t; why is that important? We have several other servers -- whose only
> > difference is a smaller data set -- with dozens of concurrent users, and
> the
> > index on those servers gets modified and read concurrently all the time,
> but
> > none of these other servers have e
a smaller data set -- with dozens of concurrent users, and the
> index on those servers gets modified and read concurrently all the time, but
> none of these other servers have ever exhibited this bug.
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: Leonid M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
dified and read concurrently all the time, but
> none of these other servers have ever exhibited this bug.
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: Leonid M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2008 5:35:47 PM
> Subje
m: Leonid M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2008 5:35:47 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with lucene search starting to return 0 hits when a few
seconds earlier it was returning hundreds
* And what's about visibility filter? * Are you sure no o
* And what's about visibility filter? * Are you sure no one else accesses
IndexReader and modifies index? See reader.maxDocs() to be confident.
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Justin Grunau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have some code that uses lucene which has been working perfectly well
> fo
Yes, surely the analyzer used at indexing time governs what's in the index
and thus what can be searched. I'd surmise that your index doesn't contain
any tokens with < or > if StandardAnalyzer was used, so no matter what
analyzer you use at query time, you won't be able to find tokens that aren't
Thanks for your reply.
I am working with an index which is created separately. It is created with a
StandardTokenizer.
I have read there should be used the same tokenizer which the index was
created with.
Anyway, I have tried other tokenizers while consulting, such as the
WhitespaceTokenizer, but
Sure, your problem is probably that the query goes through an analyzer and
its associated tokenizer. Probably something like StandardAnalyzer which
"massages" the input and strips out most non-alphabetic characters,
except some. It tries to be smart about URLs, e-mail addresses, etc.
If you'r
On Mittwoch 03 Mai 2006 21:59, Rodrigo Marcuschi wrote:
> I am having problems using lucene 1.9.1. I was using 1.4.3 successfully,
Mhh, IndexModifier isn't part of Lucene 1.4, did you add it manually?
> documents I add, all I get is '1 docs in index'. If I DON'T close the
> modifier,
It must be
I have corrected the incorrect hyperlink issues. Sorry 'bout that.
Erik
On Mar 3, 2005, at 2:22 PM, Antonio Chillarón Barahona wrote:
Hello,
I am sorry if this is not the proper forum for this question.
Recently, I have tried to download Snowball from Lucene's Sandbox but
the link on "Mor
10 matches
Mail list logo
