Re: [j-nsp] Bgp peer sessions flap in 165k-245k pps/sec DoS

2009-02-15 Thread Samit
After doing further investigation, I found that in-fact my Cisco-vxr Npe-g2 and g1 in the path (between M7i and customer router) suffered the Dos and due to cpu saturation the bgp flapped. Earlier I did not noticed because the cpu utilization graph of Cisco showed only 50% in npe-g2 and 80% in npe

Re: [j-nsp] Bgp peer sessions flap in 165k-245k pps/sec DoS

2009-02-15 Thread Nilesh Khambal
I don't see any drops in the sofware or hardware queues towards RE. So it does not look like it was this router that was affected by DOS attack and caused BGP flap. As Stefan mentioned, check the logs for the BGP notification reason and to find out if we sent or received the Notification.

Re: [j-nsp] Bgp peer sessions flap in 165k-245k pps/sec DoS

2009-02-15 Thread Stefan Fouant
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Samit wrote: > I do have filter in placed to protect the RE. But the attack is not > targeted or directed to any interfaces of my router. My customer network > as under DoS attacked , tcpdump snapshot attached below "x" is source > and "y" is target. If the atta

Re: [j-nsp] SNMP interface index change after upgrade to 9.2

2009-02-15 Thread Derick Winkworth
I'm late jumping into this conversation, but are you using virtual-chassis by chance? Did the order of the individual units change when you upgraded? Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Tore Anderson said: > >> * Chris Adams >> >>> Never used Cisco I guess? >>> >> I have. As

Re: [j-nsp] SNMP interface index change after upgrade to 9.2

2009-02-15 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Tore Anderson said: > * Chris Adams > > Never used Cisco I guess? > > I have. As Steinar haug has already pointed out, IOS supports keeping > ifIndexes static. Fortunately someone had the good sense to enable that > feature, so they've never caused me any problems. I guess I

Re: [j-nsp] SNMP interface index change after upgrade to 9.2

2009-02-15 Thread Tore Anderson
* Chris Adams > Never used Cisco I guess? I have. As Steinar haug has already pointed out, IOS supports keeping ifIndexes static. Fortunately someone had the good sense to enable that feature, so they've never caused me any problems. -- Tore Anderson Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-lin

Re: [j-nsp] Bgp peer sessions flap in 165k-245k pps/sec DoS

2009-02-15 Thread Samit
I do have filter in placed to protect the RE. But the attack is not targeted or directed to any interfaces of my router. My customer network as under DoS attacked , tcpdump snapshot attached below "x" is source and "y" is target. 04:16:18.225986 IP x.x.x.x.12372 > y.y.y.y.18990: UDP, length 36 0

[j-nsp] Junos 9.2: Invalid URL scheme

2009-02-15 Thread Bit Gossip
The scp URL works fine in the 'file copy' but not in the 'request system software add' Is this a bug or a feature? Thanks, bit. l...@olive-00> request system software add "scp://l...@192.168.122.254/jinstall-9.3R2.8-domestic-signed.tgz" fetch: scp://l...@192.168.122.254/jinstall-9.3R2.8-domesti

Re: [j-nsp] Bgp peer sessions flap in 165k-245k pps/sec DoS

2009-02-15 Thread Nilesh Khambal
Hi Samit, Do you have the output of "show pfe statistics traffic" from this router? What was the type of DoS attack traffic? Was it directed to any of the interfaces on the router? Did you have any filter applied to loopback interface to drop such traffic? If yes, did any of the filter