Re: [j-nsp] M7i crashes

2009-06-02 Thread Nilesh Khambal
Hi, Next time it crashes, Please type "panic" at db> prompt a couple of times. This will cause M7i to generate a kernel coredump and then reset automatically. Please open a case with JTAC and provide them with this corefile. They will be able to figure out the root cause for this problem T

[j-nsp] M7i crashes

2009-06-02 Thread snort bsd
Hi all: I have one M7i; sometimes for some unknown reasons it crashes. From the console port, I can see it is in following state: db> after I typed "c" and I got: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x58 fault code = supervisor read, page not

Re: [j-nsp] RPD soft assertion failed

2009-06-02 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 03:06:35PM +0200, Daniel Verlouw wrote: > On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 19:01 +0200, Daniel Verlouw wrote: > > JTAC has decoded the core dumps and on initial analysis it appears to > > match PR 448745 - RPD core at krt_inh_lock_internal. The PR doesn't > > mention 9.3 as affecte

Re: [j-nsp] vlan setting in olive/qemu

2009-06-02 Thread Tomasz Klicki
Bit Gossip pisze: > So my conclusion is that this vlan setting has NO effect at all. > Any idea? Yes! ;-) Qemu parameter '-net xxx,vlan=yyy' has nothing related to 802.1q tagging. It only defines how to connect network interfaces inside qemu virtual host. You must define tagging inside your guest

[j-nsp] vlan setting in olive/qemu

2009-06-02 Thread Bit Gossip
Experts, does anybody understand the meaning of the 2 vlan parameters in the following entry: -net nic,macaddr=00:1A:4B:91:F1:00,vlan=0,model=i82559er -net tap,vlan=0,ifname=tap100,script=./qemu-ifup \ I have done the following tests: - whatever VLAN I put there if I tcpdump on the tap interface,

Re: [j-nsp] RPD soft assertion failed

2009-06-02 Thread Daniel Verlouw
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 19:01 +0200, Daniel Verlouw wrote: > JTAC has decoded the core dumps and on initial analysis it appears to > match PR 448745 - RPD core at krt_inh_lock_internal. The PR doesn't > mention 9.3 as affected though. I'll keep the list posted on any > progress. JTAC is now sa