On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 08:06:56AM +0800, Tony Frank wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> > During a peer migration from a Cisco 7600 over to Juniper MX480 we have run
> > across a particular peer that we cannot re-establish:
>
> > Jun 9 13:17:07 core1.toronto1 rpd[1301]: bgp_process_open:2625: NOTIFICATION
> >
Hey there,
I think you really don't want to do any QoS mechanics at the PVC level and then
L3 level. You really want to have one place where you queue or things get
difficult quickly.
If you really needed to define CBR parameters for a circuit, then I would
understand, but ATM shaping is real
Hi Paul,
> During a peer migration from a Cisco 7600 over to Juniper MX480 we have run
> across a particular peer that we cannot re-establish:
> Jun 9 13:17:07 core1.toronto1 rpd[1301]: bgp_process_open:2625: NOTIFICATION
> sent to xxx.xxx.115.132 (External AS x): code 2 (Open Message Error)
Hello,
i am just experiencing and strange problem in regards to a
RE-3.0/RE-600. Its working fine in a T320 but not in a M5/M10 (normal
FEB). Its part number (from show chassis hardware on the T320) is
740-007603 REV 1.
It appears there are several RE-3.0 with different part numbers, this
one see
Hi there..
During a peer migration from a Cisco 7600 over to Juniper MX480 we have run
across a particular peer that we cannot re-establish:
Jun 9 13:17:07 core1.toronto1 rpd[1301]: bgp_process_open:2625: NOTIFICATION
sent to xxx.xxx.115.132 (External AS x): code 2 (Open Message Error)
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 04:34:41PM -0400, Phil Shafer wrote:
>
> "request pfe execute" aka . I think it
> first appeared in 9.x, but it may have been 8.x.
Hrm cool, learn something new every day. :) It'd be nice if there was a
"request pfe shell" as well, as an alias to what start shell pfe does
Richard A Steenbergen writes:
>But speaking of feature requests related to viewing stuff in the pfe,
>I'd love to get something to run a single command on a remote shell and
>then exit (i.e. invoke cprod -c rather than vty). Similar to how Cisco
>gives you "remote login" (i.e. start shell pfe) a
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 08:57:20PM +0200, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
> > We try to avoid the terms "ifd" and "ifl" completely in our docs,
> > but these internal terms have slipped out in a few places. The
> > relationship is fairly simple: "ifd" is the physical interface
> > device, where "ifl" is
> We try to avoid the terms "ifd" and "ifl" completely in our docs,
> but these internal terms have slipped out in a few places. The
> relationship is fairly simple: "ifd" is the physical interface
> device, where "ifl" is the logical interface (aka unit). Logical
> interfaces are arranged as ch
Shiva Shankar writes:
>Hi All, I was going through some commands and cos related statistics for in
>shell more. I can see most of the time IFL is associated with cos related
>statistics...Is there any documentation which explains the relation with IFD
>and IFL and how they are used to interact?
We
> I don't believe the SSG does SYN proxy'ing, correct?
It does indeed support that. Check in the "screen" options for SYN flood limit,
as well as enable SYN-Cookie under "flow options".
- Chris.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.n
It looks like, first your primary device failed and then there was a
disconnect of your Control link
You should configure control-link recovery
set chassis cluster control-link-recovery
for re-enabling the disabled device automatically
regards,
Muhammad Fahad Khan
JNCIP - M/T # 834
IT Speciali
Hi All, I was going through some commands and cos related statistics for in
shell more. I can see most of the time IFL is associated with cos related
statistics...Is there any documentation which explains the relation with IFD
and IFL and how they are used to interact?
Thanks
_
Hi!
Is that possible to have MTU=1500B on any kind of pseudowire
configured over GRE tunnel between 2 J-series routers?
The tunnel is established over the internet, with access links'
MTU=1500B on both sides. I tried with CCC, l2circuit, l2vpn and various
settings of fragmentation, but I can't r
Hi Felipe,
>
>last friday had a power failure, and after getting power back
>we had a non-working M7i box. Chassis alarms doesn't even light on.
>
>Looking at console port there was FreeBSD boot saying
>something about "error
>32 lba 0" and "error 16 lba 0",
>which took me to understand the disk
15 matches
Mail list logo