Hiya,
Thanks Peder, I like this excerpt:
Premium Security: Encrypted traffic within 2547 VPNs
Some users have extremely high security requirements and require IPSec
encryption of traffic within a Layer 3 2547 VPN. In
this case, the ES PIC receives inbound traffic in the clear (or
IPSec-encr
Hi.
Take a look at this.
http://www.juniper.net/products/modules/100089.pdf
-Peder
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Leigh Porter
Sendt: 5. januar 2007 12:52
Til: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Emne: [j-nsp] Encrypted LSP
Hiya,
Does
Hello
We have strange problem with policer on etherchannel interface
There is configuration
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ...cal-routers tpnet interfaces ae1 unit 514
description "xxx [cat5-d13:Gi2/0/1] xxx";
vlan-id 514;
family inet {
policer {
input 175m;
output 350m;
}
addre
Hiya,
Does anybody know if you can encrypt traffic on a LSP?
i.e. have encrypted LSPs ?
Thanks,
Leigh Porter
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
How are you applying the policy? It should be applied to the
forwarding-table like this:
routing-options {
forwarding-table {
export TEST_POLICY;
}
}
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman
Dear colleagues,
after Upgrading to JunOS 7.4R4.3 i get the following messages:
Jan 5 11:46:40 cr0.vie.at mgd[7875]: UI_WRITE_LOSTCONN: Lost
connection to peer ''
Jan 5 12:01:39 cr0.vie.at mgd[8056]: UI_WRITE_LOSTCONN: Lost
connection to peer ''
All BGP Sessions on the Machine are up for a l
Hi,
Does anyone know how to separate vpn traffic on LSP. Supposed I have 2 LSPs and
2 VPNs and I want each VPN uses different LSP. I have a method that using
policy matching by vpn-target community and using target:*:* for last matching
condition but it seems that there is a bug on JUNOS which
7 matches
Mail list logo