[j-nsp] MS-DPC, Nat between IPv6 and IPv4.

2010-05-05 Thread Peter Krupl
Hi Group, We recently purchased some MX240's for our network. Initially the where supposed to be used as MPLS PE routers. And for DHCP + PPPoE subscriber termination. We are relying on netflow, for traffic accounting so we also got the MS-DPC's for that purpose. But the MS-DPC offers much more th

[j-nsp] ICHIP/CB error on MX

2010-05-05 Thread Joerg Staedele
Hi there, my log is full of messages like: May 6 06:43:50 fpc2 ICHIP(3)_REG_ERR:Non first cell drops in ichip fi rord: 9 May 6 06:45:50 fpc2 ICHIP(0)_REG_ERR:Non first cell drops in ichip fi rord: 0 May 6 06:47:51 fpc2 ICHIP(3)_REG_ERR:Non first cell drops in ichip fi rord: 9 May 6 06:49:5

[j-nsp] Link aggregation and RSVP

2010-05-05 Thread Kris Price
Hi all, The subject is using link aggregation with RSVP. Or just generally the subject of how best to handle multiple parallel links between adjacent routers in a MPLS network. I'm hoping the list can provide guidance on the best practise for this, or point me to useful material. The context

Re: [j-nsp] BGP Communities

2010-05-05 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 04:24:04PM +0100, Alex wrote: > Hello there, > Below regex works too: > > community inbound- members "(11666:2000)|(11666:2002)" The downside to this is you can't add communities using the same named definition, since regexp can only be used to match. If you have two s

Re: [j-nsp] BGP Communities

2010-05-05 Thread Andrey Zarechansky
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 10:05:42AM -0400, Paul Stewart wrote: Hi, Paul! [dd] > > In the Cisco world, we had to define network statements of our own subnets > and route those blocks to Null0 in order to advertise. I'm thinking > something similar here in JunOS? You can check what is actually adv

Re: [j-nsp] BGP Communities

2010-05-05 Thread Alex
Hello there, Below regex works too: community inbound- members "(11666:2000)|(11666:2002)" Saves a line of code :-) Rgds Alex - Original Message - From: "Smith W. Stacy" To: "Paul Stewart" Cc: "'jnsp'" Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 3:41 PM Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP Communities

Re: [j-nsp] BGP Communities

2010-05-05 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 10:05:42AM -0400, Paul Stewart wrote: > community inbound- members [ 11666:2000 11666:2002 ]; > community outbound- members [ 11666:4000 11666:5000 ]; Defining multiple members like this is how you implement a logical AND, so both members will be required if

Re: [j-nsp] BGP Communities

2010-05-05 Thread Smith W. Stacy
Hi Paul, Your current outbound policy will only match routes that have BOTH 11666:4000 AND 11666:5000. These statements: > from community outbound-xx; > community outbound- members [ 11666:4000 11666:5000 ]; result in a logical AND. Instead, you probably want something li

Re: [j-nsp] BGP Communities

2010-05-05 Thread Felix Schueren
Paul, When I do "show route community 11666:5000" I get a list of the proper prefixes as expected. 11666:5000 is our own network routes. The same occurs when I list 11666:4000 which is customer network routes - displays the list correctly. This confirms in my mind that the MX480 is receiving

Re: [j-nsp] RPD event M20

2010-05-05 Thread juniper
Thanks, we're going to try these steps out and I will let you know. El 05/05/2010 4:30, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim escribió: without studying your topology in detail, i think the best reason that can be explained by your rtsockmon output is there is spurious routing updates in your topology. these

[j-nsp] BGP Communities

2010-05-05 Thread Paul Stewart
Good morning.. I hope I'm not being a "pain" to folks on the list.. J So we have our first MX480 up and running now - things are progressing along nicely thanks to all the help from this list. OSPF, IPv4/IPv6, iBGP up and running. Having a small issue around eBGP peering. When I bring up a

Re: [j-nsp] Understanding DPC Cards

2010-05-05 Thread Paul Stewart
Richard, Martin, & Nilesh... thank you for the all the feedback. We got the box online and starting to function ;) Our goal with this box is to migrate everything off a 7606 that's currently performing a variety of tasks at layer2/layer3 including BGP etc... once we get some other boxes online, t

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper-Cisco Hardware Comparison

2010-05-05 Thread Martin Barry
$quoted_author = "Walaa Abdel razzak" ; > > If I would like to compare the features of Juniper/Cisco products from > the same family. I mean if you have a Cisco router and you want to find > the equivalent or near equivalent router in Juniper (Enterprise/Service > Provide), is there any tool or U

[j-nsp] Juniper-Cisco Hardware Comparison

2010-05-05 Thread Walaa Abdel razzak
Hi Experts If I would like to compare the features of Juniper/Cisco products from the same family. I mean if you have a Cisco router and you want to find the equivalent or near equivalent router in Juniper (Enterprise/Service Provide), is there any tool or URL for this? BR, __