Re: [j-nsp] J/SRX and ip fragmentation

2010-01-25 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:20:31PM -0600, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > Oh good lord. I tried to downgrade the SRX from 10.0R2 to 9.6R2 after a > few people suggested off-list that there might be some sw bugs, but the > SRX never came back from the upgrade: > > FreeBSD/MIPS U-Boot bootstrap loa

Re: [j-nsp] J/SRX and ip fragmentation

2010-01-25 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 03:04:39PM -0600, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > Perhaps somebody with some experience on these platforms can help answer > this one. I have an SRX210 running 10.0R2 at my house, running an IPSEC > ESP'd GRE tunnel over my trusty home connectivity to a J2300 on the > other

[j-nsp] J/SRX and ip fragmentation

2010-01-25 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
Perhaps somebody with some experience on these platforms can help answer this one. I have an SRX210 running 10.0R2 at my house, running an IPSEC ESP'd GRE tunnel over my trusty home connectivity to a J2300 on the other end (running 9.3R4, the last real junos image made for 'em). The network in t

Re: [j-nsp] Basic doubt on unit

2010-01-25 Thread Brandon Bennett
What are you doubting? That you have to do it? That it's absolutely necessary? That Cisco is better in it's implementation that allows ip addresses in the main interfaces config? The idea is not to think about it as a "subinterface" but to think of it of where the layer 3 configuration is at.

Re: [j-nsp] Basic doubt on unit

2010-01-25 Thread Kevin Oberman
> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:03:58 +0530 > From: Taqdir Singh > Sender: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > > Hi All, > > I am new to juniper.l could you please share why junos is made such like > we must define unit (subinterface) for any configuration like ip etc ? Because Juniper is a mod

[j-nsp] DHCP Relay

2010-01-25 Thread Kevin Wormington
Hi All, I'm using (or at least trying to) extended DHCP Relay on JunOS 9.6R1.3 on M7i. I have noticed that when you enable DHCP relay on an interface then it drops transit traffic that is udp port 67 on *any* interface. I have a JTAC ticket open and they are telling me this is expected beha

[j-nsp] Basic doubt on unit

2010-01-25 Thread Taqdir Singh
Hi All, I am new to juniper.l could you please share why junos is made such like we must define unit (subinterface) for any configuration like ip etc ? -- Taqdir Singh Network Engineering (+91) 991-170-9496 | (+91) 801-041-5988 One who asks is a fool for a moment, one who doesn't ask remains

Re: [j-nsp] IPv6

2010-01-25 Thread Andy Davidson
On 23/01/2010 14:22, Muhammad Aamir wrote: > We are planning to go with IPv6; currently we have all Junipers in the Core. > I just want to know does juniper supports all features related to IPv6. > Anybody faced any problem while configuring IPv6 on their Juniper routers. > Does JUNOS (version 9.4)

Re: [j-nsp] JunoScript VRRP Information

2010-01-25 Thread Curtis Call
> > Is there a sure way to determine this for any particular operational > command? I'm thinking in particular of EX-specific stuff which has no > API documentation and impoverished JUNOS documentation. > Not as of Junos 10.0, but there will be a way in future releases to more easily determine

Re: [j-nsp] JunoScript VRRP Information

2010-01-25 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 03:22:49PM -0800, Curtis Call wrote: > There is no XML API element for "show vrrp brief". However, you can > use the API element to execute this by including "show > vrrp brief" as the element's text contents. Is there a sure way to determine this for any particular opera