Nope, my experience is changing from 2 to 8 aex with no downtime to existing
aex nor restarting the box.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Mustafa Golam - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Our current configuration is :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> show configuration chassis aggregated-devices
> ethernet {
>
My experience in decreasing the number of aggregated fast ethernet : No
Impact [notice that the traffic has been calculated]
No need to restart the router, neither need to deactivate/activate the
ae.x sub interfaces.
a. r. isnaini rangkayo sutan
Has anyone has similar experience?
Did
Our current configuration is :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> show configuration chassis aggregated-devices
ethernet {
device-count 5;
}
Recent increase in demand and network utilization is asking to make at least
10 aggregated ethernet ports.
if we execute:*set chassis aggregated-devices ethernet devic
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:12:27PM +0300, Pavel Lunin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Mark Tinka wrote:
> >They've actually switched to RLDRAM (32MB of it, to be
> >exact).
> >
> Do you have any information regarding the number of active routes it is
> able to store?
32MB is the same as on the MX, so if the
Hi all:
quick question:
if an is-is router receives the same route from different adjacencies and all
of them have the same metric values besides they all have the same preference,
then what is next criteria to select the route for routing table?
Start your day with Yahoo!7 and win a
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, German Martinez wrote:
We have an scenario where we have a bunch of routes in the routing table (RE)
but we only let one default route go to the PFE.
We achieve that by using forwarding filters.
Could someone clarify Juniper's uRPF implementation, when only a default route
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Bit Gossip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you want to sample all traffic, as it appears from your config, you
> don't really need a fw filter but you can use the following simple form:
>
>ge-0/0/0 {
>unit 0 {
>family inet {
>s
If you want to sample all traffic, as it appears from your config, you
don't really need a fw filter but you can use the following simple form:
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family inet {
sampling {
input;
}
}
}
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 6:11 AM, Mark Tech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> I am having a bit of trouble trying to do the following NAT with static
> mapping, i.e:
>
> src 2.2.2.2 dest 1.1.1.1 (tr) NETSCREEN (dmz) src 10.1.1.254 dest 10.1.1.1
> src 2.2.2.2 dest 1.1.1.2 (tr) NETSCREEN (dmz) src 10.
Hello,
We have an scenario where we have a bunch of routes in the routing table (RE)
but we only let one default route go to the PFE.
We achieve that by using forwarding filters.
Could someone clarify Juniper's uRPF implementation, when only a default route
is installed in the PFE?
Are the uRPF
'Enhanced' means that the card is based on EZChip RevB. Non 'E' cards are
based on EZChip RevA and are retired.Marlon
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:24 AM, Pavel Lunin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone know what letter 'E' means in DPC codes? Is there any technical
> difference betwe
Hi,
Try to create the filter at the "firewall family inet" hierarchy level. For
IPV4 we can create filter at either "firewall" or "firewall family inet"
hierarchy level but I don't know if there is some requierements for sampling
filter.
David
De: [EMAIL
Hi,
I am trying to export flow data from my M10i to a linux box for nfsen to
graph, but its not working. Can anybody help me out. Thank you in advance.
Below is my configuration
interfaces {
so-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family inet {
filter {
argh. Nevermind. As usual, i figured it out shortly after sending out a
request for help. The 'user' needs to be the same name as the 'class' in order
for this to work. So obvious, yet overlooked.
-evt
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:juniper-nsp-
> [EMAIL PROT
DPCs provide multiple physical interfaces and Packet Forwarding Engines on a
single
board that installs in a slot in the Juniper Networks MX-series Ethernet
Services Router.
A DPC receives incoming packets from the network and sends outgoing packets
to the
network. The Packet Forwarding Engines on
Hi all,
I'm trying to configure JUNOS for RADIUS authentication and I've gotten to the
point where the user is granted access, but for some reason is immediately
logged out of the router:
-= 11:35:13 - /home/eric =-
[506 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ssh -l test1 172.16.200.170
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s passwor
Hi,
As far as I remember DPCE cards has enhanced ASICs for increased
performance and scalability of Layer 2 features.
Best regards,
Natasa
Pavel Lunin wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone know what letter 'E' means in DPC cod
Hi all,
Does anyone know what letter 'E' means in DPC codes? Is there any
technical difference between DPCE-R-2XGE-XFP and DPC-R-4XGE-XFP other
than just number of ports?
--
Kind regards,
Pavel
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.ne
Hi
I am having a bit of trouble trying to do the following NAT with static
mapping, i.e:
src 2.2.2.2 dest 1.1.1.1 (tr) NETSCREEN (dmz) src 10.1.1.254 dest 10.1.1.1
src 2.2.2.2 dest 1.1.1.2 (tr) NETSCREEN (dmz) src 10.1.1.254 dest 10.1.1.2
src 2.2.2.2 dest 1.1.1.x (tr) NETSCREEN (dmz) src 10.1.1.2
On Wednesday 03 December 2008 17:12:27 Pavel Lunin wrote:
> Do you have any information regarding the number of
> active routes it is able to store?
Still waiting to hear from my SE on that.
But I understand it's only available later next year.
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digit
Hi!
Mark Tinka wrote:
They've actually switched to RLDRAM (32MB of it, to be
exact).
Do you have any information regarding the number of active routes it is
able to store?
--
Kind regards,
Pavel
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nethe
21 matches
Mail list logo
