-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pekka Savola wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>> Kevin,
>>>
>>> Slide 20 of the presentation states that RH processing can not be
>>> deavtivat> ed on Juniper routers. Not sure whether that applies to
>>> JunOS, JunosE or bo> th.
>
> Sinan, have you tried enabling bfd for the igp session that is in turn
> supporting the rsvp session? I've not tested personally but have
> indications from developers that bfd will inform the igp of the link
> down, and this will in turn cause the igp to start updating the TED,
> which in turn
Hey all,
I have a working config running on a Cisco 7206 I've inherited.
It looks like a TCC between an ATM DS3 PVC and a fast-E VLAN:
interface ATM1/0
no ip address
atm scrambling cell-payload
atm framing cbitplcp
no atm ilmi-keepalive
no atm enable-ilmi-trap
pvc 1/100 l2transport
u
Sinan, have you tried enabling bfd for the igp session that is in turn
supporting the rsvp session? I've not tested personally but have
indications from developers that bfd will inform the igp of the link
down, and this will in turn cause the igp to start updating the TED,
which in turn triggers c
Hi,
Ive seen this a couple of times lately and I cant seem to find any related
doc's as to explain what this issue is.
Would be grateful if someone could enlighten me as to what this represents.
The error is:
Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] cfeb at Apr 25 14:35:13 ...
ibis-gw-2 cfeb SGE(1/0): r
Hi dear all, I found something wrong with OSPF neighbor establishment.
OSPF network type is p2mp.
After make neighbore down and then recover the link, never established to Full
state.
the remote M10i is always "init" state.
so I tried issue the "restart routing" command, then established OSPF nei
Hi dear all, I found something wrong with OSPF neighbor establishment.
OSPF network type is p2mp.
After make neighbore down and then recover the link, never established to Full
state.
the remote M10i is always "init" state.
so I tried issue the "restart routing" command, then established OSPF nei
Sail,
The Tunnel is only for be informed when the triggered interface is failing or
not.
When the interface is ok the tunnel will be up and when it fails the tunnel is
down.
Is a bit tricky ;) I'll try to explain it.
Suposse you want to check the ge between router A and B:
RouterA --
Dear all,
I've tried BFD with LSPs but I wasn't able to make it work.
If you've the possibility to use a Tunnel PIC - with a ficticious interface
(f.e. with private address)
and static routes (via the end-point of the interface you want to trigger) with
BFD - is a good option,
it works for me
People,
Thanks a lot for your answer, but in our case, we are not in a MPLS/VPN
environment.
The juniper M10i router is in a border location in our network and it
establishes network peering along with 5 different telecom operator
companies.
Because we are a cable TV operator, our clients and
Hi Sinan,
Current version of JunOS that you are using, logs an error message when LSP
goes down because of BFD as mentioned in page-191 of the following doc. However
it doesn't make the LSP down.
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos81/swconfig81-mpls-apps/download/swconfig81-mpl
agree with alex & paulo, allowing propagate and decriment ttl allows your users
to see hops in the network and in MPLS LSP deployment why allow them to shoot
you with bullets of your own making. IMHO Best common practice no-propagate/
detriment TTL
BTW found this is a useful guide
http://check
Hi all,
We are trying to achieve fast convergence times for one of our links. We can
not detect link failures in this link directly, i.e. interface never goes down
in case of failures. We decided that we can benefit from BFD for LSPs. We are
testing this configuration;
label-switched-path ls
13 matches
Mail list logo
