Hi Rolf,
Truman is correct.
I just found that the J4350 you are referring to (Just so that the forum knows,
Rolf and I work for the same company) has 1Gig RAM installed on it but is
already 81% Utilized.
...@> show chassis routing-engine
Routing Engine status:
Temperature
Yes you can do this on a J-series. If you can handle the full table in inet.0,
you can handle this full table in a VRF. Just make sure you have enough RAM to
hold a full table (regardless of the type of routing-instance) ...
Truman
On 20/06/2010, at 4:53 PM, Rolf Mendelsohn wrote:
> Hi All,
i wonder what the real world performance implications are on an ASIC forwarding
platform... We really haven't seen any issues with the way we are doing it.
I think I prefer the flexibility for later
From: "Richmond, Jeff"
To: Addy Mathur
Cc: Derick Winkworth
I agree. One thing that we do fairly often is create a multifield classifier
like this to just accept a couple of values to place into the appropriate
forwarding-class, then for a default action reset to BE forwarding-class for
all non-matching traffic. This works well in situations where you ma
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 04:35:40PM +1000, Dale Shaw wrote:
> Has anyone had problems with EX4200s and filesystem corruption
> relating to ungraceful power-downs, routine reboots (i.e. for JUNOS
> upgrades or whatever), or anything else? Does anyone know of any
> tricks to access a switch in this st
On Sunday 20 June 2010 10:55:10 pm Chris Evans wrote:
> Agreed I asked juniper for the same thing but got blown
> off.
You can remark/rewrite on ingress but:
- only to 'dscp 0'/'dscp be'
- only on some platforms (M320, T-series, MPC MX cards)
So it's not quite there.
Cheers,
Agreed I asked juniper for the same thing but got blown off. Egress
remarking rewrites everything not just what I want.
On Jun 20, 2010 10:52 AM, "Mark Tinka" wrote:
On Sunday 20 June 2010 05:15:45 pm Derick Winkworth wrote:
> I
> would use a rewrite rule to modif...
I still prefer the IOS w
On Sunday 20 June 2010 05:15:45 pm Derick Winkworth wrote:
> I
> would use a rewrite rule to modify DSCP on egress, so
> that its consistent across platforms.
I still prefer the IOS way, where TOS byte values are re-
written on ingress (I believe we began a small petition for
this capability a
I personally think Dale's firewall configuration is better. The
config allows for a packet to exit fw filter evaluation once a match
condition is met, by being subjected to a single action. Derick's FW
filter forces a packet to traverse all terms regardless of a match,
and is subjected to at leas
Hello,
I would like to know what is the recommended sampling rates to use on
a network and what can the juniper support.
In addition, what factors determine what sampling rate to use.
Thanks you!
--tim
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.neth
This is probably better:
term BEST-EFFORT
thenforwarding-class best-effort
next-term
term DSCP-EF
fromdscp ef
thenforwarding-class expedited-forwarding
next-term
term default-accept
thenaccept
You can insert additional terms later to modify loss-priority, sampling, etc...
after the classificati
Hi all,
Re: setting the forwarding-class of a packet through a firewall filter.
Many (almost all) of the examples I've looked at do not include a
catch-all term to handle packets not matched by any explicitly-defined
terms. At the risk of exposing myself as a J-noob...
Is it safe to assume that,
12 matches
Mail list logo
