown team in the past six months I
think
is available at:
>
> http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/earlyAccess/j2sdk122/
>
> and here's their "System Requirements":
>
> This version of the Java 2 SDK is supported on Intel Pentium platform
> running the Linux kernel v 2.2.5 and GLibC v 2.1, 32 megab
sage -
From: Scott Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 1999 9:19 PM
Subject: Sun and Inprise Java 2 announcement
> Check out:
>
> http://www.newsalert.com/bin/story?StoryId=CoeYuubWbu0zuvteXmW
>
> Their J2SE 1.2.
Check out:
http://www.newsalert.com/bin/story?StoryId=CoeYuubWbu0zuvteXmW
Their J2SE 1.2.2 RC1 is available at:
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/earlyAccess/j2sdk122/
and here's their "System Requirements":
This version of the Java 2 SDK is supported on Intel P
I think that announcement has been postponed.
Check this out:
http://www.crn.com/dailies/digest/breakingnews.asp?ArticleID=11777
Riyad Kalla wrote:
> http://www.computerworld.com/home/news.nsf/all/9912035javalinux
>
> What is this? I thought Sun was going to continue helping
> Blackdown to get
http://www.computerworld.com/home/news.nsf/all/9912035javalinux
What is this? I thought Sun was going to continue helping
Blackdown to get the port done, now it looks like Inprise
and Sun are going to do it ( Java - JBuilder 3 love) and
there is no sign of Blackdown in here.
Did you (Blackdown)
> From: Barnet Wagman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Has anyone successfully used the java 2 profiler (under Linux kernel
> 2.0)?
> When I run something like
>
> java -green -Xrunhprof:file=x.prof,cpu=times -ms32m -mx96m
> ...
>
> I keep getting 'Seg
Has anyone successfully used the java 2 profiler (under Linux kernel 2.0)?
When I run something like
java -green -Xrunhprof:file=x.prof,cpu=times -ms32m -mx96m
...
I keep getting 'Segmentation fault's.
--
Barnet Wagman
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rwk,
The java 2 implementation of Blackdown is great; a lot faster than
java 1, but there's a little deadlock in GUI's which stops it from use
for production systems, for the rest: good stuff.
Joost
>>>>> "Jacob" == Jacob Nikom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> write
I think Blackdown port is Java 2. What specific package do you need?
Jacob Nikom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Does anyone know even roughly when Java 2 will be ported to Linux?
>
> I am planing to start a project, and would prefer to wait for Java 2 if
> it won't be t
Does anyone know even roughly when Java 2 will be ported to Linux?
I am planing to start a project, and would prefer to wait for Java 2 if
it won't be too long.
Thanks,
Dick Kreutzer
AmeriCom Inc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
I had the impression Sun was going to take on the project, obviously its just
another PR move, just like you said, to combat IBM. Well seeing as how we are
getting a release about every 7 months or so, with all of Sun's help, we should
have 1.3 final ported by the end of 2010.
-Riyad
Nelson Mina
>Well, according the article at InfoWorld, Sun are working with Blackdown
>to do the port so I guess they'll continue to be closely involved with
>Java on Linux.
So in other words, this is business as usual? The press release made
it sound like Sun was doing something new. Then again, they were
r
Riyad Kalla wrote:
> I'm giddy like a school girl to see how it turns out.
>
> Would Blackdown disolve if this comes true?
Well, according the article at InfoWorld, Sun are working with Blackdown
to do the port so I guess they'll continue to be closely involved with
Java on Linux.
Robbie
-
Save your giddiness for when you actually have it running on your machine.
It is a lot more satisifying that way.
Thus spake Riyad Kalla on Wed, 20 Oct 1999:
> I'm giddy like a school girl to see how it turns out.
>
> Would Blackdown disolve if this comes true?
>
> Cynthia Jeness wrote:
>
> >
I'm giddy like a school girl to see how it turns out.
Would Blackdown disolve if this comes true?
Cynthia Jeness wrote:
> Any comments/insights about the following excerpt from an October 18
> InfoWorld article?
>
> ...
> Meanwhile, Sun Microsystems is preparing to release in early 2000 a
> J
Any comments/insights about the following excerpt from an October 18
InfoWorld article?
...
Meanwhile, Sun Microsystems is preparing to release in early 2000 a
Java2-compliant JVM for Linux that brings the performance, functions,
and Java HotSpot features of the latest Java specifications to th
Sandy Ward writes:
> Does anyone have the dates when Java 2 for Linux might be released from Sun?
I should be clear: SUN doesn't do ports of Java 2 to Linux. The Blackdown
porting team does (see http://java.blackdown.org).
I'm trying to get pre-release 2 put together as we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Does anyone have the dates when Java 2 for Linux might be released from Sun?
Never, it looks like.
JDK 1.2 (AKA Java 2) is being ported by the blackdown team, not by Sun
(although I gather Sun people are helping out).
/ Peter Schuller
- ---
Does anyone have the dates when Java 2 for Linux might be released from Sun?
Sandy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sandy Ward writes:
> Does anyone have the dates when Java 2 for Linux might be released from Sun?
Uh...never, since they aren't doing it.
> Sandy
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
I am having trouble getting java 2 running on my redhat 5.2 PC(386)
system
How do I tell what version of glibc I have if any?
thanks
bash$ java SimpleExample
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
/home/java/java2/jdk1.2/jre/lib/i386/libfontmanage
r.so: libstdc++-li
Linux guys!
Does this work for JDK1.2. I have got a glibc linux yet so I can't test this
code personally.
Cheers
Peter
__ Forward Header __
Subject: sun.audio.* in Java 2 Platform
Author: Peter Pilgrim at London
Date:27/04/
Blackdown Java-Linux Porting Team member Kevin Hendricks posted the
announcement today about the availability of a pre-release version
of Java 2 (aka JDK 1.2) for PPC Linux:
-
Announcing Pre-Release version 1 of Sun&#
Hi,
I downloaded JDK1.2 and after I downloaded the script to fix the library
problem everything is running fine. I'm using RedHat 5.2 and KDE 1.1. The speed
is no there yet if I compared it with NT. In one of my application I'm using
internal frames and when I resized the main window the redraw
Yes, I read the README.
And you suggestion fixed the linking problem.
Thanks,
Russ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/05/99 01:49:32 PM
To: Russell Pridemore@LEXMARK
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Java 2 initial impressions
>>>>> Russ Pridemore writes:
Russ> -
> Russ Pridemore writes:
Russ> - The invocation API stuff has changed. I wrote a little C wrapper
Russ> to launch the non-GUI stuff as a daemon. I used to link
Russ> it with -L/usr/jdk/lib/i686/green_threads -ljava
Russ> Substituting -L/usr/jdk1.2/jre
Russ Pridemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - RMI seems to have stopped working. I was able, with 1.1.7,
> to run the Swing GUI on a NT machine, talking to the
> the rest of the java application on Linux via RMI. The
> Sun JDK on NT now complains:
> java.rmi.Con
Blackdown, you guys rock! I downloaded pre-1 and
it looks really good for the most part. I'm running a
stock RedHat 5.2 distribution and most things are
working after I ran the shell script posted to
http://www.blackdown.org/cgi-bin/jdk/incoming?id=424;user=guest;selectid=424
I haven't spent mu
> > for those of you checking the list often, and chomping at the bit,
> > the ftp.tux.org mirror just finieshed mirrioring 1.2.tgz (all 36Megs if it)
>
> just tried to access it.
> Result: User anonymous access denied.
>
> Sorry folks, private eyes only ;-)
Have to revise the above statement:
> for those of you checking the list often, and chomping at the bit,
> the ftp.tux.org mirror just finieshed mirrioring 1.2.tgz (all 36Megs if it)
just tried to access it.
Result: User anonymous access denied.
Sorry folks, private eyes only ;-)
Oliver
___
for those of you checking the list often, and chomping at the bit,
the ftp.tux.org mirror just finieshed mirrioring 1.2.tgz (all 36Megs if it)
-jj-
--
http://www.cs.earlham.edu/~jeremiah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
A short note for glibc 2.1 users:
Native threads don't work with glibc 2.1 because of a problem
with pthread_create.
A special glibc 2.1 version will be available in a few days.
Juergen
--
Juergen Kreileder, Universitaet Dortmund, Lehrstuhl Informatik V
Baroper Strasse 301, D-44221
I've uploaded a pre-release version of Java 2 for x86 Linux. It should be
making its way out to the mirrors in the next day or so.
If you have a really good, fast connection to the net, and you're willing to
maybe have to do some environment hacking to get things to work, please ch
>From a pretty good source at LinuxWorld -- Sun's going to allow the
release of Java 2 for Linux with the socket bug (which apparently only
affects multicasting on multi-homed machines running 2.0.3)
*THURSDAY*! Which is 25 hours from now.
And there was much rejoicing.
--
Michael Lort
> Uli Luckas writes:
> > Why can IBM publish an 'almost' ready java 2 VM and why can't the linux
> > porters?
> > Maybe they can and don't know it?
>
> I'm sorry, it clearly states in our license agreement (which I don't think I
> ca
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
