Hi Jeff and Doug,
I've just finished reading Chapter 1 of Lucene in Action (sample chapter
from Manning) and I've ordered a copy. The sample chapter was pretty
useful in giving me an idea of how Lucene will fit into my app and I
think it'll do the trick nicely with a bit of elbow grease on my p
I must admit that I have not downloaded the source yet. But a quick
question, does it deal w/ aggregate functions and group by clauses?
Thanks!
Ray,
On 9/17/05, markharw00d <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Basically your lucene_query function will return a true/false in one
> of the query predica
I like Erik's suggestion here as a starting point. I would guess you might
find some direction in the Scorer class, but I haven't gone through this in
detail.
Conceptually a sliding weight based on proximity sounds correct...
-- jeff
On Sep 18, 2005, at 3:39 PM, James Huang wrote:
> > So the
Jeff Rodenburg wrote:
My suggestion to you: pick up a copy of Lucene in Action. [ ...]
The authors lurk on this list.
They're pretty chatty for lurkers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lurker
But good advice nonetheless!
Cheers,
Doug
---
On Sep 18, 2005, at 7:52 PM, Philip Peterson wrote:
Is there a way to, at run time, boost one index over another in a
ParallelMultiSearcher.
So if I have 4 indexes a,b,c,d and user A searches their results lean
toward index a
and user B searches his results are boosted toward index b etc.
Than
Hello,
Is there a way to, at run time, boost one index over another in a
ParallelMultiSearcher.
So if I have 4 indexes a,b,c,d and user A searches their results lean
toward index a
and user B searches his results are boosted toward index b etc.
Thanks so much in advance,
I tried to see if there
On Sep 18, 2005, at 3:39 PM, James Huang wrote:
So the question is, is there a way to overriding score
calculation at runtime? In the lucene/search package,
I see interfaces like Scorer, Weight and methods like
Query.createWeight(). This looks promising.
There are several ways to adjust scorin
Kevin -
You've come to the right list to get information to help you make a
decision. That said, the responsible answer to your question will be "it
depends". The supporter in me says Lucene is your best choice, hands down.
Your questions aren't as straightforward as you might expect. Lucene is
Hi folks,
I'd like to add seach functionality to a homegrown webapp I'm building
that will store and display news articles. I've been looking through the
Lucene Wiki, FAQ and tutorials and it looks like it will be able to
provide the functionality I'll need. But before I commit to a given
tech
--- Jeff Rodenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> trimming the post further:
>
> On 9/18/05, James Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >The problem is quite generic, I believe. What I
> like to do is similar to
> > LIA-ch6, i.e. to find a "good Chinese Hunan-style
> restaurant near me." I
trimming the post further:
On 9/18/05, James Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >The problem is quite generic, I believe. What I like to do is similar to
> LIA-ch6, i.e. to find a "good Chinese Hunan-style restaurant near me." I
> prefer Hunan-style; however, if a good Human-style one is 12 m
See comments below.
--- Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [trimming the post a bit]
>
> On Sep 18, 2005, at 11:51 AM, James Huang wrote:
> > The problem is quite generic, I believe. What I
> like
> > to do is similar to LIA-ch6, i.e. to find a "good
> > Chinese Hunan-style restaurant nea
[trimming the post a bit]
On Sep 18, 2005, at 11:51 AM, James Huang wrote:
The problem is quite generic, I believe. What I like
to do is similar to LIA-ch6, i.e. to find a "good
Chinese Hunan-style restaurant near me." I prefer
Hunan-style; however, if a good Human-style one is 12
miles, where t
On Sep 18, 2005, at 11:10 AM, James Huang wrote:
--- Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 18, 2005, at 10:24 AM, James Huang wrote:
--- Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Get back to using your DistanceComparatorSource,
and
couple that with
a SortField.FIELD_
--- Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 18, 2005, at 10:24 AM, James Huang wrote:
>
> > --- Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Get back to using your DistanceComparatorSource,
> and
> >> couple that with
> >> a SortField.FIELD_SCORE, like this:
> >>
> >> Sort
On Sep 18, 2005, at 10:24 AM, James Huang wrote:
--- Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Get back to using your DistanceComparatorSource, and
couple that with
a SortField.FIELD_SCORE, like this:
Sort sort = new Sort(new SortField[] {new
SortField("location",
new DistanceCompara
--- Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Get back to using your DistanceComparatorSource, and
> couple that with
> a SortField.FIELD_SCORE, like this:
>
> Sort sort = new Sort(new SortField[] {new
> SortField("location",
> new DistanceComparatorSource( you need>)),
> SortField.F
Hi,
I'm facing an issue with sounds-like queries. I've experimented with both
Apache Codec & the Phonetix library from Tangentum Technologies
(http://www.tangentum.biz/en/products/phonetix/faqs/index.html ) to see if I
could sort out the issue somehow using either of the libraries.
I've an
On Sep 17, 2005, at 7:00 PM, James Huang wrote:
I use a custom collector:
[...]
Then, use IndexSearcher.search(qry, collector);
So what happens if you get 10M results from a search?
This seems to work. What I wish for is that sorting is
done by the search engine itself, hoping for a bet
19 matches
Mail list logo
