Hi,
Our company is going to deploy ME network for providing broadband
services for residential customers. JNPR proposes the design with few
MX480 used as a core and E120 as a BRASes. This model looks like a
BRAS centric, because all customer ME rings will be connected to E120
and all traffic (
Thanks for your input Alain much appreciated.
Mario.
Email disclaimer:
The information contained in or attached to this communication may contain
confidential or privileged information and is intended for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient of this email communicatio
If it is for a lab, throw a switch on a real Ethernet port and create
a bunch of VLANs
On Nov 20, 2007, at 10:04 AM, Bit Gossip wrote:
> I certainly will not do it on a production router, but I kind of
> need an
> hack for that for my lab.
> Thanks,
> Bit.
>
>
> On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 15:36,
Beny,
Try upgrading with a domestic jinstall image. If you
haven't already, you should probably backup the config
before hand.
Jared
--- Beny Dwi Setyawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Does anyone have experienced when tried to install
> jcrypto?
>
> I got this error log on m
Mario
Another update to one of your questions
the Key number 1 on the cisco side is purely local as explained in cisco
documentations:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/11_3/np1/configuration/guide/1cindep.html#wp5061
"Each key has its own key identifier (specified with the *key* /number/
com
Hi Mario
Here is a sample configuration tested on fxp0 on version 7.1R3.3 of
Junos facing a cisco 1721 in version 12.2(7r)XM1.
Here is the sampled config from the Juniper side:
protocols {
rip {
traceoptions {
file RIP_Trace;
flag auth;
flag packe
Hi All,
Does anyone have experienced when tried to install jcrypto?
I got this error log on my router then I can't telnet the router anymore.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> request system software add jcrypto-8.0R3.4.tgz
Installing package '/var/home/datacomm/jcrypto-8.0R3.4.tgz' ...
Available spa
I certainly will not do it on a production router, but I kind of need an
hack for that for my lab.
Thanks,
Bit.
On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 15:36, Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
> Bit Gossip wrote:
> > I notice that a Juniper router doesn't forward packets between fxp0 and
> > all other interfaces, even if a
I see. Thanks. BTW, did you max out at 2GB or have you tried going beyong?
Cheers,
- Original Message
From: Jonathan Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Lawrence Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 3:25:53 PM
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Enquiry
Bit Gossip wrote:
> I notice that a Juniper router doesn't forward packets between fxp0 and
> all other interfaces, even if a route exists. Is there a way to change
> this behaviour?
>
Hi,
The documentation clearly states that forwarding will not be done on
fxp0 and that is only intended for m
I notice that a Juniper router doesn't forward packets between fxp0 and
all other interfaces, even if a route exists. Is there a way to change
this behaviour?
Thanks,
Luca.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
hi，
There is multicast configuration on our E320.
It is planned to control PPPoE subscribers' ability
of multicast by radius. Current, IGMP-Enable could be
controlled by radius authentication. But, we did not
find any VSA attribute on fast leaving.
is it possible to control "igmp fast leavi
BTW, just wondering, has anyone tried going beyond the 2GB "limit" for the
J4350 series? Any experiences to share?
TIA!
- Original Message
From: Jared Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Eugeniu Patrascu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Lawrence Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Se
13 matches
Mail list logo
