[j-nsp] E-Series MPLS Interoperability with Cisco 12k

Dear list, looking at the Ethernet Forum and devices using standards to "talk" MPLS, I am missing Cisco there. They probably have a reason to do so but that is also the catch: does the E-Series MPLS implementation work with the one Cisco uses for their 12000 series? Any insights appreciated. Be

Re: [j-nsp] BGP/MPLS VPNs (Jonathan Brashear)

Hi Jonathan, We have been doing 2547-bis VPNs for several years now. They are now called RFC 4364 VPNs They work very well and are a lot of fun. We currently have about 80 Juniper nodes, mix of M40e & ERX, with about 1200 VPNs. In the network we manage ALL traffic is in VPNs there is nothing,

Re: [j-nsp] Adding static IPv6 neighbor entries

Updating. The request for functionality was in 5.1, feature first released in 8.3. Sorry about that. The machine I tested on was 8.5. Regards > -Original Message- > From: Harry Reynolds > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 12:58 PM > To: Aaron Daubman; juniper-nsp > Subject: RE: [j-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Adding static IPv6 neighbor entries

Looks like this was added back in 5.1, but until you asked I did not realize. The record shows it was not tested, but the syntax is not hidden; Not sure on docs. Syntax is similar to a static arp, done under the interface's IPv6 address. HTHs [edit interfaces ge-3/1/1 unit 0 family inet6] [EMAIL

Re: [j-nsp] T1 master/slave timing

On IQ cards such as the COC12, clocking can be set individually for OCx DSx, and T1 interfaces. On non-IQ, clocking is set at the parent level and while it can be set at the child level, it has no effect. That's my understanding, anyway: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos84/fea

[j-nsp] T1 master/slave timing

Hi All, I want to have master/slave timing in the Juniper router. The external clocking source is the master. The card is a channelized OC-3. Can that be done by setting clocking to external at the OC-3 level and internal at the T1 level? Does this institue a master/slave timing, or will the

[j-nsp] Adding static IPv6 neighbor entries

Greetings, I'm looking to specify some static IPv6 neighbors on a Juniper router running JUNOS 8.1R3.3. I've found documentation specifying how to do this on Juniper's E-series routers running JUNOSe: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/erx/junose81/swconfig-ip-ipv6-igp/html/ipv6-config19.ht

Re: [j-nsp] BGP/MPLS VPNs

Why do not look into JUNOS manual? http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos84/swconfig84-vpns/id-11140299.html#id-11140299 2007/8/29, Ed Ronayne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi All, > > There seems to be a wealth of information available on > implementing > this on some other pla

Re: [j-nsp] BGP/MPLS VPNs

Hi All, There seems to be a wealth of information available on implementing this on some other platforms. I wonder if someone could point me in the direction of some example configs for junos. Regards Ed -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Be

Re: [j-nsp] BGP/MPLS VPNs

Paolo, I not understand "I would advise you to stick more towards the standards (ie ldp instead of rsvp)". L3VPN do not consider signaling used for translort LSP. It can be anything LDP, RSVP. There is even standard using GRE for transport tunnel. For signaling vpn labels, by definition MP-BGP is

Re: [j-nsp] BGP/MPLS VPNs

? l3vpns is a very proven technology, very easy to setup and I would advise you to stick more towards the standards (ie ldp instead of rsvp) for the mpls signaling protocol. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jonathan Brashear Sent: Wed 8/29/2007 11:15 AM To:

[j-nsp] BGP/MPLS VPNs

http://www.juniper.net/solutions/literature/white_papers/200012.pdf I've been reading up on this solution and it seems very plausible & scalable, but we haven't tried to set it up in our lab yet. Has anyone deployed this service, and if so what's your feedback on it? Network Engineer, Managed Se