Re: [j-nsp] Can't assign requested address ??

On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Farhan Jaffer wrote: I am connecting my laptop with M7i Fa ptp ip address. Ping from Laptop to M7i ptp address is fine, but reverse gives the amazing result *ping 30.40.50.2 source 30.40.50.1 ping: bind: Can't assign requested address* Even i connect this interface to switc

Re: [j-nsp] Can't assign requested address ??

Got it. Thanks! On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Bjorn Tore Paulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wrong routing-instance? > > /BT > > > -Opprinnelig melding- > > Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Farhan Jaffer > > Sendt: 26. august 2008 08:23 > > Til: Juniper

[j-nsp] Can't assign requested address ??

Hi, I am connecting my laptop with M7i Fa ptp ip address. Ping from Laptop to M7i ptp address is fine, but reverse gives the amazing result *ping 30.40.50.2 source 30.40.50.1 ping: bind: Can't assign requested address* Even i connect this interface to switch, observing the same behavior. What is

Re: [j-nsp] LDP Session over GRE Tunnel

Is there any way to adjust MTU on tunnel OR we have to do on source interface only? I don't find any option in juniper on tunnel interfaces. On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Farhan Jaffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes exactly Masood. But if LDP won't work i am not able to do > anything. And it'

Re: [j-nsp] LDP Session over GRE Tunnel

Yes exactly Masood. But if LDP won't work i am not able to do anything. And it's not working. If the MTU size is mismatch OR less than 1500, LDP session establish or not? There is no ACL / prefix list in b/w. On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Masood Ahmad Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yea you

Re: [j-nsp] DRAM for M7

Hi Matthias, JuniperClue has a list of modules that people have used, http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Route_Engine_DRAM_Compatibility#RE-5.0_Generic_DRAM --John Matthias Gelbhardt wrote: Hello! What kind of RAM modules can I use for the M7? Do I have to use Juniper RAM or can I use al

[j-nsp] DRAM for M7

Hello! What kind of RAM modules can I use for the M7? Do I have to use Juniper RAM or can I use alternate modules? Regards, Matthias ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Strange RX issue w/ GE PIC

Unfortunately, the built-in optics in the PICs does not afford me this luxury. Levels are good, though, according to optical power meter readings. On the end getting the errors, I am using an LH PIC back-to-back with an LH SFP on the WDM box connected to M20-A. I am attenuating 20dB on the RX

Re: [j-nsp] Strange RX issue w/ GE PIC

Have you tried the "show interfaces diagnostics optics" to check the power levels? Regards. Ricardo. On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Eric Van Tol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > I'm experiencing a strange RX issue on a link and I need some more ideas on > where to look. Two routers

Re: [j-nsp] Strange RX issue w/ GE PIC

> -Original Message- > From: Masood Ahmad Shah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 12:51 PM > To: Eric Van Tol; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Strange RX issue w/ GE PIC > > There can be multiple reasons for these input errors. > > Policed Discards

Re: [j-nsp] Strange RX issue w/ GE PIC

> -Original Message- > From: Rubens Kuhl Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 11:41 AM > To: Eric Van Tol > Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Strange RX issue w/ GE PIC > > Sounds like reflection; although RX and TX are different wavelenghts, >

Re: [j-nsp] Strange RX issue w/ GE PIC

There can be multiple reasons for these input errors. Policed Discards Frames that the incoming packet match code discarded because they were not recognized or of interest. Usually, this field reports protocols that the JUNOS software does not handle, such as CDP. L3 incompletes This counter is

Re: [j-nsp] LDP Session over GRE Tunnel

Yea you can have established LSP without LDP. Guess how :) What if you are running both LDP and RSVP... ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Junaid Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 8:35 PM To: Farhan Jaffer Cc: Juniper Puck Subject: Re: [j-n

Re: [j-nsp] LDP Session over GRE Tunnel

Two things can prevent LDP adjacencies MTU, fragmentation or access list. You need to check MTU size at both sides as you are using tunnel interfaces. You may need to look at data fragmentation too, in both cases try adjusting MTU size. Look into IGP prefix lists, distribute lists or access-lis

Re: [j-nsp] Strange RX issue w/ GE PIC

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Eric Van Tol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > I'm experiencing a strange RX issue on a link and I need some more ideas on > where to look. Two routers, an M7i and M20, are connected back-to-back, > sort-of (there's optical gear between them, obviously), ov

Re: [j-nsp] LDP Session over GRE Tunnel

Hi, Check the transport addresses used by LDP on both nodes. These addresses should be reachable via IGP or static routes over the GRE. It is surprising that LSP is established without LDP! Regards, Junaid On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Farhan Jaffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am

[j-nsp] Strange RX issue w/ GE PIC

Hi all, I'm experiencing a strange RX issue on a link and I need some more ideas on where to look. Two routers, an M7i and M20, are connected back-to-back, sort-of (there's optical gear between them, obviously), over a WDM link. Ping tests work perfectly from one to the other, using various pa

Re: [j-nsp] Restricting RADIUS Routes for E120

Right, that makes sense. However, maybe you should use static routes and check them for reachability with BFD instead of using OSPF if you think that your RADIUS server might be misconfigured with a 0/0 framed route. If you run OSPF for just the default route then you can achieve the same t

[j-nsp] LDP Session over GRE Tunnel

Hi, I am testing connectivity over GRE tunnel, IBGP session is established, LSP is also established, however LDP session is not going to establish. Any idea? FJ ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/lis

Re: [j-nsp] Restricting RADIUS Routes for E120

Yea ignoring radius attribute is not a solution because you are the one sending it and why the heck you will ignore it :) Well, I suggest you add another static default route pointing to same gateway the one you are learning over OSPF. In this case if you learn default route on user profile you wi

Re: [j-nsp] Restricting RADIUS Routes for E120

Dear Truman, The Radius server used in my network is used to provide all the users with thier assigned IP subnets, and the assigned routes to the users are access-internal routes I have a default route in the E120 Router known via OSPF from my Gateway, so when the RADIUS Server b

Re: [j-nsp] Restricting RADIUS Routes for E120

Hi Amr, Your RADIUS server is located upstream from the E120 right? Ie. It is not an access-internal route but rather it is reachable via another protocol such as BGP, static, or OSPF. Adjusting protocol preferences is less than ideal and you should avoid this in almost all designs. Why d

Re: [j-nsp] Restricting RADIUS Routes for E120

Dear Masood , Thanks , but can this change be made from the E120 Side ? Regards Amr On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Masood Ahmad Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Yea you can set the route preferences ( In Cisco world administrative > distance ). For this you need to find the

Re: [j-nsp] Restricting RADIUS Routes for E120

Yea you can set the route preferences ( In Cisco world administrative distance ). For this you need to find the route preference radius attribute ... here is the list of supported radius attributes... http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/erx/erx50x/swconfig-broadband/html/ radius-attributes.h