Re: Handling Indian regional languages

Hi Robert Muir, we will check on this. Thanks a lot for the pointers. -- *K*umaran *R* On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 11:16 PM Robert Muir wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 2:04 AM Kumaran Ramasubramanian > wrote: > > > > For handling Indian regional languages, what is the

Handling Indian regional languages

For handling Indian regional languages, what is the advisable approach? 1. Indexing each language data(Tamil, Hindi etc) in specific fields like content_tamil, content_hindi with specific per field Analyzer like Tamil for content_tamil, HindiAnalyzer for content_hindi? 2. Indexing all language da

Re: currency based search using query time calculated field match with expression

Thanks a lot for your inputs Michael. I will check about FunctionQuery. Thanks again :-) -- Kumaran R Chennai, India On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 9:22 PM Michael Sokolov wrote: > Sorry I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to do. Maybe you > want to match a document having

Re: currency based search using query time calculated field match with expression

with 150 INR records). Any pointers to know about this in detail? Kumaran R Chennai, India On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 12:08 AM Michael Sokolov wrote: > Have you looked at the expressions module? It provides support for > user-defined computation using values from the index based on a

currency based search using query time calculated field match with expression

s. Thanks in advance -- Kumaran R Chennai, India

Re: Autocompletion based on one field in index

Hi All, Any input would be appreciated.. thanks in advance. Kumaran R On Tue, Mar 10, 2020, 11:44 PM Kumaran Ramasubramanian wrote: > > > Hi Mikhail > > Thanks for the input. But i would like to suggest title of the available > documents (for the query typed in search b

Re: Autocompletion based on one field in index

its help widget ) [image: Screenshot from 2020-03-10 23-40-14.png] -- *K*umaran *R* On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 2:44 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > Hi, > > org.apache.lucene.search.spell.DirectSpellChecker > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 8:14 AM Kumaran Ramasubramanian > > wr

Autocompletion based on one field in index

Hi All, I would like to compute autocompletion based on one field's data. For example, title field of a list of webpages. Is there anyway to achieve this? Regards Kumaran R

Index fields configuration - suggestions

arch https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/mapping.html https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/cluster-state.html -- Kumaran R

Re: Encryption at lucene index

I got it Erick.. Thank you.. - ​Kumaran R ​ On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > Encrypting the _tokens_ inevitably leads to reduced capabilities BTW. > Trivial example: > I have these tokens in my index > run > runner > running > runs > >

Re: Encryption at lucene index

Hi Ishan, thank you :-) - ​- Kumaran R ​ On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Harry Ochiai (Hitachi) has some index encryption solution, > https://www.slideshare.net/maggon/securing-solr-search-data-in-the-cloud > I think it

Re: Encryption at lucene index

Hi Erick, i want to encrypt some fields of an document which has personal identifiable information ( both indexed and stored data)... for eg: email, mobilenumber etc.. i am able to find LUCENE-6966 alone while googling it.. any related pointers in solr or latest lucene version? - ​- Kumaran R

Re: Encryption at lucene index

Hi Erick, Thanks for the information. Any pointers about encryption options in solr? -- Kumaran R On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:17 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > Encryption in Solr has a bunch of ramifications. Do you care about > > - encryption at rest or in memory? > - en

Encryption at lucene index

ith sorting. "More Like > This" would be unreliable. There are many other features of a robust search > engine that would be impacted, and an index with encrypted terms would be > useful for only exact matches, which usually results in a poor search > experience. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36604551/adding-encryption-to-solr-lucene-indexes -- Kumaran R

Re: Filters Vs queries - for terms more than 1024

ery$FilterStrategy.filteredBulkScorer(FilteredQuery.java:504) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.FilteredQuery$1.bulkScorer(FilteredQuery.java:150) If i use BooleanQuery and wrap it with ConstantScoreQuery, shall i use 1 lakh boolean clauses in booleanquery ? - ​- Kumaran R ​ On Wed, Jul 19,

Re: Filters Vs queries - for terms more than 1024

f you have many clauses. But like TermsQuery, BooleanFilter always consume all matching documents from all its clauses. So if you intersect it with a selective query, it is wasteful. Le mar. 18 juil. 2017 à 11:42, Kumaran Ramasubramanian a écrit : > ​Hi Adrien, > > Thanks for your in

Re: Filters Vs queries - for terms more than 1024

> FilterClause filterClause = new FilterClause(filter, > BooleanClause.Occur.SHOULD); > boolFilter.add(filterClause); > } Do you see any problem in using ​ TermsFilter over TermsQuery? btw, i will test with TermsQuery and let you know. ​--

Filters Vs queries - for terms more than 1024

teredScorer(FilteredQuery.java:542) > > at >> org.apache.lucene.search.FilteredQuery$FilterStrategy.filteredBulkScorer(FilteredQuery.java:504) > > at >> org.apache.lucene.search.FilteredQuery$1.bulkScorer(FilteredQuery.java:150) > > Any pointers are much appreciated... Thank you.. -- Kumaran R

Re: email field - analyzed and not analyzed in single field using custom analyzer

Hi Steve Thanks for the input. How to apply WordDelimiterGraphFilter / WordDelimiterFilter for email tokens alone using email regex ? i want to have only analyzed tokens for other tokens with other type of special characters... -- Kumaran R On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Steve Rowe

email field - analyzed and not analyzed in single field using custom analyzer

n my existing custom analyzer without using email analyzer ( perfieldanalyzer ) for email field.. And so i can apply this tokenizer for email terms of all fields.. - Kumaran R

Re: Recommended number of fields in one lucene index

gt; bytes[] bin1bytes = bin1ref.bytes; > > Snippet from: http://stackoverflow.com/a/34324561/1382168 -- Kumaran R On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:38 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > I think it is hard to come up with a general rule, but there is certainly a > per-field overhead. There are som

Recommended number of fields in one lucene index

all stored fields ( except field to be updated) and index everything again ( remove and add remaining fields ). While searching, i use _all_ blob field to search in texts of all fields data. -- Kumaran R

Re: Replacement for Filter-as-abstract-class in Lucene 5.4?

I always use filter when i need to add more than 1024 ( for no scoring cases ). If filter is removed in lucene 6, what will happen to maxbooleanclauses limit? Am i missing anything? - Kumaran R On Jan 12, 2017 5:01 AM, "Trejkaz" wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 4:25 AM, Adrien Gr

Re: Heavy usage of final in Lucene classes

Hi I want to know the purpose of having final in analyzers. For eg: classicanalyzer. It will be easy to add asciifolding filter over classicanalyzer. - Kumaran R On Jan 12, 2017 5:41 AM, "Michael McCandless" wrote: I don't think it's about efficiency but rather about n

Re: Sorting, Range Query, faceting - NumericDocValuesField Vs LongField

the link mike. i will look into LongPoint in recent versions. -- Kumaran R On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Note that Erick is giving you the Solr syntax below, but if you are > using Lucene directly, that obviously d

Re: Sorting, Range Query, faceting - NumericDocValuesField Vs LongField

Thank you Adrien. "NumericDocValuesField is the one that supports sorting." Does this mean LongField/IntField just supports lexicographic order in sorting? - Kumaran R On Dec 22, 2016 11:28 PM, "Adrien Grand" wrote: Le jeu. 22 déc. 2016 à 18:50, Kumaran Ramasubrama

Sorting, Range Query, faceting - NumericDocValuesField Vs LongField

in both 1 and 2 cases? - Kumaran R

Re: how do lucene read large index files?

Thanks Mike. We are planning to move MMapDirectory in both indexing and searching.Regarding ulimit change and read during merging, i just tried to know the impact of mmapdir during indexing. - Kumaran R On Nov 30, 2016 4:18 AM, "Michael McCandless" wrote: > > It's OK

Re: how do lucene read large index files?

Thanks a lot Uwe!!! Do we get any benefit on using MMapDirectory over NIOFSDir during indexing? During merging? Is it ok to change to MMapDirectory during search alone? -- Kumaran R On Nov 24, 2016 11:27 PM, "Erick Erickson" wrote: > > Thanks Uwe! > > > > > On Th

Re: how do lucene read large index files?

opy blocks of data > between the disk or filesystem cache and our buffers residing in Java heap. > This needs to be done on every search request, over and over again. -- Kumaran R On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > see Uwe's blog: > http://blog.thetaphi.de

how do lucene read large index files?

-- Kumaran R

Re: indexing analyzed and not_analyzed values in same field

​Hi All, ​ Can anyone say, is it advisable to have index with both analyzed and not_analyzed values in one field? ​Use case: i have custom fields in my product which can be configured differently ( ANALYZED and NOT_ANALYZED ) in different modules -- Kumaran R On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12

Faceting : what are the limitations of Taxonomy (Separate index and hierarchical facets) and SortedSetDocValuesFacetField ( flat facets and no sidecar index) ?

join & elasticsearch uses aggregations ) Is there any limitations in lucene's implementation ? -- Kumaran R

Re: Indexing values of different datatype under same field

Hi Rajnish It is not advisable to index values with two data types in a field. Features like phrase query, sorting may break in those indexes. related previous discussion : http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/289159?do=post_view_flat#289159 - Kumaran R On Fri, Nov 4

indexing analyzed and not_analyzed values in same field

,omitNorms,indexOptions=DOCS_ONLY] -- Kumaran R

Re: How to add ASCIIFoldingFilter in ClassicAnalyzer

Hi Adrien Thanks a lot for the pointer. -- Kumaran R On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Adrien Grand wrote: > You would need to override the wrapComponents method in order to wrap the > tokenstream. See for instance Lucene's LimitTokenCountAnalyzer. > > Le mar. 18 oct. 2016

Re: How to add ASCIIFoldingFilter in ClassicAnalyzer

Hi Adrien How to do this? Any Pointers? ​ > If it is fine to add the ascii folding filter at the end of the analysis chain, then you could use AnalyzerWrapper. ​ > ​- Kumaran R​ On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Kumaran Ramasubramanian wrote: > > > @Ahmet, Uwe: T

Re: How to add ASCIIFoldingFilter in ClassicAnalyzer

etaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > -Original Message- > > From: Adrien Grand [mailto:jpou...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 4:37 PM > > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: How to add ASCIIFoldingFilter in ClassicAnalyzer > > >

How to add ASCIIFoldingFilter in ClassicAnalyzer

? public final class ClassicAnalyzer extends StopwordAnalyzerBase > -- Kumaran R

Re: Clarification on LUCENE 4795 discussions ( Add FacetsCollector based on SortedSetDocValues )

Thank you shai. Will check them and let you know for clarifications. - Kumaran R On Sep 27, 2016 10:05 AM, "Shai Erera" wrote: > > Hey, > > Here's a blog I wrote a couple years ago about using facet associations: > http://shaierera.blogspot.com/2013/01/facet-asso

Re: Clarification on LUCENE 4795 discussions ( Add FacetsCollector based on SortedSetDocValues )

ation using SortedSetDocValues and got it simply by changing the query and opening the IndexReader for each level of query using SortedSetDocValuesReaderState. " Is it possible easily? - Kumaran R On Sep 27, 2016 9:38 AM, "Michael McCandless" wrote: > > Weighted facets is

Clarification on LUCENE 4795 discussions ( Add FacetsCollector based on SortedSetDocValues )

er features, but its a nice option. I > personally don't think its the end of the world if Mike's patch doesnt > support all the features of the faceting module initially or even ever. what ​ ​is meant by weighted facets ​? what are ​ othe ​r facets​ features ? ​-- Kumaran R ​

Re: parent-child relationship in lucene - to avoid reindexing if parent information changes

). Because, i want to make all existing messages in a group as visible to any new member... so i need to reindex all messages with that newly added member id.. Is index time join (for second case ) or query time join ( for first case ) can be best fit? -- Kumaran R On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 1:55 PM

parent-child relationship in lucene - to avoid reindexing if parent information changes

to delete a member id or edit a group name without reindexing of its children?? is it possible to avoid reindexing? Which lucene class is best fit for this? Related Article: http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2012/01/searching-relational-content-with.html -- Kumaran R

In lucene faceting, advantages of taxonomy index over ​SortedSetDocValuesFacetField

functionality we will miss because of this? other than faster faceting...Is there any benefit of using taxonomy index over docvalues field for faceting? -- Kumaran R

Re: How to store and retrieve latest utf8mb4 emoji / smiley characters in lucene index

find😃f😄g😅h​ Any further pointers on the same ?? -- Kumaran R On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:07 AM, Kumaran Ramasubramanian wrote: > > Hi All, > > Is there any pointers on storing smileys in lucene index?? Any help is much appreciated. > > Thank you. > > -- >

Re: How to store and retrieve latest utf8mb4 emoji / smiley characters in lucene index

Hi All, Is there any pointers on storing smileys in lucene index?? Any help is much appreciated. Thank you. -- Kumaran R On Jul 30, 2016 12:24 PM, "Kumaran Ramasubramanian" wrote: > > Hi All, > > Am using lucene 4.10.4. Using lucene index, Is there any way to store and

How to store and retrieve latest utf8mb4 emoji / smiley characters in lucene index

Hi All, Am using lucene 4.10.4. Using lucene index, Is there any way to store and retrieve latest utf8 and utf8mb4 emoji / smiley characters?? In any latest lucene version?? Thanks in advance. -- Kumaran R

Re: Indexing and storing Long fields

Ok mike.. thanks for the explanation... i have another doubt... i read in some article like, we can have one storedfield & docvalue field with same field... is it so? -- Kumaran R On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > O

Re: Indexing and storing Long fields

Hi Mike, For your information, am using lucene 4.10.4.. am i missing anything? ​-- Kumaran R​ On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Kumaran Ramasubramanian wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > 1.if we index one field as analyzed and not analyzed using same name, > phrase queries are not

Re: Indexing and storing Long fields

t; Expect many more anomalies. At best you need to > index both forms as text rather than mixing numeric > and text data. Thanks in advance... -- Kumaran R On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 1:54 AM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 4:48

Re: Indexing and storing Long fields

Hi Mike, *Two different fields can be the same name* Is it so? You mean we can index one field as docvaluefield and also stored field, Using same name? And AFAIK, We cannot index one field as analyzed and not analyzed using the same name. Am i right? Kumaran R On Jul 21, 2016 11:50 PM

query norm understanding when we use term boosting during search time

inconsistency expected ? Any pointers is much appreciated... Thank you :-) -- Kumaran R

Re: Lucene term modifiers during search time - importance based on listed order

Dear All, Is there pointers on how to take my first step regarding below mentioned requirement? Any help is much appreciated. Thanks. ​when i dont not get matched records for a query, i want to try term > modifiers ( as per order ) to retrieve related results ( at least )​ > > --

Lucene term modifiers during search time - importance based on listed order

:-) -- *​*​ Kumaran R

Re: Difference in Retrieving values of a docvalue field using atomicreader over duplicate StoredField

Thanks a lot for the clarification mike :-) -- *​*​ Kumaran R On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:38 AM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Well, each access may involve disk seeks (if the pages are not already hot > in the OS's IO cache). > > So if you do

Difference in Retrieving values of a docvalue field using atomicreader over duplicate StoredField

performance or time taken issue in retrieving values of a docvalue field using atomicreader over StoredField? ​ Please clarify me what am i missing?​ Thanks in advance ​--​ Kumaran R

IntField is not indexing properly - field properties changed to "just stored"

s before adding to index​* stored ​Thanks in advance​ :-) -- ​ ​ Kumaran R

Re: Need change one field type from IntField to String including indexOptions to store positions & Norms

yes. All fields are stored in index. so sounds like working. Thanks a lot jack :-) Nice to meet you here :-) -- ​ Kumaran R​ On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote: > You could certainly read your stored values from your current index and > then write new documents to

Re: Need change one field type from IntField to String including indexOptions to store positions & Norms

Hi Jack Krupansky Thanks for the reply. That will work fine. But i am trying to use the stored values instead of hitting database for reindex. Isn't it better way to reindex? Any inputs? -- ​Kumaran R On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote: > Delete the full i

Re: Need change one field type from IntField to String including indexOptions to store positions & Norms

need to reindex all of your data. > > -- Jack Krupansky > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Kumaran Ramasubramanian > wrote: > >> Dear All >> >> i am using lucene 4.10.4. Is there any more information i missed to >> provide? Please let me know. >> >&

Re: Need change one field type from IntField to String including indexOptions to store positions & Norms

Dear All i am using lucene 4.10.4. Is there any more information i missed to provide? Please let me know. -- Kumaran R*​* On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Kumaran Ramasubramanian < kums@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > Previous Post - > http://www.gossamer-thr

Need change one field type from IntField to String including indexOptions to store positions & Norms

Hi All, Previous Post - http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/289159 i have indexed one field "STATUS" as both IntField & String field in same index. Now i want to take IntField containing documents and change the value of field "STATUS" to string with norms & positions ( t

Re: Using ​phrase query in Termfilters

Hi Uwe Thanks for the clarification. ​--​ ​Kumaran R​ On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi, > > To use a real phrase (more than one term) as part of a filter, you have to > convert the PhraseQuery to a Filter: new QueryWrapperFilter(phrasequery). > The

Using ​phrase query in Termfilters

Hi All, Am using lucene 4.10.4. Is it right to add analyzed multi valued fields & phrase query for the same field in boolean filter. i believe we could not apply analyzers to values in filters. So am not getting results for those filters' match. String phraseTerm = "hello world" > Term term =

Re: Two different types of values in same field name in single index

data. Since you're not sorting you should be > OK with the caveat that searching for > "02" won't match an indexed value of "2" unless you > remove all leading zeros at both index and query > time. > > Best, > Erick > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at

Re: Two different types of values in same field name in single index

Yes Will, You are right. But i dont use "status" field for sorting. i have other fields that is being used for sorting specifically. And so i dont face any issues in sorting as of now. -- ​Kumaran R​ On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:20 PM, will wrote: > Kumaran - > > Are

Two different types of values in same field name in single index

it is supported to have both Field & LongField with same field name in same index. And also Please suggest me any articles discussing this kind of problem. Thanks :-) Related links: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/109530 -- *​*​ Kumaran R

Re: How does Lucene decides which fields have termvectors stored and which not?

Hi Sachin i want to look into ur indexing code. please share it - Kumaran R On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Sachin Kulkarni wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for all the code, It got sent out accidentally. > > The following code is part of the Benchmark utility in Lucen

Re: How does Lucene decides which fields have termvectors stored and which not?

Hi Sachin Kulkarni, If possible, Please share your code. - Kumaran R On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Sachin Kulkarni wrote: > Hi, > > I am using Lucene 4.6.0. > > I have been storing 5 fields for my documents in the index, namely body, > title, docname, docdate

Re: Is housekeeping of Lucene indexes block index update but allow search ?

Hi Gaurav Thanks for the clarification. If possible, please share your NRT manager API related code example. i believe, it will help me to understand little better. - Kumaran R On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Gaurav gupta wrote: > Thanks Kumaran and Erik for resolving my quer

Re: Is housekeeping of Lucene indexes block index update but allow search ?

on this ) 2. Merge will be taken care by default values( merge factor 2) of lucene. If u need to control more on merge policy, please go through about merge by size or by number of segments or many merge policies. Hope this will help you a little bit. -- Kumaran R Sent from Phone > On 04-

Re: How does Lucene decide which fields to index?

You should know two things to get this. 1.Indexed fields can be searched. 2.Stored fields can be fetched. Check your code whether you are storing all fields. -- Kumaran R Sent from Phone > On 04-Aug-2014, at 7:13 pm, Sachin Kulkarni wrote: > > Hi, > > I am using lucene 4

Is it right to index multi-valued fields with hash value?

limitations and drawbacks in using hash values in lucene index. - Kumaran R

Re: Doubt Regarding Lucene matchscore

Provide some more information like lucene version, sample code, parameters involved in indexing and searching. -- Kumaran R > On 18-Jul-2014, at 6:52 pm, Priyanka Tufchi > wrote: > > Hi All > > I am matching and ranking two set of Docs using apache lucene and I passes > p

Re: problem in using distanceFilter in booleanFilter (using FilterClause)

Hi David Thanks for your response. Actually i dont know where to post. Thats why. i will make sure sending to one list in future. could you please direct me on my question? - Kumaran > You'll be lucky to get help with the spatial module from Lucene 3.x, which > is what you are

problem in using distanceFilter in booleanFilter (using FilterClause)

pache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.searchWithFilter(IndexSearcher.java:258) > at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:218) at > org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:199) at > org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:177) at > org.apache.lucene.search.Searcher.search(Searcher.java:49) at > com.zoho.training.RadialSearch.search(RadialSearch.java:246) at > com.zoho.training.RadialSearch.main(RadialSearch.java:281) Kumaran R

what is the difference between usages of ChainedFilter and FilterClause in lucene?

Am using lucene 3.0.3. i have two filters (BooleanFilter and DistanceFilter).what is the best way to do logical operations between these two filters? BooleanFilter: ( OR,AND filters using FilterClause ) BooleanFilter boolFilter = new BooleanFilter(); Term term = new Term("city", "texas");

sortfield does not has any effect when using with FieldComparator- Why?

stackoverflow.com/questions/22929423/how-lucene-handles-sortfield-with-comparator-if-sortfield-is Kumaran R

Re: problem in using distanceFilter in booleanFilter (using FilterClause)

pache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.searchWithFilter(IndexSearcher.java:258) > at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:218) at > org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:199) at > org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:177) at > org.apache.lucene.search.Searcher.search(Searcher.java:49) at > com.zoho.training.RadialSearch.search(RadialSearch.java:246) at > com.zoho.training.RadialSearch.main(RadialSearch.java:281) Kumaran R

How to get unique values for field1 where search is on field2?

Hi, I've indexed Book Title,Author Name,Contents and some other fields. Previously I gave option to search string in any of those fields and I displayed results from getting fields "Title","Author Name","Contents" from hits resulted docs. Now I want to display "Title" & "Author Name" list w

Does Lucene search over memory too?

Hi, Does Lucene search FSDirectory as well as buffered in-memory docs while we are calling searcher.search(query)? Why I'm asking this is, I've indexed my doc with mergeFactor & Max.Buff.Docs = 50 and I've optimized and closed it at mid-night only.Beforeoptimization, my search gives partial

Re: how to get approximate total matching

all your indexes? That would help folks give you better responses and perhaps suggest other ways of solving your problem. Erick On 3/14/07, senthil kumaran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi. > I have more index directories (>6) all in GB,and searching my query > with >

how to get approximate total matching

Hi. I have more index directories (>6) all in GB,and searching my query with single IndexSearcher to all indexes one after another.i.e. I create one IndexSearcher for index1 and search over that.Finally I close that and create new IndexSearcher for index2 and so on. If i get 200 total results

Indexing & search?

Hi, I've indexed 4 among 5 fields with Field.Store.YES & Field.Index.NO. And indexed the remaining one, say it's Field Name is *content*, with Field.Store.YES & Field.Index.Tokenized(It's value is collective value of other 4 fields and some more values).So my search always based on *content*fie