Re: [j-nsp] ifIndex Interface Persistence

2008-04-10 Thread Pekka Savola
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Eric Van Tol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> This is enabled by default. All SNMP ifindexes are contained within a >> file called /var/db/dcd.snmp_ix. These do not change through reboots >> unless you replace an RE or something happens to t

Re: [j-nsp] ifIndex Interface Persistence

2008-04-10 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Eric Van Tol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > This is enabled by default. All SNMP ifindexes are contained within a > file called /var/db/dcd.snmp_ix. These do not change through reboots > unless you replace an RE or something happens to the file system to > wipe out this file. Is t

[j-nsp] NAT configuration restrictions....

2008-04-10 Thread Wink
In the AJRE student guide on page 6-21, it says that sessions are tracked in one of two ways: 1. Per-service-set (interface-style service-sets) 2. Per-interface (next-hop-style service-sets) Then in the Services Interfaces Configuration Guide (in the technical documentation section Juniper's we

Re: [j-nsp] bgp_nexthop_sanity messages on my M20

2008-04-10 Thread Stefan Fouant
Your router is in urgent need of psychiatric assistance. ;) In all seriousness, it means it's ignoring the routes because they are failing the sanity checks... have you performed traceoptions on the sender and the receiver to determine what the next hop is on each? Stefan Fouant On Thu, Apr 10,

[j-nsp] bgp_nexthop_sanity messages on my M20

2008-04-10 Thread Dave D
Hello all, So I have 2 Juniper M20 Routers running Junos 7.6R4.3 Last night I started to get this message in my logs Apr 10 15:44:59 juniper2 rpd[94308]: bgp_nexthop_sanity: peer X.X.X.X (Internal AS (AS# ) next hop (L) local, ignoring routes in this update And I keep seeing this message

Re: [j-nsp] ifIndex Interface Persistence

2008-04-10 Thread Eric Van Tol
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:juniper-nsp- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stefan Fouant > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 11:38 AM > To: Juniper-Nsp > Subject: [j-nsp] ifIndex Interface Persistence > > Hi folks, > > Does Juniper have a knob similar to Cisco which c

Re: [j-nsp] ifIndex Interface Persistence

2008-04-10 Thread Erdem Sener
Hi Stefan, The SNMP indexes in JUNOS are consistent between reboots by default. Thanks, Erdem On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Stefan Fouant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > Does Juniper have a knob similar to Cisco which can enable ifIndex > interface persistence, or is this enab

Re: [j-nsp] ifIndex Interface Persistence

2008-04-10 Thread Pekka Savola
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Stefan Fouant wrote: > Does Juniper have a knob similar to Cisco which can enable ifIndex > interface persistence, or is this enabled by default? I've looked > through the JUNOS documentation and can't find anything... As far as I know, ifindexes automatically persist across

[j-nsp] ifIndex Interface Persistence

2008-04-10 Thread Stefan Fouant
Hi folks, Does Juniper have a knob similar to Cisco which can enable ifIndex interface persistence, or is this enabled by default? I've looked through the JUNOS documentation and can't find anything... Stefan Fouant ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper

[j-nsp] (no subject)

2008-04-10 Thread M.Mihailidis
Hello I have a 5gt ADSL and the thing I want to do is: I want to configure a second pppoe on Ethernet with the other modem working as bridged. I configured a new VR and created untrust.1 to zone test untrust which was the pppoe which worked (it was connected) And another interface trust.1 a

Re: [j-nsp] Class of Service help on T-series w/8.2R1.7

2008-04-10 Thread samuel.gay
Hi ! It seems that we have the same kind of problem. We are seing this issue on M10i/M7i routers and 4 ports GE IQ2, with all JUNOS version. In fact the problem come from the CFEB. For the moment we have seen it with 3 CFEBs. The requirement for reproduction is that the input interface for the