Re: [j-nsp] Build a GRE tunnel on VRRP routers

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 05:15:27PM +0100, Sean Clarke wrote: > Not as a protocol to bring down the GRE tunnel. > > You can use OSPF with BFD though and make the tunnel endpoints known via > OSPF. > I know it's not ideal, but it'll work. Or you can use BFD on static routes that nail up the tunnel

Re: [j-nsp] Build a GRE tunnel on VRRP routers

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 09:08:51AM -0500, Stefan Fouant wrote: > GRE Keepalives are *still* not supported? I remember asking for this > in an enhancement request almost 5 years ago... geez... Unless your name is AT&T, you can pretty much assume that any of your requests or ideas are gonna fall o

Re: [j-nsp] Question on BGP Peering/Upstream STM1-Juniper

Hai TQ,   U mean the interface at provider site must be normal clear channel STM1?... from my site if iam using channelize STM1 it doesnt effect righ because..the bandwidth is control by my provider...am i right?   no MLPPP in the design as have limitation and might got problem in the features..

Re: [j-nsp] Question on BGP Peering/Upstream STM1-Juniper

On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, chenoi A wrote: >> For information...iam using cSTM1... ..if my customer request for 4M >> internet via ethernet port..then i will request from my upstream for >> 4M internet...may i know how is the configuraton here Well, you can try to start with: http://www.juniper.n

[j-nsp] Question on BGP Peering/Upstream STM1-Juniper

he latter, less configuration hassle given the application. Channelized STM-1 makes more sense for customer PE-side customer aggregation in n x E1 increments. Cheers, Mark. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pg

Re: [j-nsp] Question on BGP Peering/Upstream STM1-Juniper M10i

On Monday 23 February 2009 10:22:17 pm chenoi A wrote: > run bgp between both router. This stm1 will be the trunk > and our upstream initially will provide perMeg basis in > this trunk...initally 1xE1 until the STM1 trunk full > capasity. Interconnection is STM1 but the > internet provided by upst

Re: [j-nsp] Build a GRE tunnel on VRRP routers

On 2/23/09 4:19 PM, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Sean Clarke said: GRE keepalives are not supported. Does BFD work on GRE? Not as a protocol to bring down the GRE tunnel. You can use OSPF with BFD though and make the tunnel endpoints known via OSPF. I know it's not

[j-nsp] Question on BGP Peering/Upstream STM1-Juniper M10i

Hai...   Need some info and guideline.   I am newbies and this is the first time handling the m10i router. my compny want to setup layer 3 network. and upstream with one provider stm1   M10i--STM1---Upstream Provider   run bgp between both router. This stm1 will be the trunk and our upstre

Re: [j-nsp] Build a GRE tunnel on VRRP routers

Once upon a time, Sean Clarke said: > GRE keepalives are not supported. Does BFD work on GRE? -- Chris Adams Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. ___ juniper-nsp ma

Re: [j-nsp] Build a GRE tunnel on VRRP routers

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Sean Clarke wrote: > GRE keepalives are not supported. > You'd need to use some dynamic protocol , OSPF for instance, and build GRE > tunnels based on the dynamically learned addresses (loopback for instance), > if you want to achieve some sort of dynamic GRE tunne

Re: [j-nsp] Output rate on E1 link

Is bundle transmitting all 18 Mbps of traffic? Are there any drops on bundle or individual E1 interface? Thanks, Nilesh On Feb 22, 2009, at 11:41 PM, "Faizal Rachman" wrote: This is result from other router who has same output : show interfaces ls-1/2/0.1 Logical interface ls-1/2/0.