Re: [j-nsp] IPv6 best practice

2009-05-25 Thread Matthias Gelbhardt
Hi! Perhaps the great advantage we have, is that our network is rather small at the moment. So this might be the perfect time to start the use of IPv6 apart from starting to using it right from the beginning. In the meantime I have run a few tests, and it seems to be very easy to set up a

Re: [j-nsp] IPv6 best practice

2009-05-25 Thread Truman Boyes
Hi, Congrats! If you have MPLS in your backbone, you can continue to use IPv4 as the transport for your MPLS signaling. With this approach you can run 6VPE and build a VPN for your inet6 traffic. This is a common approach for "getting things going". All v6 stuff just rides across MPLS and

Re: [j-nsp] IPv6 best practice

2009-05-25 Thread Chris Morrow
On Mon, 25 May 2009, Jared Mauch wrote: On May 25, 2009, at 8:32 AM, Matthias Gelbhardt wrote: Hi! Today we received our IPv6 prefix from RIPE. There are many projects in the pipeline, so we would like to enable our network with IPv6 and would like to start new projects with default depl

Re: [j-nsp] IPv6 best practice

2009-05-25 Thread Jared Mauch
On May 25, 2009, at 8:32 AM, Matthias Gelbhardt wrote: Hi! Today we received our IPv6 prefix from RIPE. There are many projects in the pipeline, so we would like to enable our network with IPv6 and would like to start new projects with default deployment in IPv6. What would be the best p

[j-nsp] IPv6 best practice

2009-05-25 Thread Matthias Gelbhardt
Hi! Today we received our IPv6 prefix from RIPE. There are many projects in the pipeline, so we would like to enable our network with IPv6 and would like to start new projects with default deployment in IPv6. What would be the best practice to bring our backbone to IPv6? Would one use a v