Re: [j-nsp] event script: "set protocols overload' if more than "x" SIB is/are failed

2010-02-24 Thread Curtis Call
While they don't cover the exact event that you are referring to, there are examples of event scripts that change the configuration in response to a system event in the Day One: Applying Junos Event Automation guide: http://www.juniper.net/us/en/local/pdf/day-one-guides/7100110-en.pdf For examp

Re: [j-nsp] Finally...

2010-02-24 Thread Mark Tinka
On Thursday 25 February 2010 08:16:34 am Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > Not that I have any expectations that Juniper would take > me up on the offer, but sure they can have a free GigE > if it improves my download speeds. :) I'm down with that :-). Mark. signature.asc Description: This is

[j-nsp] event script: "set protocols overload' if more than "x" SIB is/are failed

2010-02-24 Thread Ricardo Tavares
Hi Fellows, Have anyone created an event-script that change the router conf based on a SIB failure event? The idea is isolate a router that is still operational considering the routing plane but not so ok considering the forwarding plane (one or more SIB failed). I think that is possible to w

Re: [j-nsp] Finally...

2010-02-24 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:49:35AM -0800, Dan Farrell wrote: > I'm sorry, did you just volunteer an off-site repository? That's a > great idea, thanks for volunteering it! Not that I have any expectations that Juniper would take me up on the offer, but sure they can have a free GigE if it improve

[j-nsp] Allan Toh/NERATEL/ASIA/NERA is out of the office

2010-02-24 Thread allan . toh
I will be out of the office starting 24-02-2010 and will not return until 12-03-2010. I have limited or no access to email during this period. For support matters or queries, pls call the hotline line 63800210 Option 1 or email itnw_supp...@neratel.com.sg. For urgent matters, pls call or sms m

Re: [j-nsp] congestioning a logical sub-interface

2010-02-24 Thread meryem Z
hello , this is a geat thing for congestion simulation. is there any juniper document confirming this ? thank you. > Subject: RE: [j-nsp] congestioning a logical sub-interface > Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:24:50 +0530 > From: ragha...@juniper.net > To: merye...@hotmail.com; tru...@suspicious.o

Re: [j-nsp] Diagnostic Optics MIB support

2010-02-24 Thread Bjørn Tore
Alessandro Inzerilli skrev: Hello, I'm looking for JunOS MIBs giving access to diagnostic optics information, basically what you see issuing the CLI command show interfaces diagnostics optics Physical interface: so-0/0/0 Laser bias current: 21.392 mA Laser outpu