I am using 10.1R1.8 and it's been very stable but using it primarily for
L2-bridging on none 3D Trio hardware.
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Derick Winkworth
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 5:15 PM
To:
Ahh, so 10.1 is needed then for the MX80 I'm guessing... We'll be testing
those soon in a POC where they will run VPLS, RSVP, COS, BGP, and L3VPNs...
From: Richard A Steenbergen
To: Bj?rn Tore
Cc: "juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net"
Sent: Fri, April 30, 2010 3
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 09:55:23AM +0200, Bj?rn Tore wrote:
> We're running 10.0R2.10 on MX. Works quite well.
We just tested 10.0R3 on MX and it was a giant hot steaming mess. Among
other problems, they broke "| last" in cli, isis overload timeout no
longer functions (would never time out, stayed
I have in configured remote span to work across a lag (junos 9.3)
The important thing to remember is the output vlan can only egress the switch
on one logical port.
If you allow all vlan on a trunk, the span vlan is now trying to egress on two
logical ports.
ae5 {
description "SW1
Gentlefolk,
it is a long time I had to think or worry about this kind of thing.
I am familiar with l2circuits, and the fact that engineering them is
a bit painful I clearly remember. I also know 'protocol connections'
and like that approach as well as you need the added control sometimes.
I am c
Can you share a sanitized config?
From: Nick Ryce
To: "juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net"
Sent: Fri, April 30, 2010 4:08:21 AM
Subject: [j-nsp] Juniper IPSEC VPN
Is there a default speed that a juniper ipec tunnel runs at? We have an
asa5510 and an 1812 where t
I haven't worked on then series at ll but I believe it is a full software
based processing router. The CPU is stony enough to handle the ipsec tunnel
count but that doesn't mean it can push the throughput.
On Apr 30, 2010 7:21 AM, "Nick Ryce" wrote:
Spec sheets say it should be able to hand a c
Just found JXH-HC2-S
Might give that a try but its an expensive 'punt'
Nick
From: Chris Evans [mailto:chrisccnpsp...@gmail.com]
Sent: 30 April 2010 12:13
To: Nick Ryce
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper IPSEC VPN
The asa has a hardware encryption engine in it. I don't
Spec sheets say it should be able to hand a couple of hundred vpn tunnels so
not sure if that would be? Is there a hardware encryption module for the
junipers?
Nick
From: Chris Evans [mailto:chrisccnpsp...@gmail.com]
Sent: 30 April 2010 12:13
To: Nick Ryce
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subje
The asa has a hardware encryption engine in it. I don't believe that the j
series router has one. That is the root of your problem I would say.
On Apr 30, 2010 5:13 AM, "Nick Ryce" wrote:
Is there a default speed that a juniper ipec tunnel runs at? We have an
asa5510 and an 1812 where the ipsec
Is there a default speed that a juniper ipec tunnel runs at? We have an
asa5510 and an 1812 where the ipsec tunnel was running near full speed on a 10
meg link. We swapped the 1812 with a 2320 running 9.6R2.8 and we are seeing
lost packets and slow throughput. The tunnel does not drop once es
OBrien, Will skrev:
Anyone using any 10. Code yet? I get to annoy my juniper reps later so input is
appreciated.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
We're running 10.0R2.10 o
12 matches
Mail list logo
