Hi
I have successfuly folowed your advise. After rekompiling the kernel so that I now can
address 4G of memory, change the max #processes plus changed the thread stacksize i
now can create more than 12 000 threads (which is pretty cool i thing), the limit must
now be the 4G addressspace limit.
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 07:06:24PM +0100, Vincent Touquet wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 09:56:57AM -0800, Hui Huang wrote:
> >Default stack size is 512k. You need 3500 * 512k = 1750M address space
> >for 3500 threads. Try -Xss96k. Also check your limit on max #processes
> >(ulimit -u), you can't
Vincent Touquet wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 09:56:57AM -0800, Hui Huang wrote:
Default stack size is 512k. You need 3500 * 512k = 1750M address space
for 3500 threads. Try -Xss96k. Also check your limit on max #processes
(ulimit -u), you can't create more threads than that limit either.
Is th
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 09:56:57AM -0800, Hui Huang wrote:
>Default stack size is 512k. You need 3500 * 512k = 1750M address space
>for 3500 threads. Try -Xss96k. Also check your limit on max #processes
>(ulimit -u), you can't create more threads than that limit either.
Is there a common place whe
Nathan Bryant wrote:
Daniel Malmkvist wrote:
To my supprise i could not have more then ~3500 threads at the same time.
I got a OutOfMemoryException, but there was plenty of system memory left
(the JVM only ha about 10% of system physical memory).
Address space might be a limiting factor in a 32
Daniel Malmkvist wrote:
To my supprise i could not have more then ~3500 threads at the same time.
I got a OutOfMemoryException, but there was plenty of system memory left
(the JVM only ha about 10% of system physical memory).
Address space might be a limiting factor in a 32-bit machine. Assumin
