Hi Group,
We recently purchased some MX240's for our network. Initially the
where supposed to be used as MPLS PE routers. And for DHCP + PPPoE
subscriber termination. We are relying on netflow, for traffic accounting
so we also got the MS-DPC's for that purpose.
But the MS-DPC offers much more th
Hi there,
my log is full of messages like:
May 6 06:43:50 fpc2 ICHIP(3)_REG_ERR:Non first cell drops in ichip fi rord: 9
May 6 06:45:50 fpc2 ICHIP(0)_REG_ERR:Non first cell drops in ichip fi rord: 0
May 6 06:47:51 fpc2 ICHIP(3)_REG_ERR:Non first cell drops in ichip fi rord: 9
May 6 06:49:5
Hi all,
The subject is using link aggregation with RSVP. Or just generally the
subject of how best to handle multiple parallel links between adjacent
routers in a MPLS network. I'm hoping the list can provide guidance on
the best practise for this, or point me to useful material.
The context
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 04:24:04PM +0100, Alex wrote:
> Hello there,
> Below regex works too:
>
> community inbound- members "(11666:2000)|(11666:2002)"
The downside to this is you can't add communities using the same named
definition, since regexp can only be used to match. If you have two
s
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 10:05:42AM -0400, Paul Stewart wrote:
Hi, Paul!
[dd]
>
> In the Cisco world, we had to define network statements of our own subnets
> and route those blocks to Null0 in order to advertise. I'm thinking
> something similar here in JunOS?
You can check what is actually adv
Hello there,
Below regex works too:
community inbound- members "(11666:2000)|(11666:2002)"
Saves a line of code :-)
Rgds
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "Smith W. Stacy"
To: "Paul Stewart"
Cc: "'jnsp'"
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP Communities
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 10:05:42AM -0400, Paul Stewart wrote:
> community inbound- members [ 11666:2000 11666:2002 ];
> community outbound- members [ 11666:4000 11666:5000 ];
Defining multiple members like this is how you implement a logical AND,
so both members will be required if
Hi Paul,
Your current outbound policy will only match routes that have BOTH 11666:4000
AND 11666:5000.
These statements:
> from community outbound-xx;
> community outbound- members [ 11666:4000 11666:5000 ];
result in a logical AND.
Instead, you probably want something li
Paul,
When I do "show route community 11666:5000" I get a list of the proper
prefixes as expected. 11666:5000 is our own network routes. The same
occurs when I list 11666:4000 which is customer network routes - displays
the list correctly. This confirms in my mind that the MX480 is receiving
Thanks, we're going to try these steps out and I will let you know.
El 05/05/2010 4:30, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim escribió:
without studying your topology in detail, i think the best reason that
can be explained by your rtsockmon output is there is spurious routing
updates in your topology. these
Good morning.. I hope I'm not being a "pain" to folks on the list.. J
So we have our first MX480 up and running now - things are progressing along
nicely thanks to all the help from this list. OSPF, IPv4/IPv6, iBGP up and
running.
Having a small issue around eBGP peering. When I bring up a
Richard, Martin, & Nilesh... thank you for the all the feedback. We got the
box online and starting to function ;)
Our goal with this box is to migrate everything off a 7606 that's currently
performing a variety of tasks at layer2/layer3 including BGP etc... once we
get some other boxes online, t
$quoted_author = "Walaa Abdel razzak" ;
>
> If I would like to compare the features of Juniper/Cisco products from
> the same family. I mean if you have a Cisco router and you want to find
> the equivalent or near equivalent router in Juniper (Enterprise/Service
> Provide), is there any tool or U
Hi Experts
If I would like to compare the features of Juniper/Cisco products from
the same family. I mean if you have a Cisco router and you want to find
the equivalent or near equivalent router in Juniper (Enterprise/Service
Provide), is there any tool or URL for this?
BR,
__
14 matches
Mail list logo