Hi Team,
EBGp session is stuck in active/connect state between routing instances
connect through lt interfaces,communication between routing instances is
working fine through lt interface please find the config.
[edit routing-instances]
root# show
ISP-X {
instance-type virtual-router;
int
Yes, I like that idea too.. thanks for sharing that...;)
Paul
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chuck Anderson
Sent: January-12-11 7:23 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Aggregate R
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 04:01:45PM -0500, Paul Stewart wrote:
> Just wanted to write back to the list and say THANK YOU! I had already
> created a policy very similar to what you had suggested - but - when I added
> it to the outbound policy for the upstream I didn't pay attention to the
> order i
Just wanted to write back to the list and say THANK YOU! I had already
created a policy very similar to what you had suggested - but - when I added
it to the outbound policy for the upstream I didn't pay attention to the
order it was applied.
With it correctly applied *before* the existing "outbo
Is ok to disagree as your captures below prove your point and that you
are correct.
Apologies for the misinfo
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Smith W. Stacy [mailto:st...@acm.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 12:02 PM
To: Andy Vance
Cc: Paul Stewart; juniper-nsp
Subject: Re: [j-n
Sorry, but I still disagree with you. Only the active route in the routing
table is evaluated by export policy. I think the captures below illustrate my
point.
--Stacy
u...@host> show configuration protocols bgp
group foo {
export static-bgp;
neighbor 192.168.0.2 {
peer-as 2;
If Paul has an export policy picking up static routes, it should. An
export policy such as this
policy-statement static-bgp {
term static-routes {
from {
protocol static;
tag
route-filter 192.168.5.0/24 exact;
}
Hi Paul,
I'm assuming you meant 192.168.5.0/24 instead of 192.168.0.5/24.
I think your confusion arises from the fact that IOS provides several different
knobs to do similar, but slightly different, things. In IOS, network
statements, aggregate address, prefix lists, distribute lists, route map
Paul,
Assuming you have a static route policy to pick up static routes into
BGP, couldn't you just pin that /24 route down to discard, with a high
priority of 240 or so, to inject it into BGP, then allow the routing
table to use the OSPF route for packets destined to that /24 once
received?
Chee
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:27 AM, meryem Z wrote:
>
> Hello Community,
>
> When a juniper router is delivered , PICs are usually already installed.
> I need to know for an M10i router for example, what is the default hardware
> layout (slots used by default for each type of PICs) ? I didn't find
Hi folks..
Earlier this year I posed a question to the list and never did things
working the way I expected - so I'm revisiting the topic. I got several
helpful replies from folks but either am thick headed or misunderstood ;)
In our Cisco network, we use the "network" statement in our BGP
I think there is some rules to observe ..
I found in some technical bulletins about " PIC combination rules " for junos
versions 10.x ..
"In most cases, you can install PICs of different media types in the M10i
router. However,
configuration rules might limit certain combinations of PICs. Some
Hello Community,
When a juniper router is delivered , PICs are usually already installed.
I need to know for an M10i router for example, what is the default hardware
layout (slots used by default for each type of PICs) ? I didn't find any
recommandation about slots to be used for each type of
13 matches
Mail list logo
