Hi Harris
On 01/10/2010, at 3:35 PM, Harris Hui wrote:
> I am trying to configure our J6350 fiber interface to MTU 9192 to get a
> better TCP throughput. However, I can only able to configure the MTU size
> below 1500, when I configure the MTU to 9192 and commit the changes, it
> still shows MTU
On 01.10.10 07:26, Michel de Nostredame wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was checking my EX4200 trying to resolve a strange connection
> problem with my vendor through a Metro Ethernet.
> During that time I found another weird situation (it is not related to
> the metroEthernet connection).
>
> I setup two top
Dear all,
We had subscribed a private line circuit between 2 different data center
for Data Backup and replication. The bandwidth of the private line is
100Mbps.
According to the provider, The Circuit is Built across their
Network as 2 STS1's or High Speed DS3's which equals 100meg.
Their GE
Hi,
I was checking my EX4200 trying to resolve a strange connection
problem with my vendor through a Metro Ethernet.
During that time I found another weird situation (it is not related to
the metroEthernet connection).
I setup two topology to test
EX4200.ae0 ===(LACP,trunk)=== ae0.M10
On above
Aloha,
does anyone out there have any experience deploying an SRX3k series (3400
cluster strictly A/P), with IDP services? Anyone know of any A/P IDP-specific
gotchas? or recommendations on running IDP in an A/P configuration?
we are looking to deploy this setup for a customer in the next mon
I'm not sure that this is the only issue, but something I just spotted
under pbr_fe-0/0/6_adsl:
route 0.0.0.0/24
I would have thought that if it didnt match a route that instance, it
would have been dropped. If that is the case, then something else is
going wrong beforehand and the traffic isn't h
I want to have all the traffic default routed to 10.10.10.1 and when it comes
from source address 10.139.1.167/32 it should be routed to 192.168.254.1. I
have also applied filter to the LAN interface in inbound direction. But still
all the traffic is going through 10.10.10.1 even if it is ori
I'm not exactly sure what you are trying to get this config to do, but at
the very least you need to apply the firewall rule for the PBR to the
relevant interface,
set interface x unit 0 family inet filter input trust-adsl
Joe
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Bikash Bhattarai wrote:
> Dear al
This config is doing exactly what you configured it to do. That's how
computers work. Did you want it to do something else? If so, you might
want to tell us what you think it should be doing that it isn't.
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Bikash Bhattarai wrote:
Dear all,
My PBR configuration is be
Ahh I'm with you. A lot of people do refer to a l2 ethernet service
(vpls, pseudowires, LES etc) as L3VPN. when you said that it's all
Ethernet, I thought I'd raise it :)
On 30 September 2010 12:30, Dale Shaw wrote:
> Hi Heath,
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Heath Jones wrote:
>> So they
Hi Dale,
I've been working on a similar project for one of my customers. It can be a
little ugly in my opinion as you end up with a lot of extra protocols
running (potentially).
Juniper does have this really neat feature called Dynamic GRE tunnels which
really make enabling MPLS over GRE (over MP
Hi Heath,
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Heath Jones wrote:
> So they are routing IP?
> Or are they are switching ethernet?
Sorry, I can see how it wasn't clear.
All of the CE-PE access links are Ethernet, or at least have an
Ethernet hand-off. It's probably not relevant.
cheers,
Dale
__
Hi Dale,
This is a pretty key point because it will change the way you would
implement it..
> I'm looking at building a new 'enterprise' network - an extranet of
> sorts - *on top of* a NSP's L3VPN service.
So they are routing IP?
>>It's all Ethernet.
Or are they are switching ethernet?
If they
Hi Alexandre,
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Alexandre Snarskii wrote:
>
> Right question would be 'How do you exchange labels with your NSP?'.
> Because if there are no such exchange your NSP will not know what to
> do with MPLS packet entering his network and will just drop it at
> ingress.
>
Dear all,
My PBR configuration is below. I have configured everything as suggested in
juniper's documentation. But it's not working as desired. Please help me out
to sort out the issue.
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
description HO-LAN;
family inet {
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 05:52:56PM +1000, Dale Shaw wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm pondering my first production use of MPLS and I'm looking for some
> free advice.
>
> I'm looking at building a new 'enterprise' network - an extranet of
> sorts - *on top of* a NSP's L3VPN service. It's all Ethernet. I'
I have a M10i router with RE-850(740-011202) routing engine. If I
execute "show chassis environment routing-engine", following
information is printed:
r...@m10i> show chassis environment routing-engine
Routing Engine 0 status:
State Online Master
Temperature
Hi Guys,
Quick question. We have 2 x 6350's on 100mb connections to the internet and a
secure tunnel between them. Both run 9.6R3.8.
We were only seeing 40mb/s throughput on this and as a last gasp before
faulting to the carriers we moved it onto packet based forwarding with the
below:-
Hi all,
I'm pondering my first production use of MPLS and I'm looking for some
free advice.
I'm looking at building a new 'enterprise' network - an extranet of
sorts - *on top of* a NSP's L3VPN service. It's all Ethernet. I'd like
to be able to build my own pseudowires and create my own L3VPNs on
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Fahad Khan wrote:
> I am unable to access this link. Can you please attach the file or provide
> exact URL?
Start here:
http://kb.juniper.net/index?page=content&id=TN21&actp=LIST
cheers,
Dale
___
juniper-nsp maili
20 matches
Mail list logo
