Re: [j-nsp] RSVP to LDP

2008-05-17 Thread Plz
Thank u all, guys. Regards, runt On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 4:56 AM, David Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Runt. I'd echo what Erdem mentioned, and wanted to let you know > that we're running both RSVP & LDP in our T-series network without any > problems. > > David > > > 2008/5/17 Erdem Sene

Re: [j-nsp] Which Router

2008-05-17 Thread Evan Williams
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RTFM http://www.quotegarden.com/procrastination.html apologies, a support contract & a pinch of salt might do the trick. - Original Message - From: "Travers Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 12:36 AM Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Which Ro

Re: [j-nsp] Which Router

2008-05-17 Thread Travers Stark
So does a j2320 have slot for 2 Gb of ram? Wonder how much it will cost to replace the ram? TS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: Saturday, 17 May 2008 1:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: R

Re: [j-nsp] Logical router to master router

2008-05-17 Thread David Ball
We use private IP space in the main routing instance for configuring backbone link PtP IPs, BGP sessions and LSP endpoints, and then put all other services into their own routing instances. For example, all internet customers are in the same VRF routing instance, while each other type of custome

Re: [j-nsp] RSVP to LDP

2008-05-17 Thread David Ball
Hi Runt. I'd echo what Erdem mentioned, and wanted to let you know that we're running both RSVP & LDP in our T-series network without any problems. David 2008/5/17 Erdem Sener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Runt, > > There shouldn't be any problems for both RSVP+LDP running > simultaneously. That

Re: [j-nsp] RSVP to LDP

2008-05-17 Thread Erdem Sener
Hi Runt, There shouldn't be any problems for both RSVP+LDP running simultaneously. That said ,I'd suggest to rather leave the ldp metric alone until you've done configuring LDP on all the routers, since even with your LDP up RSVP will have preference over the next-hops anyways. Once you have yo

[j-nsp] J-WEB ... so slow

2008-05-17 Thread GIULIANO (UOL)
People, We have a Juniper Router ... J-2350 with 1GB DRAM and 1GB CF. It is running JUNOS 9.1R1.8. The J-Web interface is SO SLOW to open and to manage the equipment. Does anyone has similar problems with J-WEB ? I have tried: firefox and Internet Explorer 7. Using FIREFOX ... the J-WEB does

[j-nsp] Logical router to master router

2008-05-17 Thread nachocheeze
I have a couple of M-series routers that were for valid-at-the-time reasons rolled out with the master routing instance being on a non-public (i.e. real IP's, but not connected to the Internet) network. They currently serve about 20 private customers, with varying degrees of policy complexity. A

Re: [j-nsp] Netscreen vpn

2008-05-17 Thread Stefan Fouant
Sounds like you've got most of it set up. If your tunnel interface is bound to the Trust zone and you haven't enabled the blocking of Intra-Zone traffic 'Network > Zones > Edit Trust Zone', then you don't need policy. If that's the case then it's most likely a routing issue... can you display the

Re: [j-nsp] Netscreen vpn

2008-05-17 Thread Stefan Fouant
'get interface' from the CLI or 'Network > Interfaces' from the WebUI. Stefan Fouant On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:16 PM, sunnyday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And another question how can I tell to which zone the tunnel interface is > bound? > > -Original Message- > From: Stefan Fouant [mai

Re: [j-nsp] Netscreen vpn

2008-05-17 Thread sunnyday
And another question how can I tell to which zone the tunnel interface is bound? -Original Message- From: Stefan Fouant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 6:58 PM To: sunnyday Cc: Juniper-Nsp; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Netscreen vpn There is just not enou

Re: [j-nsp] Netscreen vpn

2008-05-17 Thread sunnyday
I have only the default virtual routers the untrust zone is in trust vr I have configured the vpn and a bidirectional policy: from untrust to trust source dialup vpn destination any action tunnel what do I need to configure next to have access to the local network? -Original Message-

Re: [j-nsp] Netscreen vpn

2008-05-17 Thread Stefan Fouant
There is just not enough information supplied to determine the problem. Is the tunnel interface bound to the Trust zone, or the Untrust zone? If it's bound to the Trust zone and you haven't explicity blocked intrazone traffic then you don't need a policy. Are you using any other Virtual-Routers

[j-nsp] Netscreen vpn

2008-05-17 Thread sunnyday
Hello I have configured a dialup vpn and successfully created the tunnel and received ip address but I cannot manage to ping the netscreen`s Trust interface. The ip address the vpn has is 10.250.250.1 and the trust interface is 192.168.10.1. I tried with static routes and policies With no r

[j-nsp] RSVP to LDP

2008-05-17 Thread Plz
Hi, Dose anyone here have experience in changing rsvp to ldp? I've got a problem here. It's about a mpls-based network, about 50 P routers(M20 & M320) and 20 PE routers(M10i). The label distributing protocol is now the RSVP. LSP are created mannually. TE is not enabled. We want to change rsvp to l