> The download page for the sun 1.3 beta states that 'both client
> and server' jits are bundled.
% java -version
java version "1.3.0beta"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.0beta-b07)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.3.0beta-b04, mixed mode)
% java -hotspot -version
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, noisebrain wrote:
>
> The download page for the sun 1.3 beta states that 'both client
> and server' jits are bundled. I don't see the server -
java -server starts the HotSpot-Server-Version
java -server -version:
java version "1.3.0beta"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environme
>Can someone explain to me the advantage of JIT compilers? It's
>obviously faster .. I've been doing some recusion testing and the Sun
>JDK 1.3 for Linux runs on average 3 times faster than the jdk 1.2.2
>rc4 from blackdown.org.
I just happened to read an article benchmarking Java vs. C on severa
Patrick Lacson wrote:
>
> Can someone explain to me the advantage of JIT compilers? It's obviously
> faster .. I've been doing some recusion testing and the Sun JDK 1.3 for
> Linux
> runs on average 3 times faster than the jdk 1.2.2 rc4 from blackdown.org.
Hotspot is a jit compiler. It is jit c
Steve Byrne wrote:
>
> Matt Lord writes:
> > Do you plan on porting HotSpot if and when Sun releases the source code?
>
> If Sun will license us the code, we'll port it.
For what it's worth, Java Lobby reported a few days ago that Sun is
planning -- says Alan Baratz -- to release HotSpot sourc
On Thu, 29 Apr 1999, Dimitris Vyzovitis wrote:
> Uncle George wrote:
>
> > What was more interesting about the proj is that they say there is little to do
> > for any cpu architecture to get it to run. :-
> > gat
> >
>
> Which - to get it even furter - combined with the fact that "... will
Uncle George wrote:
> What was more interesting about the proj is that they say there is little to do
> for any cpu architecture to get it to run. :-
> gat
>
Which - to get it even furter - combined with the fact that "... will be available
for downloads free of charge for developers soon..
What was more interesting about the proj is that they say there is little to do
for any cpu architecture to get it to run. :-
gat
Dimitris Vyzovitis wrote:
> Nelson Minar wrote:
>
> > >When Sun formerly stated that Hotspot would be a commercial product
> > >there was not much competition ar
Nelson Minar wrote:
> >When Sun formerly stated that Hotspot would be a commercial product
> >there was not much competition around. Now fierce competition is here.
>
> And reading between the lines, maybe Hotspot isn't that hot afterall.
> The speedups they claim (2-4 times, presumably over a si
Paul Michael Reilly wrote:
>
> There are many references to HotSpot being a "server-side" solution.
> This pains me greatly because I think it means Swing performance is
> still slower than watching grass grow. I hope someone can
> definitively say that Swing performance in particular (e.g. JTab
>When Sun formerly stated that Hotspot would be a commercial product
>there was not much competition around. Now fierce competition is here.
And reading between the lines, maybe Hotspot isn't that hot afterall.
The speedups they claim (2-4 times, presumably over a simple JIT?) are
nice, but not e
Paul Michael Reilly wrote:
>
> The announcement (http://www.javasoft.com/pr/1999/04/pr990427-01.html)
> says: "... The Java HotSpot performance engine will be available free
> of charge for download at
> http://java.sun.com/products/hotspot/index.htm"
>
> There are many references to HotSpot be
> > Oliver Fels writes:
> > > I dont think so.
> > > According to the last statements from SUN HotSpot will be sold
> > > seperately as a commercial product.
> >
> > Hunh? Can you cite a reference?
> >
> > The announcement (http://www.javasoft.com/pr/1999/04/pr990427-01.html)
> > says: "...
> Oliver Fels writes:
> > I dont think so.
> > According to the last statements from SUN HotSpot will be sold
> > seperately as a commercial product.
>
> Hunh? Can you cite a reference?
>
> The announcement (http://www.javasoft.com/pr/1999/04/pr990427-01.html)
> says: "... The Java HotSpot
> According to the last statements from SUN HotSpot will be sold
> separately as a commercial product.
The press release said "free" about five times.
M.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
Oliver Fels writes:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > Well,
> > it seems that hotspot is out there - but not yet for linux.
> > Is there any chance that the porting team get their hands on the src
> > (and do their miracle again)?
>
> I dont think so.
> According
On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 08:47:29AM +0200, Oliver Fels wrote:
> > Well,
> > it seems that hotspot is out there - but not yet for linux.
> > Is there any chance that the porting team get their hands on the src
> > (and do their miracle again)?
> I dont think so.
> According to the last statements fr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Well,
> it seems that hotspot is out there - but not yet for linux.
> Is there any chance that the porting team get their hands on the src
> (and do their miracle again)?
I dont think so.
According to the last statements from SUN HotSpot will be so
Here is a email I sent to Sun concering there licnese. It seems to me
the Sun Community Licens precludes me distributing my work if I include Sun
source.
I see no easy answer here.
Mike
I have a question.
I have developed a windowing System written almost entirely in Java.
Doing this I repla
> Sorry but that whole "hot spot" thing looks like vapor ware. Besides
> even if Sun is able to get "something" out the door they have already
> stated that it will be given to "paying customers only". Instead of
Easy answer on this: Let´s wait and see.
> waiting and hoping that Sun will do us a
On Thu, 25 Feb 1999, Oliver Fels wrote:
> > > Both TYA and the ShuJIT are free JIT's which work with Linux and JDK 1.1 ...
> > > I am assuming that porting them to work with JDK 1.2 will not be (too)
> > > difficult.
> >
> > I know nothing, but I've heard that the interface for JITs has changed
21 matches
Mail list logo
