Re: [j-nsp] ex4200 log message question

2009-05-20 Thread Cord MacLeod
Much appreciated. On May 20, 2009, at 5:37 PM, Malte von dem Hagen wrote: Cord, Am 21.05.2009 02:23 Uhr, Cord MacLeod schrieb: Every now and again I'm seeing the following log message: May 20 22:23:34 gsw1 fpc1 Resolve request came for an address matching on Wrong nh nh:1499, type:Hold...?

Re: [j-nsp] ex4200 log message question

2009-05-20 Thread Malte von dem Hagen
Cord, Am 21.05.2009 02:23 Uhr, Cord MacLeod schrieb: > Every now and again I'm seeing the following log message: > > May 20 22:23:34 gsw1 fpc1 Resolve request came for an address > matching on Wrong nh nh:1499, type:Hold...? > May 20 23:08:03 gsw1 fpc1 Resolve request came for an address >

[j-nsp] ex4200 log message question

2009-05-20 Thread Cord MacLeod
Every now and again I'm seeing the following log message: May 20 22:23:34 gsw1 fpc1 Resolve request came for an address matching on Wrong nh nh:1499, type:Hold...? May 20 23:08:03 gsw1 fpc1 Resolve request came for an address matching on Wrong nh nh:1501, type:Hold...? Any ideas what thi

Re: [j-nsp] DOS attack?

2009-05-20 Thread Matthias Gelbhardt
Hi! I may open a JTAC case, when I understand for which problem I should open one. The following has happened: The system (J6350) is running under 9.3R2.8, so we decided to update to 9.4R2.8. That was a desaster, and I hope you can help also in this matter. After upgrading the systems, b

Re: [j-nsp] Ex Series Bandwidth Policer

2009-05-20 Thread Dave Diller
On May 19, 2009, at 6:02 PM, mas...@nexlinx.net.pk wrote: The way you have done it, bandwidth will be shared among multiple interfaces. Adding filter-specific knob to the policer will make them unique. The documentation doesn't seem to indicate that "policer will by default be shared among