www.ronan-online.com/forsale.html
On Mar 21, 2010, at 7:10 PM, Shane Ronan wrote:
Hello everyone,
This might be slightly off topic, but I am shutting down a large
network, and selling off the assets.
Information is @ www.ronan-online/forsale.html
I will be adding items to the list as they
Hello everyone,
This might be slightly off topic, but I am shutting down a large
network, and selling off the assets.
Information is @ www.ronan-online/forsale.html
I will be adding items to the list as they come offline, as well as
the location of each asset.
Email me with any questions or of
On Sunday 21 March 2010 08:52:54 pm chrisccnpsp...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Then also take the fact that the 6500 is
> dead as a strategic platform. The Nexus 7k is the new
> boy on the block.
You've probably heard that the 6500 will be getting a new
switch fabric/supervisor module which should res
Yes, you are correct. The Cat6500 has some new hardware coming to it,
however it's still going to be the Cat6500 at the end of the day. Still
using IOS, still integrating with older line cards, etc.. The Cat6500 has
served my company for years, we have thousands in production ranging from
Sup1a to
Everyone, you do realize that the EX switches were designed to get Juniper into
the enterprise switching market (although poorly). This is what they are doing,
Don't expect features of the MX to show up.
As of the current software offering the EX 8200 isn't even up to par with a
6500 feature w
> > So the EX (4200) bits from my personal list:
> > * EX4200 - bootp relay doesn't work when configured inside a
> > routing-instance, works when configured at top to use an instance
>
> Got bitten by this one a couple of weekends ago, during a big roll-out.
>
> Very counter-intuitive 'fix'.
>
* Richard A Steenbergen
> Correct. I actually found some old gripes about this when I searched
> j-nsp after noticing the problem, but it is a big enough issue that I
> think it needs to be repeated again (and again and again, until it
> gets fixed :P).
I'll be happy to join the choir on this one
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 06:08:33PM +1100, Julien Goodwin wrote:
> > * Obviously this is a very different architecture from Juniper's normal
> > boxes, so be prepared for vlan space being shared across the entire box,
> > not a per-interface basis.
>
> So far, apart from the MX I'm not aware of a
Hi,
..straying a bit off topic..
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Julien Goodwin
wrote:
> So the EX (4200) bits from my personal list:
> * EX4200 - bootp relay doesn't work when configured inside a
> routing-instance, works when configured at top to use an instance
Got bitten by this one a coup
On 21/03/10 02:03, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> We just deployed our first EX8208 a few days ago, running 10.1R1.
> Gotchas so far:
>
> * Obviously this is a very different architecture from Juniper's normal
> boxes, so be prepared for vlan space being shared across the entire box,
> not a pe
10 matches
Mail list logo
