Re: [j-nsp] Track-IP functionality in Junos

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:56:46PM +0200, Erdem Sener wrote: > Hello, > > Current JUNOS versions only support CLI commands to be triggered via > op/event scripts. This means that you can't > currently trigger a configuration change (delete route, deactivate > neighbor, change localpref etc) based

Re: [j-nsp] Track-IP functionality in Junos

Hello, Current JUNOS versions only support CLI commands to be triggered via op/event scripts. This means that you can't currently trigger a configuration change (delete route, deactivate neighbor, change localpref etc) based on those. Altering of the configuration via op/event scripts will be su

Re: [j-nsp] NAT

ck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature data

Re: [j-nsp] NAT

It's possible... Let's see your stateful-firewall rules... Stefan Fouant Principal Network Engineer NeuStar, Inc. - http://www.neustar.biz On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Manu Chao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I have configured Source NAT on a J router by using the public WAN IP for

Re: [j-nsp] Track-IP functionality in Junos

Masood: Therea re two ways you can do this: (a) BFD liveness: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos91/swconfig-routing/configuringbidirectional-forwarding-detection.html#id-10372527 (b) Generate a periodic event that triggers an event policy that does the ping and removes the st

[j-nsp] NAT

Hello, I have configured Source NAT on a J router by using the public WAN IP for the NAT pool range. NAT work fine but i can no longer manage my router from the public network... Questions: How can i correct my NAT configuration in order to manage my router with the same IP than the NAT POOL? Is

Re: [j-nsp] list admin garbage - unimportant you can delete me

Many thanks for running one of the leading mailing lists. Keep it up.. you are great Regards, Masood Ahmad Shah BLOG: http://www.weblogs.com.pk/jahil -Original Message- From: Jared Mauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 10:40 PM To: Masood Ahmad Shah Cc: 'Erik Er

[j-nsp] list admin garbage - unimportant you can delete me

Just as a follow-up, there are over 2500 people on the list. I wanted to thank everyone who helps make this forum what it is in helping each other out. - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from [EMAIL PROTECTED] clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~ja

Re: [j-nsp] Is this true

Cisco sent us one of these "neutral, unbiased comparisons a few years ago when we were evaluating routers. The other guy looked very bad until we realized that the other guy was configured to do RED and the Cisco was doing tail-drop. Cisco responded with an "Oops. We'll take that paper off of our

Re: [j-nsp] test - ignore

Pass :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Erasmus Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:10 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] test - ignore test to mailing list - ignore please ___

[j-nsp] Track-IP functionality in Junos

I am looking for a track-ip functionality in Junos, which will be able to retire a route based on IP reachability (ping or something like this) Is this anything we can do? Regards, Masood Ahmad Shah ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether

Re: [j-nsp] Only user login class super-user can execute reboot on Junos 8.5R3.4

Hi Amin, It sounds like PR/251722, and the strange is that none of the versions you're using are affected. Can you do a 'commit full' after you boot the box with 8.5R3.4 and see if the problem's still happening? Cheers, Erdem On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 3:01 AM, amin amin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: [j-nsp] Is this true

I'd really like to see a 10k with 61,500 oE/oA conns, maybe then we'd have more of them. :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Masood Ahmad Shah Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 1:10 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] Is this tru

Re: [j-nsp] Is this true

They just made a point to pick the router and OS which in not Juniper Home Grown. regards abhijeet.c - Original Message From: Masood Ahmad Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 11:40:21 PM Subject: [j-nsp] Is this true http://www.cisc

Re: [j-nsp] NAT Port translation on JUNOS, puzzled...

Hi, Thanks a lot. I'm almost there i think, but i'm left with a question. When i commit the following configuration, i cannot ping the outside interface anymore (from the outside). Are there any gotcha's left in this config? interfaces { fe-0/0/0 { description "Outside interface";

Re: [j-nsp] Forwarding next-hop - Aggreagate Ethernet

Not to my knowledge. If you are having issues with load balancing between L3 next-hops and aggregate bundle members (when the load is not equally distributed between aggregate members), you might want to consider the indexed-next-hop feature. James 2008/6/18 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi all, >