Re: [j-nsp] nsrp ha link over ex4200

2009-04-28 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:17:04AM +0300, Yordan Boikov wrote: > Hi, > > we have two SSG 520M firewalls and two ex4200 switches > > > [ SSG520M fw1 ][eth1/7] - [ge-0/0/3][ ex4200 sw1 > ][ge-0/1/2]===trunk===[ge-0/1/2][ ex4200 sw2 ][ge-0/0/3] > [eth1/7][ SSG520M fw2 ] > > I want to

Re: [j-nsp] display mpls table

2009-04-28 Thread Andrew Jimmy
Yup, this is an ingress PE -Original Message- From: Nilesh Khambal [mailto:nkham...@juniper.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 9:30 PM To: Andrew Jimmy Cc: 'Stefan Fouant'; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] display mpls table Is this an ingress PE? Nilesh Andrew Jimm

Re: [j-nsp] display mpls table

2009-04-28 Thread Harry Reynolds
Never mind, Stacy has the right answer I beleive: --- JUNOS 9.1S1.1 built 2009-04-17 17:50:33 UTC % cli regr...@keller> show route table mpls.0 mpls.0: 11 destinations, 11 routes (11 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both 0 *[MPLS/0] 02:29:27

Re: [j-nsp] display mpls table

2009-04-28 Thread Nilesh Khambal
Is this an ingress PE? Nilesh Andrew Jimmy wrote: I know one can displays the route for the LDP FECs, stored in inet.3 using 'show route ldp table inet.3'. What if you want to see the label-switching state stored in mpls.0 For this you use 'show route table mpls.0'; now I don't know why this j

Re: [j-nsp] display mpls table

2009-04-28 Thread Harry Reynolds
Because those active routes are not in the mpls table. That is a summary banner for the sum of all routing tables. Do a show route to see all routes in all tables. The "missing" active routes will be found spread over the remaining non-mpls.0 tables. HTHs -Original Message- From:

[j-nsp] EX4200 dhcp-snooping-file

2009-04-28 Thread Chuck Anderson
Has anyone successfully used the EX4200 dhcp-snooping-file feature on JunOS 9.4? I have it configured and it created a zero-length file, but never becomes populated with dhcp snooping binding table information. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] display mpls table

2009-04-28 Thread Stacy W. Smith
Because they were installed by some protocol other than 'mpls'. Likely 'ldp' and/or 'rsvp'. If you want to see all of the active routes in the mpls.0 table regardless of the protocol that installed them, then simply execute 'show route table mpls.0'. --Stacy On Apr 28, 2009, at 1:49 PM

Re: [j-nsp] display mpls table

2009-04-28 Thread Andrew Jimmy
I know one can displays the route for the LDP FECs, stored in inet.3 using 'show route ldp table inet.3'. What if you want to see the label-switching state stored in mpls.0 For this you use 'show route table mpls.0'; now I don't know why this juniper router is not displaying the label-switching st

Re: [j-nsp] display mpls table

2009-04-28 Thread Stefan Fouant
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Andrew Jimmy wrote: > When you run the following command, why you can't see the 679 active routes. > > junos> show route protocol mpls table mpls.0 > > mpls.0: 679 destinations, 679 routes (679 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) > > + = Active Route, - = Last Active, *

[j-nsp] display mpls table

2009-04-28 Thread Andrew Jimmy
When you run the following command, why you can't see the 679 active routes. junos> show route protocol mpls table mpls.0 mpls.0: 679 destinations, 679 routes (679 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both 0 *[MPLS/0] 4w5d 13

Re: [j-nsp] nsrp ha link over ex4200

2009-04-28 Thread Tim Eberhard
Silly question... Why would you not just cable the firewalls directly into each other? What is the point of adding a couple of additional points of failure if you don't have to? Unless you're working with two firewalls at two physical geographic locations I see no reason to have a switch in betwe

[j-nsp] nsrp ha link over ex4200

2009-04-28 Thread Yordan Boikov
Hi, we have two SSG 520M firewalls and two ex4200 switches [ SSG520M fw1 ][eth1/7] - [ge-0/0/3][ ex4200 sw1 ][ge-0/1/2]===trunk===[ge-0/1/2][ ex4200 sw2 ][ge-0/0/3] [eth1/7][ SSG520M fw2 ] I want to configure HA between fw1 and fw2 the problem is that sw2 doesn't see fw1 sw1>sho