Re: Getting list of committed documents

Hi, Can anyone please suggest or point in some directions. Regards. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Getting-list-of-committed-documents-tp4305258p4305503.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --

Re: Luke alternative

Hi Erick, Good to know, I'll try and help if I can. No Solr here, though, just pure Lucene. Best, Chris Sent from my iPhone > On 10 Nov 2016, at 15:56, Erick Erickson wrote: > > Please do work with Alan, he does good stuff ;)... > > In the meantime, you might be thinking of the LukeReqeust

Re: Luke alternative

Please do work with Alan, he does good stuff ;)... In the meantime, you might be thinking of the LukeReqeustHandler assuming you're using Solr. Best, Erick On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 5:32 AM, Alan Woodward wrote: > Hi Chris, > > I’ve been working sporadically on a webservice API called marple: >

Re: Lucene 6.3 faceting documentation

Great! Thanks so much! :-) Glen On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Shai Erera wrote: > We've removed the userguide a long time ago. We have a set of example files > under lucene-demo, e.g. here > https://lucene.apache.org/core/6_3_0/demo/src-html/org/ > apache/lucene/demo/facet/ > . > > Also, yo

Re: Lucene 6.3 faceting documentation

We've removed the userguide a long time ago. We have a set of example files under lucene-demo, e.g. here https://lucene.apache.org/core/6_3_0/demo/src-html/org/apache/lucene/demo/facet/ . Also, you can read some blog posts, start here: http://shaierera.blogspot.com/2012/11/lucene-facets-part-1.htm

Lucene 6.3 faceting documentation

I am looking for documentation on Lucene faceting. The most recent documentation I can find is for 4.0.0 here: http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_0_0/facet/org/apache/lucene/facet/doc-files/userguide.html Is there more recent documentation for 6.3.0? Or 6.x? Thanks, Glen

Re: Query parser and default operator

Thank you Dawid :) -- Paweł Róg On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Dawid Weiss wrote: > This does look odd. I filed this issue to track it: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7550 > > But I can't promise you I'll have the time to look into this any time > soon. Feel free to step dow

Re: Migrate BooleanQuery Lucene 4.9.0 to Lucene 6.0.3

Oliver, worked perfectly! Thanks a lot ! Best regards, Humberto On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Oliver Kaleske wrote: > Hi, > > try > BooleanQuery inner = new BooleanQuery.Builder().add(ownerQueryX, > Occur.SHOULD).add(groupQueryY, Occur.SHOULD).build(); > BooleanQuery con

Re: Luke alternative

Hi Chris, I’ve been working sporadically on a webservice API called marple: https://github.com/flaxsearch/marple . Very much a project in development, but more testers and contributors are always welcome! Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk > On 10 Nov 2016, a

Luke alternative

Hi I recently heard about an alternative (API?) to Luke for examining indexes. Can someone please point me to it? Thanks Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Query parser and default operator

This does look odd. I filed this issue to track it: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7550 But I can't promise you I'll have the time to look into this any time soon. Feel free to step down through the source and see why the difference is there (patches welcome!). On Wed, Nov 9, 2016

RE: Migrate BooleanQuery Lucene 4.9.0 to Lucene 6.0.3

Hi, try BooleanQuery inner = new BooleanQuery.Builder().add(ownerQueryX, Occur.SHOULD).add(groupQueryY, Occur.SHOULD).build(); BooleanQuery constrainedQuery = new BooleanQuery.Builder().add(inner, Occur.MUST).add(query, Occur.MUST).build(); You can also split this into several s

Re: Faceting : what are the limitations of Taxonomy (Separate index and hierarchical facets) and SortedSetDocValuesFacetField ( flat facets and no sidecar index) ?

Hi The reason IMO is historic - ES and Solr had faceting solutions before Lucene had it. There were discussions in the past about using the Lucene faceting module in Solr (can't tell for ES) but, sadly, I can't say I see it happening at this point. Regarding your other question, IMO the Lucene fa

Faceting : what are the limitations of Taxonomy (Separate index and hierarchical facets) and SortedSetDocValuesFacetField ( flat facets and no sidecar index) ?

Hi All, We all know that Lucene supports faceting by providing Taxonomy(Separate index and hierarchical facets) and SortedSetDocValuesFacetField ( flat facets and no sidecar index). Then why did solr and elastic search go for its own implementation ? ( that is, solr uses block j