[j-nsp] Changing advertised BGP metric based on condition

2009-10-13 Thread Kevin Wormington
Hi All, I'm fairly new to JunOS running 9.6 on M7i gear. I have two M7i's that are each connected to one particular peer (same AS) that doesn't support BFD for BGP or BFD for routes and the links also go through an intermediate layer 2 switch (not ours; on the upstream side) so a fast failov

Re: [j-nsp] Logical Routers Question

2009-10-13 Thread Ben Hammadi, Kayssar (NSN - TN/Tunis)
Assalamou 3alykom , how are you doing ? For routers that have simple configuration ( simple CE for exemple ) you can use routing-instance whith type virtual-router included in a logical router Br. -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun..

[j-nsp] flow-route questions.

2009-10-13 Thread Alexandre Snarskii
Hi! While thinking about using RFC5575 (flow routes), i found at least some questions that i'm not able to answer. a) RFC clearly states that 'flow routes must be validated' and describes validation procedure using destination-prefix attribute. But at the same time RFC does not enforce destin

Re: [j-nsp] VRRP and IPv6 router advertisements

2009-10-13 Thread Chris Spears
Set "virtual-router-only" under your router-advertisement; then only the VRRP master will send RA's. http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos9.5/information-products/topic-collections/swconfig-high-availability/vrrp-master-router-advertisement-interval-configuring.html --Chris Tore Anders

Re: [j-nsp] Logical Routers Question

2009-10-13 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:36:36PM +0300, Walaa Abdel razzak wrote: > Hi > > I need to simulate JNCIE LAB which has more than 15 routers including > configured routers, eBGP neighbours, CE's. Each logical-router instance takes the full resources of a complete router. For example, 2 LR's with full

Re: [j-nsp] Logical Routers Question

2009-10-13 Thread Walaa Abdel razzak
What about the interfaces that will be assigned to the CE? Is it possible to assign them inside the routing-instance like logical routers or we can use the lo0 sub-interfaces only. Best Regards, Walaa Abdel Razzak -Original Message- From: Ben Hammadi, Kayssar (NSN - TN/Tunis) [mailto:kays

Re: [j-nsp] Logical Routers Question

2009-10-13 Thread Walaa Abdel razzak
Hi I need to simulate JNCIE LAB which has more than 15 routers including configured routers, eBGP neighbours, CE's. Best Regards, Walaa Abdel Razzak From: Sean Clarke [mailto:s...@clarke-3.demon.nl] Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 3:10 PM To: Walaa Abdel razzak Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.ne

Re: [j-nsp] EX3200 Interop with Cisco 4948

2009-10-13 Thread Bill Blackford
Have you swapped out the cable? Gigabit spec will downshift if one of the pairs is open. -b -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of techt...@gmail.com Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 10:44 PM To: juniper-nsp@p

Re: [j-nsp] EX3200 Interop with Cisco 4948

2009-10-13 Thread Adam Armstrong
Muhammad Jawwad Paracha wrote: Hi, We have installed EX3200 with Cisco 3750, its working gr8. Two things, statically configure duplex and speed on both switches. No, please do not do that. It's not 1997 anymore. Recommending that people do it as standard is not a good thing. If you're failin

Re: [j-nsp] Logical Routers Question

2009-10-13 Thread Sean Clarke
No chance with logical routers .. but virtual routers should be possible, What are you trying to achieve with them ? cheers Sean On 10/13/09 1:51 PM, Walaa Abdel razzak wrote: Hi Experts Do you have ideas about increasing the number of logical routers per physical router. I know that maxi

[j-nsp] Logical Routers Question

2009-10-13 Thread Walaa Abdel razzak
Hi Experts Do you have ideas about increasing the number of logical routers per physical router. I know that maximum is 15 routers but we need to simulate a lab consists of about 24 logical routers on physical M7i router, any ideas? ___ juniper-nsp m

Re: [j-nsp] EX3200 Interop with Cisco 4948

2009-10-13 Thread Mark Tinka
On Tuesday 13 October 2009 02:15:03 pm Muhammad Jawwad Paracha wrote: > We have installed EX3200 with Cisco 3750, its working > gr8. Two things, statically configure duplex and speed on > both switches. We've had great success with auto-neg between EX3200 and 3560G. Suffice it to say, the 3560

[j-nsp] VRRP and IPv6 router advertisements

2009-10-13 Thread Tore Anderson
Hi, I've got some problems getting VRRP and router advertisements to play nice. I configured my MXes like this (based on the example in the High Availability Configuration Guide): On router A: [edit interfaces xe-1/1/0 unit 524 family inet6] rpf-check; address fe80::221:5900:3e0e:633a/64; addre

Re: [j-nsp] Single Strand SFPs in EX Switches

2009-10-13 Thread Gavin Tweedie
I Goodall wrote: Cisco switches we use a lot of Prolabs SFPs. Can anyone confirm if the EX switches work OK with Cisco coded SFPs? I haven't found a SFP that doesn't work in the MX or EX platforms yet - Juniper, Finisar, Cisco and some generic OEM SFPs have all be fine. BX optics I've used

Re: [j-nsp] EX3200 Interop with Cisco 4948

2009-10-13 Thread Muhammad Jawwad Paracha
Hi, We have installed EX3200 with Cisco 3750, its working gr8. Two things, statically configure duplex and speed on both switches. Turn off keepalive on cisco interface connected to juniper switch or statically configure keepalive on both switches for e.g 5 sec., keepalive do cause problem when