Pls have a look here,
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos90/swconfig-network-
interfaces/stacking-and-rewriting-gigabit-ethernet-iq-vlan-tags.html#id-
12141009
Hope it helps!
Thanks & Regards,
Tarique A. Nalkhande
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.
I have an incoming Ethernet which is double 802.1q tagged. Ie outer vlan
2000 inter vlan 1000.
Is there anyway I can remove the outervlan 2000 before placing it into a
Ethernet-? I have a MX960 with a 40-port Gigabit Ethernet R EQ card
installed in it.
I have been reading this page on
I was running 9.5r1.8, all I did was add a vlan member to the physcial
port that's tagged to the m7i and traffic stopped on that interface.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 27, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 02:18:16PM -0400, Brendan Mannella wrote:
I was wonderi
I have a number of EX series switches carrying vlans back to a central MX
480.
I have remote customers running bgp with their sessions terminating on the
MX. Currently the whole system operates in layer two.
I would like to move to a partial mesh deployment and use MPLS-CCC to carry
the EX
Once upon a time, Eugeniu Patrascu said:
> It's common on j-nsp and c-nsp for people to try to find other CF cards
> to put in the routers instead of buying vendor branded ones. I don't see
> nothing wrong with that. The same as with the optics.
One difference is that changing the CF card on an
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 02:18:16PM -0400, Brendan Mannella wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone has ever seen a EX4200 drop OSPF/BGP session when
> adding a vlan member to a interface?
>
> ge-0/1/2 {
> description ge-1-3-0.m7i.pit2;
> unit 0 {
> family ethernet-switching
Jonathan Brashear wrote:
That seems a bit dishonest, no? Given that the only part they won't support is the one you're switching out for the sake of getting support doesn't strike me as above board. Maybe I'm alone on this.
I was just saying that in case for some reason JTAC decides not to
I have found some info about frame-relay CCC and I would imagine the ATM CCC
would be similar, but I am a little confused as to which CCC variant of ATM
I will need and it can still land one of those PVC's on the m10i doing the
switching.
[edit]
interfaces {
so-1/0/0 {
encapsulatio
Stacy, Tomohiko and Sridhar,
Thank you for the help.
Li
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:35 AM, Stacy W. Smith wrote:
> 3,2,1
>
> u...@host> show configuration groups groupA
> protocols {
>bgp {
>group <*> {
>neighbor <*> {
>import policy-1;
>}
>
That seems a bit dishonest, no? Given that the only part they won't support is
the one you're switching out for the sake of getting support doesn't strike me
as above board. Maybe I'm alone on this.
Network Engineer, JNCIS-M
> 214-981-1954 (office)
> 214-642-4075 (cell)
> jbrash...@hq.speak
Matthew Walster wrote:
2009/8/20 Nam, Nguyen Hoang
When I config ssh-rsa key begin "1024
The 1024 is there for you, not for the key - the parses already knows it's
1024-bit, hence the big long base-64 string.
My question is how to config ssh-rsa to affect the authenticat
11 matches
Mail list logo
