[j-nsp] No-concatenate of a STM16 using dark fibre?

Hi! I'm trying to un-concatenate an STM16 - STM16 interfaces into 4xSTM4 links on a dark fiber link, however I simply can't get the links to come up in either SDH or SONET modes. [EMAIL PROTECTED]> show interfaces so-1/1/0:0 Physical interface: so-1/1/0:0, Enabled, Physical link is Down Interfa

Re: [j-nsp] vrrp: dileep

Hi, On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 01:03:18PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I see the same message whenever issuing 'show vrrp' from CLI. I heard > that this can be ignored because this is a meaningless message. Indeed, that's what another off-list reply indicated as well, supposed to be fixed in 9.

Re: [j-nsp] Load-Balance on Internet Processor II

Hm, that's sounds good, Also, i have another L2 ASPIC in my hand and will install that later on to see if lsq interface appears. Thanks Stefan -Original Message- From: Stefan Fouant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 6:13 PM To: Ilker YILMAZ Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; j

Re: [j-nsp] Load-Balance on Internet Processor II

Yep, you can't run Layer 2 and Layer 3 services on that PIC at the same time. If you've got the sp interface configured, it sounds to me like you might have some Layer 3 services configured. If you do a 'set chassis fpc 0 pic 2 adaptive-services service-package layer-2' you'll convert that MS-PIC

Re: [j-nsp] Load-Balance on Internet Processor II

:) FPC 0E-FPC PIC 2 REV 14 750-014895 DH5587MultiServices 100 PIC 3 REV 17 750-007626 CZ173010x CHE1 IQ There is no predefined and configureable lsq interface seen at M10i when you run "show

[j-nsp] testing email: do not read

thanks ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Load-Balance on Internet Processor II

Dude... it's lsq-x/x/x... x/x/x corresponds to whatever FPC/PIC combination you've got your AS or MS PIC installed. The slot should always be 0 on these interfaces. So if you've got an MS-PIC installed in FPC 2, PIC 1... the interface should be lsq-2/1/0. Do a 'show chassis hardware' to identify

Re: [j-nsp] Next Gen MVPN and signalling protocol

Hello, You can change preference of rsvp signaled lsps globally or per LSP : set protocols mpls preference 10 or only for particular lsp: set protocols mpls label-switched-path xxx preference 10 Krasi > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:juniper-nsp- > [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [j-nsp] Load-Balance on Internet Processor II

Thanks Steinar & Erdem for your help, i see ls-0/0/0 interface at J4350 whereas i have no clue about at M10i interface naming for MLPPP. Does anybody have information on that? Thanks! Ilker -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 200

Re: [j-nsp] Next Gen MVPN and signalling protocol

Geez... I think that just won the award for the most technical acryonyms ever used in a single sentence! -- Stefan Fouant Principal Network Engineer NeuStar, Inc. - http://www.neustar.biz GPG Key ID: 0xB5E3803D On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Samuel, > p2mp RSV

[j-nsp] Testing e-mail: Do NOT read

Thanks ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Next Gen MVPN and signalling protocol

Samuel, p2mp RSVP LSP egress LSR lo0.0 IP@ are not present in inet.0/inet.3 and therefore unicast traffic cannot use NGEN MVPN p2mp LSP. If you have p2p RSVP LSP and you stll want to use LDP (cannot imagine why but let's assume so) then consider changing next-hops of IPv4 unicast/L3VPN/L2VPN ro

Re: [j-nsp] Next Gen MVPN and signalling protocol

Of course, you may also need to do some filtering or modify protocol preferences to ensure that the RSVP routes are not populated into your unicast routing tables or if they are, that they should be less preferred than your LDP routes. -- Stefan Fouant Principal Network Engineer NeuStar, Inc. - h

Re: [j-nsp] Next Gen MVPN and signalling protocol

You should be able to do this by configuring PIM/MSDP to use inet.2 for RPF, then use rib groups and policy to make sure you import your direct routes, IGP routes, and RSVP routes (but not LDP routes) into inet.2. -- Stefan Fouant Principal Network Engineer NeuStar, Inc. - http://www.neustar.biz

[j-nsp] Next Gen MVPN and signalling protocol

Hi group, This is my "problem": We have an MPLS backbone using LDP. We are configuring Next Gen MVPN. For that we have to configure RSVP on all the core router. The problem is that we would like to keep LDP for the data and RSVP for the multicast, but like RSVP has a preference of 7 and LDP has

Re: [j-nsp] Load-Balance on Internet Processor II

> Do you know which interface naming is available at J4350 & M10i for MLPPP ? > I see ls-0/0/0 interface at J4350 and lsi.x at M10i (Includes MSPIC) Interface naming depends on what PICs you have. Here's an example from an M7i with ASM, channelized STM-1 and 4 E1s in a bundle using the ASM: e1-0/

Re: [j-nsp] Only user login class super-user can execute reboot on Junos 8.5R3.4

If I use commit full stil not resolve, But if I reboot this system again, it 's solved Thanks Amin On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Erdem Sener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Amin, > > I'm not sure I follow you .. If I understand you correctly: > > a- upgrade from xxx ---> 8.4R3.4 ---> 8.5R