Re: [j-nsp] Encrypted LSP

2007-01-05 Thread Leigh Porter
Hiya, Thanks Peder, I like this excerpt: Premium Security: Encrypted traffic within 2547 VPNs Some users have extremely high security requirements and require IPSec encryption of traffic within a Layer 3 2547 VPN. In this case, the ES PIC receives inbound traffic in the clear (or IPSec-encr

Re: [j-nsp] Encrypted LSP

2007-01-05 Thread Peder Christian Bach
Hi. Take a look at this. http://www.juniper.net/products/modules/100089.pdf -Peder -Opprinnelig melding- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Leigh Porter Sendt: 5. januar 2007 12:52 Til: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Emne: [j-nsp] Encrypted LSP Hiya, Does

[j-nsp] problem with policer

2007-01-05 Thread Lukasz Trabinski
Hello We have strange problem with policer on etherchannel interface There is configuration [EMAIL PROTECTED]> ...cal-routers tpnet interfaces ae1 unit 514 description "xxx [cat5-d13:Gi2/0/1] xxx"; vlan-id 514; family inet { policer { input 175m; output 350m; } addre

[j-nsp] Encrypted LSP

2007-01-05 Thread Leigh Porter
Hiya, Does anybody know if you can encrypt traffic on a LSP? i.e. have encrypted LSPs ? Thanks, Leigh Porter ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Separating LSP for routing instance

2007-01-05 Thread Dan Evans
How are you applying the policy? It should be applied to the forwarding-table like this: routing-options { forwarding-table { export TEST_POLICY; } } ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman

[j-nsp] Lost connection to peer ''

2007-01-05 Thread Joerg Staedele / Trusted Network GmbH
Dear colleagues, after Upgrading to JunOS 7.4R4.3 i get the following messages: Jan 5 11:46:40 cr0.vie.at mgd[7875]: UI_WRITE_LOSTCONN: Lost connection to peer '' Jan 5 12:01:39 cr0.vie.at mgd[8056]: UI_WRITE_LOSTCONN: Lost connection to peer '' All BGP Sessions on the Machine are up for a l

[j-nsp] Separating LSP for routing instance

2007-01-05 Thread Benny Sumitro
Hi, Does anyone know how to separate vpn traffic on LSP. Supposed I have 2 LSPs and 2 VPNs and I want each VPN uses different LSP. I have a method that using policy matching by vpn-target community and using target:*:* for last matching condition but it seems that there is a bug on JUNOS which