We upgraded from NPE-G1s to M7i couple of years back , we are highly
impressed and highly recommenced..!
Perhaps you should also explore Foundry XMR-4 .
Samit
On 12/28/10 8:49 AM, Dwater wrote:
> I was thinking on M10i with ECFEB and related PIC. Any comments or
> recommendations?
>
> On Dec 2
I was thinking on M10i with ECFEB and related PIC. Any comments or
recommendations?
On Dec 27, 2010, at 9:34 PM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
> I guess that would depend on the hardware configuration that you have
> in your 7206? What NPE are you using?
>
> Assuming you're using an NPE-G1, which ca
I guess that would depend on the hardware configuration that you have
in your 7206? What NPE are you using?
Assuming you're using an NPE-G1, which can run a few GigE ports at 1
Mpps, some comparable routers might be:
Juniper J6350 -- A CPU-based router (more inexpensive) that'll route
400 Kpps an
If you are looking for a high performance box to replace a 7200 the M of
juniper is the closet product match for the 7200. Honestly I would recommend
the Cisco asr1k though. It can do all of the features you are looking for
out of the box.. Juniper m series needs an extra module to do
encryption
Mainly GE interfaces and wan MPLS connectivity with IPSec teemination as well
as Internet connectivity related device.
On Dec 27, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Adam Leff wrote:
> What type of interfaces and number of each type do you plan on terminate on
> the device? Throughput? Services?
>
> ~Adam
What type of interfaces and number of each type do you plan on terminate on
the device? Throughput? Services?
~Adam
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Dwater wrote:
> Which juniper router fits in place of 7206? We are planning to put juniper
> routers in.
> _
Which juniper router fits in place of 7206? We are planning to put juniper
routers in.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Someone refresh my memory...is the -B variant the only one that is MPLS
capable? What is the difference between P-1GE-LX and P-1GE-LX-B ??
--
Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food - Hippocrates
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck
I am having considerable trouble getting a J4350 running 10.1R3 to set
layer 2 COS bits in VLAN tagged packets.
This code used to work fine in 8.x code. It no longer appears to
work. We do run this unit in 'packet' rather than flow mode as this
router also runs BGP (and why oh why did Juni
Hi Akhmedd,
On Dec 24, 2010, at 4:58 AM, Akhmedd Aly wrote:
> is it mistake about IS-IS default policy - that IS-IS rejected by default
> learned routes from direct protocol?
> Check this link
> http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/3264/isisdefaultpolicy.png
>
> I think its must be accepted, and al
Hi!
Could you please copy the detail of the policy you are applying also?
Thanks
Cristian
El 27/12/2010 12:48, Gökhan Gümüş escribió:
Hi all,
I have two Juniper SRX 210 router which are connected via VPLS.
VPLS is up and running.
I am using 10.1R1.8 version on both boxes.
My question is
Hi ,
Pls see my policies on both routers,
R1,
R1> show configuration policy-options
policy-statement static-direct-to-ospf {
term 10 {
from protocol [ static direct ];
then accept;
R2,
R2> show configuration policy-options
policy-statement static-direct-to-ospf {
term 1
Thanks, but we need the 'show ospf database exensive' output as well.
--Stacy
On Dec 27, 2010, at 9:11 AM, Gökhan Gümüş wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Also please see the show ospf route detail output from boh routers,
>
> R1,
>
> the...@dcn.lon10.uk> show ospf route detail
> Topology default Route Ta
Hi all,
Also please see the show ospf route detail output from boh routers,
R1,
the...@dcn.lon10.uk> show ospf route detail
Topology default Route Table:
Prefix Path Route NH Metric NextHop Nexthop
Type Type TypeInterface
Addre
Can you provide the output of 'show ospf database extensive' and 'show ospf
route detail' from both routers?
--Stacy
On Dec 27, 2010, at 8:48 AM, Gökhan Gümüş wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have two Juniper SRX 210 router which are connected via VPLS.
> VPLS is up and running.
> I am using 10.1R1.8 v
Instead of simply doing a 'show route', can you show us the result of a
'show ospf database extensive'.
Stefan Fouant, CISSP, JNCIEx2
GPG Key ID: 0xB4C956EC
> -Original Message-
> From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
> boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gökhan
Hi all,
I have two Juniper SRX 210 router which are connected via VPLS.
VPLS is up and running.
I am using 10.1R1.8 version on both boxes.
My question is even if OSPF is up and running, routes are not being
exchanged each other.
I am accepting all OSPF traffic on security zones.
R1> show configur
On Friday, December 24, 2010 07:58:23 pm Akhmedd Aly wrote:
> P.S.
>
> is it mistake about IS-IS default policy - that IS-IS
> rejected by default learned routes from direct protocol?
> Check this link
> http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/3264/isisdefaultpolicy
> .png
>
> I think its must be acc
18 matches
Mail list logo
