With ip6-tunneling command (assuming you have that configured), JUNOS
will convert the v4 LSP route in inet.3 to a 6to4 v6 format in inet6.3.
This route is just used to resolve the vpn-v6 prefixes received from
remote PE and not for actual traffic forwarding. Traffic forwarding
should still hap
Hi,
I am trying to establish 6VPE (V6 over V4 vpn) with Juniper M320, but I
could see there is some problem in installing V6 routes sent by Redback
Smart Edge to Juno.
Where as the V6 routes sent by Juno are successfully installed in SE
routing table.
I am seeing the following problem in Jun
"but one particular subnet pair is exchanging quite a bit of traffic). All
of
> the addresses are unique within our domain"
Can you clarify the nature of you test traffic to the busy subnet in question?
1. Number of vrf ingress interfaces?
2. Number of source-Ips
3. Number of destination ips
Steven,
Thanks for the response. I was unaware of this limitation in the ABC-
chip, but I am still curious as to why the incoming traffic to the PE,
which should be hashed at IP only, is not properly balanced across the
outbound (MPLS) links. The lookup is done on the IP header only,
whi
Hi Christian,
The problem your hitting is a limitation of the M10i chip set. It can
only look at the top two labels and since both top labels are the same for
all this traffic it's going to look like the same flow and send it all
across the same link. The only way I've been able to get a sim
Correct. It seemed you were asking about interfaces (logical units) and vlans.
Not aware of a cli that displays what vlans have filters. Perhaps an er is
there.
Regards
-Original Message-
From: Dan Farrell [mailto:da...@appliedi.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:56 AM
To: Harr
NSP-ers,
I have a Cisco---Juniper pair connected over a pair of T3 links. The
Juniper acts as a PE and is pushing two labels for a specific route
learned on the PE destined to a single remote PE well beyond the Cisco
P. The traffic is destined to several IP addresses clustered in this
s
That seems to be applicable to interfaces, not to vlans themselves. It did not
return information on the filter I've applied to a vlan itself. Maybe I'm
confusing something.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Harry Reynolds [mailto:ha...@juniper.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:46 PM
Does show interfaces filters help?
Regards
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dan Farrell
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:25 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] EX series VLAN filte
I've been getting closer to implementing filters on a particular EX3200 I'm
using, and I noticed that the verification capabilities in the CLI for filters
(specifically, where they are applied) is pretty weak. For instance, I can't
find a standard way to see a list of what ports, interfaces, or
10 matches
Mail list logo