Thank u all, guys.
Regards,
runt
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 4:56 AM, David Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Runt. I'd echo what Erdem mentioned, and wanted to let you know
> that we're running both RSVP & LDP in our T-series network without any
> problems.
>
> David
>
>
> 2008/5/17 Erdem Sene
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RTFM
http://www.quotegarden.com/procrastination.html
apologies, a support contract & a pinch of salt might do the trick.
- Original Message -
From: "Travers Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 12:36 AM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Which Ro
So does a j2320 have slot for 2 Gb of ram?
Wonder how much it will cost to replace the ram?
TS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka
Sent: Saturday, 17 May 2008 1:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: R
We use private IP space in the main routing instance for configuring
backbone link PtP IPs, BGP sessions and LSP endpoints, and then put
all other services into their own routing instances. For example, all
internet customers are in the same VRF routing instance, while each
other type of custome
Hi Runt. I'd echo what Erdem mentioned, and wanted to let you know
that we're running both RSVP & LDP in our T-series network without any
problems.
David
2008/5/17 Erdem Sener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Runt,
>
> There shouldn't be any problems for both RSVP+LDP running
> simultaneously. That
Hi Runt,
There shouldn't be any problems for both RSVP+LDP running
simultaneously. That said ,I'd suggest to rather
leave the ldp metric alone until you've done configuring LDP on all
the routers, since even with your LDP up
RSVP will have preference over the next-hops anyways.
Once you have yo
People,
We have a Juniper Router ... J-2350 with 1GB DRAM and 1GB CF.
It is running JUNOS 9.1R1.8.
The J-Web interface is SO SLOW to open and to manage the equipment.
Does anyone has similar problems with J-WEB ?
I have tried: firefox and Internet Explorer 7.
Using FIREFOX ... the J-WEB does
I have a couple of M-series routers that were for valid-at-the-time
reasons rolled out with the master routing instance being on a
non-public (i.e. real IP's, but not connected to the Internet)
network. They currently serve about 20 private customers, with
varying degrees of policy complexity.
A
Sounds like you've got most of it set up. If your tunnel interface is
bound to the Trust zone and you haven't enabled the blocking of
Intra-Zone traffic 'Network > Zones > Edit Trust Zone', then you don't
need policy. If that's the case then it's most likely a routing
issue... can you display the
'get interface' from the CLI or 'Network > Interfaces' from the WebUI.
Stefan Fouant
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:16 PM, sunnyday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And another question how can I tell to which zone the tunnel interface is
> bound?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Fouant [mai
And another question how can I tell to which zone the tunnel interface is
bound?
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Fouant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 6:58 PM
To: sunnyday
Cc: Juniper-Nsp; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Netscreen vpn
There is just not enou
I have only the default virtual routers the untrust zone is in trust vr
I have configured the vpn and a bidirectional policy:
from untrust to trust
source dialup vpn destination any
action tunnel
what do I need to configure next to have access to the local network?
-Original Message-
There is just not enough information supplied to determine the
problem. Is the tunnel interface bound to the Trust zone, or the
Untrust zone? If it's bound to the Trust zone and you haven't
explicity blocked intrazone traffic then you don't need a policy. Are
you using any other Virtual-Routers
Hello I have configured a dialup vpn and successfully created the tunnel and
received ip address but I cannot manage to ping the netscreen`s
Trust interface. The ip address the vpn has is 10.250.250.1 and the trust
interface is 192.168.10.1. I tried with static routes and policies
With no r
Hi,
Dose anyone here have experience in changing rsvp to ldp?
I've got a problem here.
It's about a mpls-based network, about 50 P routers(M20 & M320) and 20 PE
routers(M10i).
The label distributing protocol is now the RSVP. LSP are created mannually.
TE is not enabled.
We want to change rsvp to l
15 matches
Mail list logo